- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06441071
Patients' Positions on Analgesic Efficacy of ESPB
Effect of Different Patient's Positions on Postoperative Analgesia of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if patients remaining different positions for 30min after receiving ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block influenced the postoperative analgesia. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does patients maintain prone position or lateral position for 30 min after ESPB provided superior analgesic effect than in the supine position? Is ESPB not inferior to PVB considering postoperative opioid consumption ? Researchers will compare the opioid consumption 24h postoperatively among the patients remaining supine, lateral, prone position after ESPB and PVB to see if patients maintaining lateral or prone position provided excellent postoperative analgesia.
Participants will:
Maintaining supine lateral or prone position for 30 min following ESPB or receiving PVB.
Receiving postoperative NRS and QoR assessment
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
After signed the informed consent form, 200 patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic surgery were randomly divided into four groups: supine position group (group S, n = 50), prone position group (group P, n = 50), lateral position group (group L, n = 50) and paravertebral block group (group C, n = 50). After ESPB block, the corresponding position was maintained for 30 minutes.
Ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed 30min before general anesthesia. Ultrasound-guided ESPB methods: The ultrasonic high-frequency linear array probe (5-13 MHZ, Sonosite, USA) was placed parallel to the spine on the surface of the transverse process tip of the seventh thoracic vertebra. Under ultrasound, the transverse process and the surface of the erector spinae were clearly exposed. Then a long beved-plane needle was used, and the needle was inserted from the head side. 2ml of normal saline was injected using the water separation technique to confirm the position of the needle tip, and then 30ml 0.375% ropivacaine was injected.
After completion of the block, patients in group S were kept in the supine position for 30min, patients in group L were kept in the upper lateral position for 30min, and patients in group P were kept in the prone position for 30min. After 30 minutes of observation, an anesthesiologist who was unaware of the grouping used an ice cube to determine the extent of sensory block. General anesthesia was then performed.
General anesthesia was performed as follows: routine ECG monitoring was performed after the patient was admitted to the operating room, and invasive arterial blood pressure was monitored by radial artery puncture and catheterization. General anesthesia was induced with dexamethasone 10mg, midazolam 0.05mg.kg-1, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg.kg-1, sufentanil 0.2 ug.kg-1, cisatracurium 0.2 mg.kg-1, and then a double-luminal bronchial tube was inserted under a video laryngoscope and mechanically ventilated (tidal volume: 6-10ml.kg-1,PEEP: 3-5 cm H2O). Anesthesia was maintained with propofol (2-4 mg.kg-1.h-1), remifentanil (0.12-0.3 ug.kg-1.min-1) and Micuronium (0.6mg.kg-1.h-1). Intraoperative hemodynamics was maintained within 20% of baseline. Flurbiprofen axetil 50mg was given intravenously for analgesia and tropisetron 4mg was given to prevent nausea and vomiting when there were no contraindications during the operation. Oxycodone 3mg was administered intravenously 30min before the end of the procedure. At the end of the operation, the patient was transferred to PACU with an endotracheal tube. After neuromuscular blocking antagonism, the tracheal tube was extubated.
NRS was used to evaluate the pain scores at rest and during movement at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24h ,48h after operation by a nurse who was unaware of the grouping. Oxycodone 30mg diluted to 150ml was used for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after operation. The parameters of analgesia pump were set as background dose 0.5 ml.h-1, bolus 5ml, lockout time 8min. If NRS≥4 at rest after surgery, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was performed by pressing the PCA pump. When NRS≥4 at rest was still ≥4 after two times of PCA, oxycodone 1mg was given once as rescue analgesia, and the patients were reevaluated until NRS≤3.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Xinyi Bu, MD
- Phone Number: +86 18360868010
- Email: 1037031075@qq.com
Study Locations
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210006
- Recruiting
- Nanjing First Hospital
-
Contact:
- Xinyi Bu, MD
- Phone Number: +8618360868010
- Email: 1037031075@qq.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery under elective general anaesthesia were selected, regardless of sex, age 18-80 years, BMI: 18-30 kg.m-2, ASA classification I-III.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy to the study drug or allergy to local anaesthetics;
- History of opioid abuse;
- Previous nerve block puncture with puncture site infection;
- Peripheral neuropathy;
- Coagulation abnormalities, defined as prothrombin time or partial activation time prothrombin time exceeding standard values or international normalised ratio (INR) ≥ 1.4, or platelet count ≤ 70 x 109 L-1.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group S
After completion of the erector spinae plane block, patients in group S remained in the supine position for 30 minutes.
|
Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery were selected for the study, and nerve block was performed before surgery, followed by holding different positions for 30 min, after which the effect of the block was measured.
|
|
Experimental: Group L
After completion of the erector spinae plane block, patients in group L remained in the lateral position for 30 minutes.
|
Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery were selected for the study, and nerve block was performed before surgery, followed by holding different positions for 30 min, after which the effect of the block was measured.
