Evaluating Avive+ Soft Tissue Matrix for Prevention of Superficial Radial Nerve Morbidity Following Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest

May 4, 2026 updated by: John M Le, University of Alabama at Birmingham

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Evaluating Avive+ Soft Tissue Matrix for Prevention of Superficial Radial Nerve Morbidity Following Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest

Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction is commonly used for head and neck defects but is associated with donor-site morbidity, including neuropathic pain and sensory disturbance. This randomized controlled pilot study evaluates whether placement of a soft tissue matrix over the superficial radial nerve at the donor site reduces neuropathic pain and improves sensory outcomes compared to standard closure alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) harvest is associated with significant donor-site morbidity, including neuropathic pain, hypoesthesia, and functional impairment related to superficial radial nerve irritation and postoperative scar formation. Current donor-site management focuses on wound closure and healing but does not directly address nerve protection.

Avive+ Soft Tissue Matrix is a human-derived biologic material designed for soft tissue reinforcement and protection. Its use as a barrier over surgically manipulated nerves is biologically plausible but has not been studied in this clinical context.

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled pilot trial designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of Avive+ placement over the superficial radial nerve during RFFF harvest. Subjects will be randomized to standard closure versus Avive+ placement plus standard closure. Outcomes will focus on neuropathic pain, sensory function, and wound complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: John M Le, MD, DDS
  • Phone Number: 205-975-6356
  • Email: jle@uabmc.edu

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        • Contact:
          • John M Le, MD, DDS
          • Phone Number: 205-975-6356

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Undergoing RFFF for head and neck reconstruction
  • Treated at University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Willing to comply with follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reconstruction using a non-RFFF free flap
  • Pre-existing ipsilateral radial nerve neuropathy
  • Prior ipsilateral forearm surgery affecting nerve anatomy
  • Active donor-site infection
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease
  • Inability to complete follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Closure (Control)
  • Standard RFFF harvest
  • Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor-site closure
  • Standard RFFF harvest
  • Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor-site closure
Experimental: Avive+ Intervention
  • Standard RFFF harvest
  • Placement of Avive+ Soft Tissue Matrix over the superficial radial nerve
  • STSG donor-site closure
  • Standard RFFF harvest
  • Placement of Avive+ Soft Tissue Matrix over the superficial radial nerve
  • STSG donor-site closure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinically Significant Neuropathic Pain at 6 Months - DN4 score
Time Frame: 6 months
A DN4 questionnaire score of 4 or higher out of 10 indicates a high probability of neuropathic pain. This validated tool, which can be viewed in this DN4 Questionnaire consists of seven patient-interview questions and three clinician-examination items, with a total score distinguishing neuropathic from non-neuropathic pain. A score greater than or equal to 4 is considered positive for neuropathic pain
6 months
Clinically Significant Neuropathic Pain at 6 Months - Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is used to measure pain, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "worst pain imaginable"
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Pain Severity
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Commonly used in healthcare to measure pain, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "worst pain imaginable"
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Average Sensory Function with Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
The Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test is a quick, non-invasive, and objective clinical exam used to evaluate nerve function by measuring skin sensitivity to light touch and pressure.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Average Sensory Function with Static 2-point discrimination
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Static 2-point discrimination (2PD) is a clinical test measuring the minimum distance at which a patient can perceive two simultaneous touch stimuli as distinct, rather than one, using a device like an aesthesiometer or disk-criminator.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Percentage of Skin Graft Loss
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Measured by percentage of 0-100% total graft loss.
up to 3 months
Number of Participants that develop Infection
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Measured by presence of cellulitis/purulence requiring antibiotics and/or surgical debridement with antibiotics.
Up to 3 months
Number of participants with Tendon Exposure
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Measured by number of participants with visual appearance of tendon exposure.
up to 3 months
Change in QuickDASH score
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months
The QuickDASH is an 11-item questionnaire assessing upper limb musculoskeletal disability, scoring from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe).
3, 6, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John M Le, MD, DDS, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)

Clinical Trials on Standard Closure (Control)

Subscribe