Large Language Model-Driven Personalization of Virtual Reality Interventions to Improve Pediatric Inpatient Experience and Reduce Needle Anxiety (LLM-audiobook)

June 3, 2026 updated by: Samuel Rodriguez, Stanford University

Hospitalization strips pediatric patients of the environments, objects, and people that shape their daily lives. Hospitalized pediatric patients routinely experience painful procedures, psychological distress, boredom, and a disorienting loss of personal identity. These experiences measurably worsen anxiety, reduce cooperation with care, and diminish the quality of the inpatient experience for both patients and families.1-7 Immersive digital interventions, including VR and tablet-based experiences, have emerged as a promising class of tools for addressing these challenges. Prior studies from The Stanford Chariot Program have demonstrated that digitally delivered, patient-centered experiences can meaningfully reduce procedural anxiety and improve engagement in hospitalized children.8-12

Yet, an important limitation persists in these technologies - current digital interventions largely remain in one-size-fits-all formats. Every child receives the same content, regardless of who they are, what they love, or what makes them feel at home in the world. This design limits therapeutic relevance, constrains engagement, and represents a missed opportunity to engage children, reduce anxiety, and enhance their quality of life during hospital stays.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English-speaking patients admitted for ≥24 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute medical instability
  • Contact or airborne isolation precautions (precluding shared device use)
  • Vision or hearing impairment
  • Severe cognitive or developmental impairment
  • Active seizure disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pediatric patient

Develop and refine a two-stage personalization LLM pipeline: (1) a structured brief interview template and (2) an LLM prompt chain for content generation. The interview instrument will be a structured guide (~20 minutes) capturing details about the child's background, interests, and aspirations. All information collected during the interview will be deidentified prior to being passed into the LLM.

Content Generation: Deidentified interview responses will be input to a standardized LLM prompt pipeline. The pipeline generates a structured patient profile that interprets the participant's interests, personality, and preferences, then uses that profile to produce a personalized narrative, formatted as a picture book story. AI voice synthesis will generate an audio narration of the story. AI image generation tools will produce a set of 6-10 accompanying illustrations. The final product - a synchronized audio picture book - will be delivered via VR headset at bedside.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the acceptability of the Large Language Model generated audiobook
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention
Semi-structured focus group interviews conducted in person immediately after intervention. Six core questions plus probing prompts assessing attitudes and opinions, and perceptions of the intervention experience
Immediately after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Samuel Rodriguez, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 87422

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Large Language Model

Clinical Trials on LLM-audiobook

Subscribe