3D Mapping Versus Conventional Ablation in AVNRT (MAP-AVNRT)

June 1, 2026 updated by: Soha Mahmoud Ali Elshibly, Kafrelsheikh University

Three-Dimensional Electroanatomical Mapping Versus Conventional Fluoroscopy-Guided Slow Pathway Ablation for Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia: A Prospective Randomized Study

This prospective randomized interventional study compared conventional fluoroscopy-guided slow pathway ablation versus three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping-guided ablation in patients with electrophysiologically confirmed typical atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). A total of 108 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 80 eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either conventional fluoroscopic ablation or 3D mapping-guided ablation. Following post-randomization dropouts, the final analysis included 38 patients in the conventional group and 36 patients in the 3D mapping group. The study evaluated fluoroscopy exposure, procedural efficacy, complete slow pathway elimination, procedural success, complications, and arrhythmia recurrence during follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is one of the most common forms of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Catheter ablation targeting the slow AV nodal pathway is considered definitive therapy with high procedural success rates.

Conventional fluoroscopy-guided ablation mainly relies on anatomical landmarks and intracardiac electrogram interpretation. However, fluoroscopy exposure remains an important concern for both patients and operators. Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems allow detailed reconstruction of the triangle of Koch and facilitate substrate-guided ablation using voltage, activation, and fractionated electrogram mapping techniques. These systems may reduce fluoroscopy exposure and improve procedural precision and efficacy.

This prospective randomized two-arm interventional study was conducted at the Cardiology Department, Kafr El-Sheikh University Hospital, between December 2023 and November 2025. A total of 108 consecutive patients with symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia suggestive of AVNRT were screened for eligibility. Following assessment according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 80 eligible patients with electrophysiologically confirmed typical AVNRT were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either conventional fluoroscopy-guided slow pathway ablation (Conventional group, n = 40) or three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping-guided slow pathway ablation (3D group, n = 40).

During the study period, post-randomization dropouts and exclusions occurred in both groups. Consequently, the final analysis included 38 patients in the conventional ablation group and 36 patients in the 3D mapping-guided ablation group.

In the conventional arm, ablation was performed using standard fluoroscopic anatomical landmarks and intracardiac electrogram criteria within the triangle of Koch. In the 3D mapping arm, high-density electroanatomical mapping using CARTO or EnSite X systems was performed with integrated voltage, activation, and fractionated electrogram mapping to identify optimal ablation targets.

Primary outcomes included fluoroscopy time, fluoroscopy dose, complete slow pathway elimination, and procedural success defined as non-inducibility of sustained AVNRT after ablation. Secondary outcomes included total procedure duration, number and duration of radiofrequency applications, complications, recurrence during follow-up, hospital stay duration, need for redo ablation, and predictors of complete slow pathway elimination.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate
      • Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, 11355
        • Kafr Elsheikh Univfersity Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sustained symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia with surface ECG features highly suggestive of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
  • Electrophysiologically confirmed typical (slow-fast) AVNRT during the index electrophysiology study.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coexisting arrhythmia requiring concurrent catheter ablation during the same procedure.
  • Non-inducible AVNRT at the time of electrophysiological study.
  • Antiarrhythmic drug use within 48 hours before the procedure or ongoing amiodarone therapy.
  • Hemodynamic instability precluding safe catheter manipulation.
  • Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Fluoroscopy-Guided Ablation
Patients underwent conventional fluoroscopy-guided slow pathway ablation using standard anatomical landmarks and intracardiac electrogram criteria within the triangle of Koch.
Conventional fluoroscopy-guided catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway using anatomical landmarks and intracardiac electrogram criteria within the triangle of Koch.
Other Names:
  • Conventional Fluoroscopy-Guided Ablation
Experimental: 3D Electroanatomical Mapping-Guided Ablation
Patients underwent three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping-guided slow pathway ablation using CARTO or EnSite X systems with integrated voltage, activation, and fractionated electrogram mapping.
Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping-guided catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway using CARTO or EnSite X systems with voltage and activation mapping guidance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Fluoroscopy Radiation Dose During Catheter Ablation
Time Frame: At completion of the index ablation procedure
Total fluoroscopy radiation dose measured during the catheter ablation procedure, reported in mGy.
At completion of the index ablation procedure
Total Fluoroscopy Exposure Time During Catheter Ablation
Time Frame: At completion of the index ablation procedure
Total duration of fluoroscopy exposure during the catheter ablation procedure, reported in minutes.
At completion of the index ablation procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Complete Slow Pathway Elimination
Time Frame: At completion of the index ablation procedure
Complete abolition of slow pathway conduction and disappearance of the anterograde AH jump following catheter ablation.
At completion of the index ablation procedure
Number of Participants with Acute Procedural Success
Time Frame: At completion of the index ablation procedure
Acute procedural success defined as non-inducibility of sustained AVNRT after catheter ablation under baseline conditions and following isoproterenol infusion.
At completion of the index ablation procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 23, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plans have not yet been finalized at the time of study registration.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)

Clinical Trials on Conventional Slow Pathway Ablation

Subscribe