External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Paediatric Upper Abdominal Surgeries

May 24, 2026 updated by: Belal Mohamed Bakr, Alexandria University

Ultrasound Guided External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Paediatric Upper Abdominal Surgeries

This study aims to compare between ultrasound guided external oblique intercostal plane block and ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block in paediatric upper abdominal surgeries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Paediatric nerve blocks are increasingly recognized as new standard for managing pain in children. The advantages of regional anesthesia in this population include enhanced operating conditions, expedited recovery of bowel function, and reduced postoperative pain.

The caudal epidural block remains the most used method; however, the external oblique intercostal block, a novel technique involves administering local anesthesia deep to the external oblique muscle at the sixth intercostal space, thereby blocking thoracoabdominal nerves from T6 to T10. This technique offers several advantages, including straightforward anatomy, a single muscle strip that is easily identifiable even in obese patients, a bony backstop, and an easily expandable fascial plane that can accommodate a catheter.

The erector spinae plane block involves injecting local anesthetic into the fascial plane beneath the erector spinae muscle at the tip of the vertebral transverse process. This allows the local anesthetic to spread in the craniocaudal fascial plane.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21526
        • Recruiting
        • Alexandria University
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wafaa M Shafshak, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ola M Zanaty, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mohamed W Nassar, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged between 6 and 12 years of both sex.
  • Patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II.
  • Patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries involving upper abdominal incisions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Guardian refusal.
  • Allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Surgical procedures exceeding 3 hours.
  • Infection at the area planned for the block injection.
  • Prolonged opioid medication.
  • Patients preoperatively medicated by Beta blockers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block.
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block.
Experimental: Group II
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block.
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of pain
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery

Postoperative pain will be assessed using Faces pain score revised. The Faces Pain Scale revised (FPS-R) is a validated self-report instrument designed to measure pain intensity in pediatric populations.

The scale comprises a series of facial expressions, ranging from a smiling face at 0, indicating "no pain," to a crying face at 10, indicating "very much pain".

Children are instructed to select the face that most accurately reflects their current pain level.

The faces are scored (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10), providing a quantifiable measure of pain intensity.

12 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate
Time Frame: Every 15 minutes intraoperative
Heart rate will be recorded preoperative basal readings, after induction of anesthesia, during skin incision, and every 15 minutes intraoperative.
Every 15 minutes intraoperative
Mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: Every 15 minutes intraoperative
Mean arterial blood pressure will be recorded preoperative basal readings, after induction of anesthesia, during skin incision, and every 15 minutes intraoperative.
Every 15 minutes intraoperative
Peripheral oxygen saturation
Time Frame: Every 15 minutes intraoperative
Peripheral oxygen saturation will be recorded preoperative basal readings, after induction of anesthesia, during skin incision, and every 15 minutes intraoperative.
Every 15 minutes intraoperative
Duration of analgesia
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
Duration of analgesia will be recorded from block completion till first postoperative rescue analgesia requirement.
12 hours after surgery
Total rescue analgesia requirement
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
In Faces Pain Scale score-revised, cut of points for analgesic requirement is ≧ 4, rescue analgesia will be administered in the form of nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg, with a maximum dose of 0.2 mg/kg.
12 hours after surgery
Incidence of complications
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
Incidence of complications including hematomas block failure, intravascular injection, pneumothorax or injection into the peritoneal cavity, with associated risks of damage to bowel and other abdominal viscera at the block site will be recorded.
12 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00012098 (0109306)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane Block

Clinical Trials on External oblique intercostal plane block

Subscribe