Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Photogrammetry

June 7, 2026 updated by: Mohammed El-Sawy, Menoufia University

Accuracy of Complete-arch Implant Scans Obtained Using Intraoral Photogrammetry and a Mobile-phone Based Photogrammetry.

This prospective comparative clinical study evaluated the accuracy and chairside time of complete-arch implant scans obtained using an intraoral photogrammetry system and a mobile-phone-based photogrammetry system in edentulous patients rehabilitated with complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Implant positions recorded by each system were compared with a reference dataset to assess linear and angular discrepancies. The chairside time required for data acquisition was also measured. The study aimed to determine whether mobile-phone-based photogrammetry can provide clinically acceptable accuracy comparable to that of intraoral photogrammetry while improving clinical efficiency. The findings may help clinicians select appropriate digital impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Accurate recording of implant positions is essential for the passive fit and long-term success of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Photogrammetry-based technologies have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional digital impression techniques for capturing implant positions with high accuracy. While intraoral photogrammetry systems have demonstrated favorable results, the clinical performance of recently introduced mobile-phone-based photogrammetry systems remains insufficiently investigated.

This prospective comparative clinical study aims to evaluate the accuracy and chairside time of complete-arch implant scans obtained using an intraoral photogrammetry system and a mobile-phone-based photogrammetry system in edentulous patients restored with complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Each participant will undergo implant scanning using both systems according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The resulting digital datasets will be compared with a reference dataset to determine scan accuracy.

The primary outcome measures will be linear and angular discrepancies between the implant positions captured by each photogrammetry system and the reference dataset. Secondary outcome measures will include the chairside time required for scan acquisition. Statistical analyses will be performed to compare the accuracy and efficiency of the evaluated systems.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will consist of adult completely edentulous patients who have been rehabilitated with implant-supported complete-arch prostheses. Eligible participants will present with a fully edentulous arch restored by at least four osseointegrated dental implants and will be recruited from patients seeking prosthodontic treatment and follow-up care at the study center. All participants will undergo complete-arch implant scanning using both an intraoral photogrammetry system and a mobile-phone-based photogrammetry system for comparative evaluation of scan accuracy and chairside acquisition time. Only patients meeting the predefined inclusion criteria and providing written informed consent will be enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Completely edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported complete-arch prostheses.
  • Presence of at least four osseointegrated implants in the edentulous arch.
  • Patients able to undergo digital implant scanning procedures.
  • Patients willing to participate and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with unstable or failed implants.
  • Presence of peri-implant disease, active oral infection, or significant soft-tissue inflammation around the implants.
  • Inadequate access for placement of photogrammetry scan bodies or markers.
  • Patients with conditions that prevent proper scanning procedures (e.g., inability to maintain mouth opening or remain still during data acquisition).
  • Patients requiring immediate implant placement or immediate loading protocols.
  • Patients unwilling or unable to provide informed consent.
  • Incomplete clinical records or inability to complete all study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Intraoral Photogrammetry (IPG)
Participants will undergo complete-arch implant scanning using an intraoral photogrammetry system (IPF Elite, Shining 3D). Implant positions will be digitally recorded according to the manufacturer's instructions. Linear and angular discrepancies relative to the reference dataset, as well as chairside scanning time, will be evaluated.
A photogrammetry-based digital impression system used to capture the three-dimensional positions of implants in complete-arch rehabilitations. The system records implant locations through specialized scan bodies and generates a digital dataset for subsequent accuracy analysis.
Other Names:
  • IPF Elite; Shining 3D; Intraoral Photogrammetry System
Mobile-Phone-Based Photogrammetry
Participants will undergo complete-arch implant scanning using a mobile-phone-based photogrammetry system (T-Marker). Implant positions will be digitally recorded according to the manufacturer's instructions. Linear and angular discrepancies relative to the reference dataset, as well as chairside scanning time, will be evaluated.
A smartphone-assisted photogrammetry system used to capture the three-dimensional positions of implants in complete-arch rehabilitations. The system acquires photographic data through coded markers and generates a digital dataset for subsequent accuracy analysis.
Other Names:
  • T-Marker; Extraoral Photogrammetry; Mobile-Phone-Based Photogrammetry System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Linear Discrepancy of Complete-Arch Implant Scans
Time Frame: Immediately after scan acquisition and digital analysis (same study visit).
Assessment of the linear deviation (μm) between implant positions captured using intraoral photogrammetry and mobile-phone-based photogrammetry systems and those recorded in the reference dataset. Lower values indicate greater accuracy.
Immediately after scan acquisition and digital analysis (same study visit).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohammed A. El-Sawy, PhD, Menoufia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Up on resonable request from the corresponding author

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Edentulous Jaw

Clinical Trials on Intraoral Photogrammetry (IPG)

Subscribe