|
|
Experimental: Group P
After completion of the erector spinae plane block, patients in group P remained in the prone position for 30 minutes.
|
Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery were selected for the study, and nerve block was performed before surgery, followed by holding different positions for 30 min, after which the effect of the block was measured.
|
|
Other: Group C
After completion of the paravertebral block, patients in group C remained in the supine position for 30 minutes.
|
Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery were selected for the study, and nerve block was performed before surgery, followed by holding different positions for 30 min, after which the effect of the block was measured.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Oxycodone dosage
Time Frame: 24 hour postoperatively
|
Cumulative oxycodone dosage 24 hour postoperatively
|
24 hour postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Loss to cold sensation of skin
Time Frame: 30 minute after block
|
The sensation to cold was assessed with ice.
The area include the anterior chest wall (midclavicular line), lateral chest wall (posterior axillary line), and posterior chest wall (paraspinal zone) by a researcher who was blinded to group allocation.
|
30 minute after block
|
|
NRS(Numeric Rating Scales) score
Time Frame: Postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour
|
Postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour NRS (Numeric Rating Scales) score.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS): This scale is composed of 11 numbers from 0 to 10, with higher numbers increasing the severity of pain.
|
Postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour
|
|
Adverse reaction
Time Frame: 24, 48 hour postoperatively
|
This includes dizziness, nausea, vomiting, etc.
|
24, 48 hour postoperatively
|
|
QoR-15 score(Quality of Recovery,QoR)
Time Frame: Day 1 and 2 postoperatively
|
Postoperative QoR-15(Quality of Recovery) score was used to evaluate the quality of early postoperative recovery on postoperative day 1 and 2. .
The QoR-15 score(Quality of Recovery,QoR) included 5 dimensions including emotional state, physical comfort, psychological support, physical independence and pain, with a total of 15 items.
Each item scored from 0 to 10, with higher scores being better.
|
Day 1 and 2 postoperatively
|
|
Opioid dosage
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour postoperatively
|
Postoperative opioid consumption dosage.
|
1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour postoperatively
|
|
Patient Comfort Scale score
Time Frame: 30 minute after block
|
used to assess the comfort level of the patient according to the position during the procedure (grade 0=help, 2=uncomfortable, 4=mild discomfort, 6=feeling OK, 8=pretty comfortable, and 10=feeling great)
|
30 minute after block
|
|
Hemodynamic profile
Time Frame: Heart rate changes before blockade, 5minute after blockade, 10 minute after blockade, 20minute after blockade, 30minute after blockade
|
Hemodynamic changes(Heart rate ) during blockade procedure
|
Heart rate changes before blockade, 5minute after blockade, 10 minute after blockade, 20minute after blockade, 30minute after blockade
|
|
Hemodynamic profile
Time Frame: Mean arterial pressure changes before blockade, 5minute after blockade, 10 minute after blockade, 20minute after blockade, 30minute after blockade
|
Hemodynamic changes(Mean arterial pressure ) during blockade procedure
|
Mean arterial pressure changes before blockade, 5minute after blockade, 10 minute after blockade, 20minute after blockade, 30minute after blockade
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Tao Shan, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- KY20240419-03
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane Block
-
Aycan KURTARANGİL DOĞANKutahya City HospitalNot yet recruitingLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy | Erector Spinae Plane Block | Plane Block
-
Medical University of WarsawCompleted
-
Harran UniversityCompletedErector Spinae Plane BlockTurkey
-
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityRecruiting
-
Medical University of WarsawWarsaw Clinical University CenterUnknown
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingErector Spinae Plane Block | Arthroscopy | Interscalene BlockEgypt
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityCompletedErector Spinae Plane Block | Radical CystectomyEgypt
-
Kasr El Aini HospitalCompletedErector Spinae Plane Block, Nephrolithotomy, HyaluronidaseEgypt
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityCompletedAnalgesia | Erector Spinae Plane Block | ArthroscopyEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingSurgery | Erector Spinae Plane Block | Cardiac | Recto-intercostal Fascial Plane Block | Pecto-intercostal Fascial Plane BlockEgypt
Clinical Trials on position
-
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityCompletedPosition | Comfort | Newborn, Infant, Disease | ResidualTurkey
-
Peking University People's HospitalNot yet recruitingStress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)China
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentNot yet recruitingThe Effect of Cuff Pressure on Postoperative Dysphagia
-
Ajou University School of MedicineCompletedIntubation;DifficultKorea, Republic of
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...RecruitingAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Prone PositionItaly
-
Luzerner KantonsspitalCompletedInfant, Premature, Diseases | Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) | Infant, Newborn, Disease | Acute BronchiolitisSwitzerland
-
Dallas VA Medical CenterCompleted
-
Karaman Training and Research HospitalCompletedIntubation; Difficult or FailedTurkey
-
Menoufia UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Sibel Serap CeylanCompletedPain | Stress | Enteral Feeding IntoleranceTurkey