Brady MX a Quality Improvement Study

September 18, 2019 updated by: Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

Registry to Improve the Adoption of Consensus Treatment Guideline (Brady MX)

Medtronic is sponsoring a quality improvement study called Brady MX. It is hypothesized that lack of awareness of treatment and diagnostics pathways result in lower number of referrals to implanters of IPG.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

113

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Colima, Mexico, 28019
        • Hospital Regional Universitario de Colima
      • Queretaro, Mexico, 76170
        • Hospital General de Queretaro
    • Baja California
      • Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico, 22000
        • Hospital General de Tijuana
    • Quintana Roo
      • Cancún, Quintana Roo, Mexico, 77524
        • Hospital General de Cancun
    • Sonora
      • Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico, 83000
        • Hospital General del Estado de Sonora

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Bradycardia symptomatic patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient at least 18 years of age
  • Patient´s heart rate meets at least one of the following:

Patient has a sinus rate ≤ 50 OR a junctional escape rhythm no faster than 50 Patient has a history of exercise intolerance

  • Patient complains of general fatigue, shortness of breath, shortness of breath with exertion, syncope, light headed dizziness, palpitations, lethargy, dyspnea OR malaise within the last 30 days that are not related to other discovered causes (such as untreated hypothyroidism or anemia)
  • Patient (or patient´s legally authorized representative) is willing and able to sign and date written Patient Consent Form/Data Release Form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has recent history of blood loss
  • Patient has a medical history leading to suspicion of neurological disorder
  • Patient has a history of Chronic Atrial Fibrilation
  • Patient is enrolled or planing to participate in a concurrent drug and/or device study at any time during the course of this clinical study without documented pre-approval from Medtronic study manager
  • Patient is not expected to survive 12 months
  • Patient is anticipated to be unwilling or unable to comply with the clinical investigation plan

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute Change in the Proportion of Subjects Diagnosed With SND at Pre Specific Time.
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Because the study intervention was not conducted, it is not possible to compare the proportion of subjects with an SND diagnosis pre-intervention (Phase I) to the proportion post-intervention (Phase II). Instead, the proportion of subjects with an SND diagnosis in Phase I are reported
6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of SND Subjects Receiving a Referral for an Indicated IPG Device After the Intervention
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 15 months

The change between subjects referred to an indicated IPG will be measured after the intervention in total number of patients that are referred correctly.

Because the study intervention was not conducted, it is not possible to compare the proportion of subjects receiving therapy referral for an indicated IPG pre-intervention (Phase I) to the proportion post-intervention (Phase II). Instead, the proportion of SND subjects receiving a referral for an indicated IPG device in Phase I are reported.

3, 6, and 15 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sinus Node Disfunction

Clinical Trials on IPG

3
Subscribe