Comparison of Orthodontic Bracket Bond Failure Using Acid Etching With or Without Sandblasting (AE SBE BF BB)

May 24, 2026 updated by: Tanzila Rafique

Comparison of Orthodontic Bracket Bond Failure Using Acid Etching With or Without Sandblasting Method for the Preparation of Enamel

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess if sandblasting before acid etching reduce orthodontic bracket bond failure in fixed orthodontic treatment. The main question it aims to answer is:

• What are the differences in bracket bond failure rate between acid etching with or without sandblasting method for the preparation of enamel? Researchers will compare acid etching with sandblasting method to acid etching without sandblasting method for enamel preparation to see if sandblasting prior to acid etching reduce bracket bond failure rate.

Participants will:

  • Receive sandblasting of enamel before acid etching on one side of the mouth and only acid etching on the contralateral side for enamel preparation.
  • Participants would visit at the the OPD of Hospital at 3 weeks interval for follow up and for a total duration of 4 months to assess the changes. The number of bracket bond dislodgements at each session will be recorded .

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1000
        • Bangladesh Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with good general health condition and oral hygiene status.
  2. Age range of the patients will be 18 years and above.
  3. Sex of the participants will be both male and female.
  4. Patients with full permanent dentition present (excluding 3rd molar).
  5. Patients with enamel integrity, absence of traumatic or carious lesion.
  6. Participants who had no enamel pretreatment procedure performed with chemical agents.
  7. Participants with no crossbite, scissor bite or occlusal interference (to prevent any potential early bond failure).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have congenital enamel defects,
  2. Patients who are in need of orthognathic surgery.
  3. Patients with craniofacial syndromes.
  4. Patients who present with partially erupted teeth with hypoplasia.
  5. Patients for whom a rapid expander or a fixed functional appliance will be planned.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Sandblasting
Sandblasting will be applied onto the vestibular surfaces of the teeth before applying the etchant
Sandblasting will be applied onto the vestibular surfaces of the teeth before applying the etchant;
Active Comparator: Acid Etching Alone
Only acid etching will be applied onto the vestibular surfaces of the teeth for enamel preparation.
Acid etching will be applied onto the vestibular surfaces of the teeth for enamel preparation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the bracket bond failure rate using acid etching with or without sandblasting method for the preparation of enamel.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mahmood Sajedeen, BDS, FCPS, Bangladesh Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BMU/2026/1641 (Other Identifier: Bangladesh Medical University (BMU))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Confidentiality and privacy will be preserved by utilizing unique identifying codes instead of personal identifiers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Bonding

Clinical Trials on Sandblasting with acid etching vs Acid etching alone

Subscribe