Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System in Primary Care for the Screening and Assessment of Frailty in Patients Aged 65 and Over (FRAGICLIC)

May 11, 2026 updated by: CNGE Conseil

Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System in Primary Care for the Screening and Assessment of Frailty in Patients Aged 65 and Over: A Real-World Prospective Cohort Study

This observational study aims to evaluate the real-life use of a digital tool (Fragiclic) by general practitioners (GPs) and nurses to screen and assess frailty in adults aged 65 and over. Frailty is a syndrome that increases the risk of loss of autonomy, falls, hospitalizations, or death. The tool includes simple screening questionnaires (such as SEGAm) and a comprehensive assessment (CGA - Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment) to better manage patients' health.

The main question it aims to answer is:

  • What proportion of patients aged 65 and over will benefit from frailty screening or assessment using Fragiclic over 12 months?

A secondary question is

- Does the use of Fragiclic reduce the risk of unplanned hospitalizations or death in these patients?

For the secondary question, researchers will compare patients who received screening or assessment (with or without a Personalized Care Plan (PCP)) to those who did not, to determine if Fragiclic improves their health outcomes.

Participants will not have additional tasks: Their GP or nurse will use Fragiclic during routine consultations. Some patients may be asked to provide information about their health or quality of life (via their healthcare provider).

All data will be collected anonymously and securely

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

726

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Rue Charlie-Chaplin
      • Torcy, Rue Charlie-Chaplin, France, 77200

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged 65 years older among GP's patients in primary care

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 65 years or older
  • Patient or trusted person who provided oral non-opposition after receiving full information about the protocol
  • Managed by the general practitioner if the patient or nurse during the study period. If patients are assessed by a nurse : Patients whose general practitioner is a participating physician in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to express non-opposition or without a trusted person available to express non-opposition
  • Patients whose general practitioner (GP) is not a participating GP in the study
  • Patients or trusted persons who do not speak French

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who have benefited from at least one screening or frailty assessment associated with a personalized care plan
Time Frame: From patient enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12+/-1 months
This includes the implementation of a screening and/or assessment, whether complete or incomplete (incomplete grid and/or incomplete or not performed PCP)
From patient enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12+/-1 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of all-cause mortality and unplanned hospitalizations among patients included in the study
Time Frame: From patient enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12+/-1 months
The rates of all-cause mortality and unplanned hospitalizations among patients included in the study, based on whether they underwent screening or assessment (complete or incomplete implementation) versus no implementation, and according to the assessment tool used within the Fragiclic site (SEGAm alone +/- PCP vs. CGA alone +/- PCP vs. SEGAm+CGA +/- PCP)
From patient enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12+/-1 months
Number, percentage, and type of personalized care plans prescribed based on the tool used and the degree of PCP implementation
Time Frame: at 3 months after prescription
Number, percentage, and type of personalized care plans (PPS) prescribed based on the tool used (SEGAm alone vs. EGS alone vs. SEGAm + EGS), and the degree of PPS implementation (actions implemented)
at 3 months after prescription
Acceptability of the use of the Fragiclic platform among healthcare professionals (HCP) who are users and non-users
Time Frame: at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
Feasibility (number of SEGAm, EGS, and PPS completed by users, completion time, patient refusals, number of users, and monthly logins) Perceived satisfaction with the use of the tool (qualitative study) Perceived usefulness of the tool (actions implemented, observed health outcomes) (qualitative study) Perceived difficulties in screening, frailty assessment, and implementing care and support actions (qualitative study)
at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
Socio-demographic profiles of healthcare professionals (HCP) who are users and non-users (age, gender, mode of practice) and usage profiles (number of logins, SEGAm, EGS, and PPS completed, average usage duration)
Time Frame: at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
Socio-demographic profiles : age, gender, mode of practice Usage profile : number of logins, SEGAm, CGA, and PCP completed, average usage duration
at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
Number and percetange of complete implementation (patients with complete screening or assessment: complete frailty assessment grid and complete PPS)
Time Frame: at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
Complete implementation = patients with complete screening or assessment: complete frailty assessment grid and complete PPS
at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 2, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 2, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-A00640-49

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Geriatric Assessment

Subscribe