Patients' Positions on Analgesic Efficacy of ESPB

Effect of Different Patient's Positions on Postoperative Analgesia of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if patients remaining different positions for 30min after receiving ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block influenced the postoperative analgesia. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does patients maintain prone position or lateral position for 30 min after ESPB provided superior analgesic effect than in the supine position? Is ESPB not inferior to PVB considering postoperative opioid consumption ? Researchers will compare the opioid consumption 24h postoperatively among the patients remaining supine, lateral, prone position after ESPB and PVB to see if patients maintaining lateral or prone position provided excellent postoperative analgesia.

Participants will:

Maintaining supine lateral or prone position for 30 min following ESPB or receiving PVB.

Receiving postoperative NRS and QoR assessment

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

After signed the informed consent form, 200 patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic surgery were randomly divided into four groups: supine position group (group S, n = 50), prone position group (group P, n = 50), lateral position group (group L, n = 50) and paravertebral block group (group C, n = 50). After ESPB block, the corresponding position was maintained for 30 minutes.

Ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed 30min before general anesthesia. Ultrasound-guided ESPB methods: The ultrasonic high-frequency linear array probe (5-13 MHZ, Sonosite, USA) was placed parallel to the spine on the surface of the transverse process tip of the seventh thoracic vertebra. Under ultrasound, the transverse process and the surface of the erector spinae were clearly exposed. Then a long beved-plane needle was used, and the needle was inserted from the head side. 2ml of normal saline was injected using the water separation technique to confirm the position of the needle tip, and then 30ml 0.375% ropivacaine was injected.

After completion of the block, patients in group S were kept in the supine position for 30min, patients in group L were kept in the upper lateral position for 30min, and patients in group P were kept in the prone position for 30min. After 30 minutes of observation, an anesthesiologist who was unaware of the grouping used an ice cube to determine the extent of sensory block. General anesthesia was then performed.

General anesthesia was performed as follows: routine ECG monitoring was performed after the patient was admitted to the operating room, and invasive arterial blood pressure was monitored by radial artery puncture and catheterization. General anesthesia was induced with dexamethasone 10mg, midazolam 0.05mg.kg-1, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg.kg-1, sufentanil 0.2 ug.kg-1, cisatracurium 0.2 mg.kg-1, and then a double-luminal bronchial tube was inserted under a video laryngoscope and mechanically ventilated (tidal volume: 6-10ml.kg-1,PEEP: 3-5 cm H2O). Anesthesia was maintained with propofol (2-4 mg.kg-1.h-1), remifentanil (0.12-0.3 ug.kg-1.min-1) and Micuronium (0.6mg.kg-1.h-1). Intraoperative hemodynamics was maintained within 20% of baseline. Flurbiprofen axetil 50mg was given intravenously for analgesia and tropisetron 4mg was given to prevent nausea and vomiting when there were no contraindications during the operation. Oxycodone 3mg was administered intravenously 30min before the end of the procedure. At the end of the operation, the patient was transferred to PACU with an endotracheal tube. After neuromuscular blocking antagonism, the tracheal tube was extubated.

NRS was used to evaluate the pain scores at rest and during movement at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24h ,48h after operation by a nurse who was unaware of the grouping. Oxycodone 30mg diluted to 150ml was used for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after operation. The parameters of analgesia pump were set as background dose 0.5 ml.h-1, bolus 5ml, lockout time 8min. If NRS≥4 at rest after surgery, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was performed by pressing the PCA pump. When NRS≥4 at rest was still ≥4 after two times of PCA, oxycodone 1mg was given once as rescue analgesia, and the patients were reevaluated until NRS≤3.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210006
        • Recruiting
        • Nanjing First Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery under elective general anaesthesia were selected, regardless of sex, age 18-80 years, BMI: 18-30 kg.m-2, ASA classification I-III.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Allergy to the study drug or allergy to local anaesthetics;
  2. History of opioid abuse;
  3. Previous nerve block puncture with puncture site infection;
  4. Peripheral neuropathy;
  5. Coagulation abnormalities, defined as prothrombin time or partial activation time prothrombin time exceeding standard values or international normalised ratio (INR) ≥ 1.4, or platelet count ≤ 70 x 109 L-1.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group S
After completion of the erector spinae plane block, patients in group S remained in the supine position for 30 minutes.
Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery were selected for the study, and nerve block was performed before surgery, followed by holding different positions for 30 min, after which the effect of the block was measured.
Experimental: Group L
After completion of the erector spinae plane block, patients in group L remained in the lateral position for 30 minutes.
Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery were selected for the study, and nerve block was performed before surgery, followed by holding different positions for 30 min, after which the effect of the block was measured.
Experimental: Group P
After completion of the erector spinae plane block, patients in group P remained in the prone position for 30 minutes.
Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery were selected for the study, and nerve block was performed before surgery, followed by holding different positions for 30 min, after which the effect of the block was measured.
Other: Group C
After completion of the paravertebral block, patients in group C remained in the supine position for 30 minutes.
Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery were selected for the study, and nerve block was performed before surgery, followed by holding different positions for 30 min, after which the effect of the block was measured.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Oxycodone dosage
Time Frame: 24 hour postoperatively
Cumulative oxycodone dosage 24 hour postoperatively
24 hour postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Loss to cold sensation of skin
Time Frame: 30 minute after block
The sensation to cold was assessed with ice. The area include the anterior chest wall (midclavicular line), lateral chest wall (posterior axillary line), and posterior chest wall (paraspinal zone) by a researcher who was blinded to group allocation.
30 minute after block
NRS(Numeric Rating Scales) score
Time Frame: Postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour
Postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour NRS (Numeric Rating Scales) score. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS): This scale is composed of 11 numbers from 0 to 10, with higher numbers increasing the severity of pain.
Postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour
Adverse reaction
Time Frame: 24, 48 hour postoperatively
This includes dizziness, nausea, vomiting, etc.
24, 48 hour postoperatively
QoR-15 score(Quality of Recovery,QoR)
Time Frame: Day 1 and 2 postoperatively
Postoperative QoR-15(Quality of Recovery) score was used to evaluate the quality of early postoperative recovery on postoperative day 1 and 2. . The QoR-15 score(Quality of Recovery,QoR) included 5 dimensions including emotional state, physical comfort, psychological support, physical independence and pain, with a total of 15 items. Each item scored from 0 to 10, with higher scores being better.
Day 1 and 2 postoperatively
Opioid dosage
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour postoperatively
Postoperative opioid consumption dosage.
1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour postoperatively
Patient Comfort Scale score
Time Frame: 30 minute after block
used to assess the comfort level of the patient according to the position during the procedure (grade 0=help, 2=uncomfortable, 4=mild discomfort, 6=feeling OK, 8=pretty comfortable, and 10=feeling great)
30 minute after block
Hemodynamic profile
Time Frame: Heart rate changes before blockade, 5minute after blockade, 10 minute after blockade, 20minute after blockade, 30minute after blockade
Hemodynamic changes(Heart rate ) during blockade procedure
Heart rate changes before blockade, 5minute after blockade, 10 minute after blockade, 20minute after blockade, 30minute after blockade
Hemodynamic profile
Time Frame: Mean arterial pressure changes before blockade, 5minute after blockade, 10 minute after blockade, 20minute after blockade, 30minute after blockade
Hemodynamic changes(Mean arterial pressure ) during blockade procedure
Mean arterial pressure changes before blockade, 5minute after blockade, 10 minute after blockade, 20minute after blockade, 30minute after blockade

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tao Shan, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane Block

Clinical Trials on position

Subscribe