- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT07570628
Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System in Primary Care for the Screening and Assessment of Frailty in Patients Aged 65 and Over (FRAGICLIC)
Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System in Primary Care for the Screening and Assessment of Frailty in Patients Aged 65 and Over: A Real-World Prospective Cohort Study
This observational study aims to evaluate the real-life use of a digital tool (Fragiclic) by general practitioners (GPs) and nurses to screen and assess frailty in adults aged 65 and over. Frailty is a syndrome that increases the risk of loss of autonomy, falls, hospitalizations, or death. The tool includes simple screening questionnaires (such as SEGAm) and a comprehensive assessment (CGA - Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment) to better manage patients' health.
The main question it aims to answer is:
- What proportion of patients aged 65 and over will benefit from frailty screening or assessment using Fragiclic over 12 months?
A secondary question is
- Does the use of Fragiclic reduce the risk of unplanned hospitalizations or death in these patients?
For the secondary question, researchers will compare patients who received screening or assessment (with or without a Personalized Care Plan (PCP)) to those who did not, to determine if Fragiclic improves their health outcomes.
Participants will not have additional tasks: Their GP or nurse will use Fragiclic during routine consultations. Some patients may be asked to provide information about their health or quality of life (via their healthcare provider).
All data will be collected anonymously and securely
Studieoversigt
Status
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Anslået)
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Léon BANH, Dr
- Telefonnummer: 01 60 17 65 65
- E-mail: leon.banh@u-pec.fr
Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup
- Navn: Fazia chelli, Mrs
- E-mail: f.chelli@cnge.fr
Studiesteder
-
-
Rue Charlie-Chaplin
-
Torcy, Rue Charlie-Chaplin, Frankrig, 77200
- MSPU Torcy
-
Kontakt:
- Léon Banh
- Telefonnummer: 01 60 17 65 65
- E-mail: leon_banh@hotmail.fr
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Prøveudtagningsmetode
Studiebefolkning
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 65 years or older
- Patient or trusted person who provided oral non-opposition after receiving full information about the protocol
- Managed by the general practitioner if the patient or nurse during the study period. If patients are assessed by a nurse : Patients whose general practitioner is a participating physician in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients unable to express non-opposition or without a trusted person available to express non-opposition
- Patients whose general practitioner (GP) is not a participating GP in the study
- Patients or trusted persons who do not speak French
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of patients who have benefited from at least one screening or frailty assessment associated with a personalized care plan
Tidsramme: From patient enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12+/-1 months
|
This includes the implementation of a screening and/or assessment, whether complete or incomplete (incomplete grid and/or incomplete or not performed PCP)
|
From patient enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12+/-1 months
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Rates of all-cause mortality and unplanned hospitalizations among patients included in the study
Tidsramme: From patient enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12+/-1 months
|
The rates of all-cause mortality and unplanned hospitalizations among patients included in the study, based on whether they underwent screening or assessment (complete or incomplete implementation) versus no implementation, and according to the assessment tool used within the Fragiclic site (SEGAm alone +/- PCP vs. CGA alone +/- PCP vs. SEGAm+CGA +/- PCP)
|
From patient enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12+/-1 months
|
|
Number, percentage, and type of personalized care plans prescribed based on the tool used and the degree of PCP implementation
Tidsramme: at 3 months after prescription
|
Number, percentage, and type of personalized care plans (PPS) prescribed based on the tool used (SEGAm alone vs. EGS alone vs. SEGAm + EGS), and the degree of PPS implementation (actions implemented)
|
at 3 months after prescription
|
|
Acceptability of the use of the Fragiclic platform among healthcare professionals (HCP) who are users and non-users
Tidsramme: at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
|
Feasibility (number of SEGAm, EGS, and PPS completed by users, completion time, patient refusals, number of users, and monthly logins) Perceived satisfaction with the use of the tool (qualitative study) Perceived usefulness of the tool (actions implemented, observed health outcomes) (qualitative study) Perceived difficulties in screening, frailty assessment, and implementing care and support actions (qualitative study)
|
at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
|
|
Socio-demographic profiles of healthcare professionals (HCP) who are users and non-users (age, gender, mode of practice) and usage profiles (number of logins, SEGAm, EGS, and PPS completed, average usage duration)
Tidsramme: at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
|
Socio-demographic profiles : age, gender, mode of practice Usage profile : number of logins, SEGAm, CGA, and PCP completed, average usage duration
|
at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
|
|
Number and percetange of complete implementation (patients with complete screening or assessment: complete frailty assessment grid and complete PPS)
Tidsramme: at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
|
Complete implementation = patients with complete screening or assessment: complete frailty assessment grid and complete PPS
|
at the end of patients follow-up, 12 months after enrollment
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Anslået)
Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)
Studieafslutning (Anslået)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- 2025-A00640-49
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .
Kliniske forsøg med Geriatrisk vurdering
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesAfsluttetSelf Geriatric Assessment Measure (SGAM)Forenede Stater
-
AdventHealthAfsluttetDudoenoscope Assessment ToolForenede Stater
-
University of Southern CaliforniaAfsluttetTotal Body Water AssessmentForenede Stater
-
Edwards LifesciencesAfsluttetHjerteoutput og Preload Assessment | LungevandsvurderingTyskland, Schweiz
-
Gözde Nur ErkanKırıkkale UniversityAfsluttetSelvevaluering | OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) | Instruktørvejledning | Intermediate Life Support | Tandlægestuderende | Peer AssessmentTyrkiet (Türkiye)
-
Pamukkale UniversityTilmelding efter invitationKognitiv vurdering | Elektrokonvulsiv terapi (ECT) | Elektrokonvulsiv Terapi Kognitiv Vurdering (ECCA) | Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) | Tyrkisk tilpasningTyrkiet (Türkiye)
-
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUkendtBeslagsfejlfrekvens | Limningstid pr. beslag | Adhæsive Remnant Index for Type of Bond Failure | Behandlingens længde | Peer Assessment Rating