Effect of Er:YAG Laser on Hydrophilic Sealants

February 13, 2020 updated by: SULTAN KELES, Aydin Adnan Menderes University

The Effect of Er:YAG Laser on Clinical Success of a Hydrophilic Fissure Sealant

This study was conducted on 44 (19 girls and 25 boys) patients presenting 132 permanent first molars, who applied for oral examination to Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry. The patients involved in the study were aged between 7-11 years who had fully erupted permanent first molars, which were suitable for non-invasive fissure sealant application (narrow, deep fissures).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The permanent first molar teeth were cleaned using a polishing brush and pumice and isolated with cotton rolls. Caries status was assessed using DIAGNOdent pen (DIAGNOdent pen 2190, KaVo, Biberach, Germany) at the occlusal and proximal sites. Teeth having DIAGNOdent readings of 12 or less at the occlusal site and 7 or less at the proximal site were included in the study. Then, the teeth were divided into three groups. The first group (Grup A) of teeth were etched with phosphoric acid, the second group of teeth (Group L) were etched with Er:YAG laser and the third group of teeth (Group A+L) were etched with both Er:YAG laser and phosphoric acid. The patients were recalled for follow up examination at the 3rd, 6th and 9th months. The teeth were assessed using mouth mirror and explorer regarding new caries formation and retention of the fissure sealants. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 (SPSS 24.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aydın, Turkey, 09100
        • Hülya Yılmaz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who participated in this study had good general health and oral hygiene.
  • Fully erupted permanent first molar teeth with deep, narrow fissures
  • Teeth with no detectable occlusal and proximal caries

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypomineralized areas such as fluorosis, molar incisor hypomineralization
  • Allergy to resins, who were not willing to participate in the study.
  • Teeth with hypomineralized areas such as fluorosis,
  • Teeth with molar incisor hypomineralization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group L
The second group of teeth (Group L) were etched with Er:YAG laser.
Acid etching
Other Names:
  • Acid
Experimental: Group A+L
The third group of teeth (Group A+L) were etched with both Er:YAG laser and phosphoric acid.
Acid etching
Other Names:
  • Acid
No Intervention: Group A
The first group of teeth (Group A) were not etched with Er:YAG laser.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention rate
Time Frame: Change from Baseline retention rate at 12 months
Clinical success
Change from Baseline retention rate at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-048

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The results will be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fissure Sealant

Clinical Trials on Laser etching

3
Subscribe