Clinical Examination of Cavovarus Feet

Identification of Forefoot Morphotypes in Cavovarus Feet Without the Need for Specialised Software

Cavovarus feet are complex deformities in multiple planes. There is little consensus on the best way to address deformities. Furthermore there are various different phenotypes and we have previously described 4 distinct forefoot morphotypes that exist. It has been hypothesised that the various morphotypes could benefit from differing surgical strategies.

However, identification of forefoot morphotypes has only been possible thus far using specialised semi-automated software and 3D animating software to manually identify morphotypes. It is therefore not straightforward to identify which patients may benefit from which surgery and this is not translatable to surgeons outside of a specialist centre.

The utility of this classification has been thus far limited to research. There is a burning need to explore ways in which identification of forefoot morphotypes can be translated to other centres using techniques such as basic imaging or clinical examination to identify patients with different morphotypes.

At Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH) we have a large, complex cohort of patients with neuromuscular foot and ankle deformity and cavovarus feet. We also have access to advanced imaging techniques which we employ in routine care of our patients. We further have access to the software and previous research tools used to identify forefoot morphotypes.

We have for many years been examining cavovarus feet and documenting the various clinical findings. We also run teaching clinics combined with registrars where patients are routinely examined as part of routine care and pre-operative work up.

Therefore we are ideally and uniquely placed to carry out this research which is an extension of our previous work. Our primary aim is to identify a reproducible method of distinguishing between the various forefoot morphotypes in cavovarus feet in patients with Charcot Marie Tooth disease (CMT). This will include investigating the utility of clinical examination and manual measurements (without specialised software) on weightbearing CT (WBCT). We will also aim to examine the reproducibility of any techniques such as clinical examination.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with CMT and cavovarus feet

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged ≥ 18 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of cavovarus foot deformity, AND confirmed Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease or other hereditary sensorimotor neuropathy
  • Already under the care of the Foot & Ankle Unit at RNOH.

Additionally, for PROSPECTIVE element:

• Capacity to provide written informed consent

Additionally, for the RETROSPECTIVE element:

  • Previously assessed for cavovarus feet at RNOH
  • Forefoot morphotype previously identified using Disior Bonelogic software
  • Clinical examination findings documented in medical notes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgery to the hindfoot or midfoot
  • Age under 18 years

For the PROSPECTIVE element:

• Unable to consent

For the RETROSPECTIVE element:

  • Participant has previously withdrawn consent for use of their data in line with NHS Opt-out
  • Insufficient clinical examination data recorded in medical notes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cavovarus Feet
Patients with cavovarus feet and Charcot Marie Tooth
Clinical examination as part of routine care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of reproducibility of clinical examination
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karan Malhotra, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 28, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cavus Foot

Clinical Trials on Clinical Examination

Subscribe