Association of Ultrasonographic Temporal Artery Lesions and Relapse in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis (ALERT)

March 18, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Brest
Ultrasound evaluation of the temporal and axillary arteries is currently well recognized in the field of giant cell arteritis (GCA), a disease primarily affecting medium- and large-caliber vessels. Structural ultrasound abnormalities are now well described in this pathology, but their association with relapse and clinical concordance is unknown. There is currently a follow-up score (the OGUS score) for medium- and large-caliber arteries that could also predict the clinical course of the disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospective bicentric longitudinal study evaluating the association between ultrasound lesions and clinico-biological relapse in patients with giant cell arteritis.

This is a non-interventional study with patients routinely followed for their pathology and classically benefiting from temporal artery ultrasound as part of their disease. Recruitment will be facilitated by the fact that these will be "general population" patients with suspected giant cell arteritis.

The center will enroll 100 patients. The study will take place over 3 visits, including a clinical, biological and ultrasound examination. Ultrasound will not be blinded to the clinic, so we will only need one examiner in the center.

This is a study in routine care, with no additional costs and no expected constraints. The ultrasound examination will be performed as part of their routine follow-up.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Brest, France, 29200
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Brest
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sandrine Pr JOUSSE-JOULIN
      • Quimper, France, 29107

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with giant cell arteritis at disease diagnosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major patient
  • Patients meeting ACR 2022 criteria for giant cell arteritis.
  • No opposition expressed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to understand the protocol, under guardianship or curatorship.
  • Patients not affiliated to the French Social Security system.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients with giant cell arteritis at diagnosis
patients routinely monitored for their disease, and who typically benefit from temporal artery ultrasound as part of their disease. Recruitment will be facilitated by the fact that these are "general population" patients with suspected giant cell arteritis.
examination performed as part of routine care
examination performed as part of routine care
examination performed as part of routine care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapse according to EULAR 2018 criteria
Time Frame: At 12 months
Relapse is defined with European League Against Rheumatism recommendations according to major or minor relapse criteria.
At 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapse according to EULAR 2018 criteria
Time Frame: At 6 month; at 12 month
Relapse is defined with European League Against Rheumatism recommendations according to major or minor relapse criteria.
At 6 month; at 12 month
OMERACT Giant Cells arteritis Ultrasonography Score (OGUS)
Time Frame: At 6 month, at 12 month
It is a score for ultrasound monitoring of temporal arteries by measuring the intima media complex of 8 vascular sites (common temporal trunk, frontal and parietal branches, axillary arteries). If OGUS score is >= 1, the criteria is YES, if OGUS score < 1, the criteria is NO
At 6 month, at 12 month
C-Reactive Protein
Time Frame: At 6 month, at 12 month
It is a biological marker expressed in mg/L. If CRP >=10 mg/L, the criteria is YES. If CRF < 10 mg/L, the criteria is NO
At 6 month, at 12 month
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Time Frame: At 6 month, at 12 month
It is a blood test that can show the inflammation in the body, in mm/hour. If ESR >= 15 mm/h, the criteria is YES. If ESR < 15 mm/h, the criteria is NO.
At 6 month, at 12 month
Clinical parameter : Age
Time Frame: At inclusion
One Clinical parameter is defined with the dichotomised variable : age > 50 years (YES) and age <=50 years (NO)
At inclusion
Other prognostic marker : C-Reactive Protein
Time Frame: At inclusion, At 6 month, At 12 month
Pronostic markers are defined with C-Reactive Protein (in mg/L)
At inclusion, At 6 month, At 12 month
Clinical parameter : loss of vision
Time Frame: At inclusion
One Clinical parameter is defined with the sudden loss of vision (YES/NO)
At inclusion
Clinical parameter : claudication of the jaw or tongue
Time Frame: At inclusion
One Clinical parameter is defined with the claudication of the jaw or tongue (YES/NO)
At inclusion
Clinical parameter : temporal headaches
Time Frame: At inclusion
One Clinical parameter is defined with the temporal headaches (YES/NO)
At inclusion
Clinical parameter : scalp paresthesia
Time Frame: At inclusion
One Clinical parameter is defined with the scalp paresthesia (YES/NO)
At inclusion
Clinical parameter : abnormal palpation of the temporal arteries
Time Frame: At inclusion
One Clinical parameter is defined with the abnormal palpation of the temporal arteries (YES/NO)
At inclusion
Clinical parameter : morning stiffness of shoulders and/or neck
Time Frame: At inclusion
One Clinical parameter is defined with morning stiffness of shoulders and/or neck (YES/NO)
At inclusion
Biological parameter : temporal artery biopsy
Time Frame: At inclusion
One biological parameter is defined with positive temporal artery biopsy (YES/NO)
At inclusion
Biological parameter : halo sign on ultrasound
Time Frame: At inclusion
One biological parameter is defined with halo sign on ultrasound (Present/Absent)
At inclusion
Biological parameter : bilateral axillary involvement
Time Frame: At inclusion
One biological parameter is defined with bilateral axillary involvement (occlusion or stenosis visualized on ultrasound or CT angio or PET scan or MRI)(Present/Absent)
At inclusion
Biological parameter : aortitis
Time Frame: At inclusion
One biological parameter is defined with aortitis on PET scans of the thoracic or abdominal descending aorta (Present/Absent)
At inclusion
Biological parameter : Sedimentation rate
Time Frame: At inclusion
One biological parameter is defined with Sedimentation rate >= 50 mm/hour (YES/NO)
At inclusion
Biological parameter : C-Reactive Protein
Time Frame: At inclusion
One biological parameter is defined with C-Reactive Protein >= 10 mg/L at the first hour (YES/NO)
At inclusion
Other prognostic marker : hemoglobin
Time Frame: At inclusion, At 6 month, At 12 month
Pronostic markers are defined with hemoglobin (in g/dL)
At inclusion, At 6 month, At 12 month
Other prognostic marker : leukocytes
Time Frame: At inclusion, At 6 month, At 12 month
Pronostic markers are defined with leukocytes (in giga/L)
At inclusion, At 6 month, At 12 month
Other prognostic markers : platelets
Time Frame: At inclusion, At 6 month, At 12 month
Pronostic markers are defined with platelets (in giga/L)
At inclusion, At 6 month, At 12 month
Other prognostic marker : Sedimentation rate
Time Frame: At inclusion, At 6 month, At 12 month
Pronostic markers are defined with Sedimentation rate (in mm/hour)
At inclusion, At 6 month, At 12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All collected data that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning three years and ending fifteen years following the final study report completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest UH. Requestors will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Giant Cell Arteritis

Clinical Trials on clinical examination

Subscribe