Microvideos for Improving HPV Vaccination Among Childhood Cancer Survivors

June 9, 2026 updated by: University of Utah

This exploratory mixed-methods study aims to examine receipt of treatment and decision-making among rural cancer patients in Utah. Guided by Conceptual Model of Healthcare Access, the study will integrate, survey and cancer registry data with patient interviews to better understand how travel burden, socioeconomic conditions, health literacy, and other contextual factors shape treatment location and access to care . While the setting of this research is specific to Utah, a state with vast rural regions and only one National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer center, the findings may inform policy and practice improvements in other states with similar geographic and healthcare infrastructure. Thus, the study has potential relevance for advancing rural cancer equity nationwide.

Understanding how rural cancer patients make treatment decisions is essential to addressing persistent disparities in cancer care access and outcomes. While geographic barriers and structural inequities are well-documented, less is known about the individual and contextual factors that shape patients' choices about where and how to receive treatment. This mixed-methods study will examine receipt of treatment, decision-making, and patient experience among rural cancer patients in Utah, with attention to travel burden, referral pathways, health literacy, and perceived barriers to care.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • Recruiting
        • University of Utah
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Echo Warner, MPH, PhD, SB

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible participants include cancer survivors who are currently ages 18-26 years and who were diagnosed with childhood cancer (ages 0-26 at diagnosis) in the past ten years.
  • Currently use Facebook or willing to create a Facebook account to use for the duration of the study.
  • At the time of enrollment, have not completed all recommended doses of the HPV vaccine.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to speak and understand English.
  • Participants who take part in the Aim 1 focus groups will be ineligible for the Aim 2 social media group.
  • Participants who are fully vaccinated for HPV will be ineligible as the goal of Aim 2 is to evaluate the feasibility of the social media campaign for improving vaccine intention among HPV unvaccinated individuals.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: HPV Vaccination Education
Microvideos are designed to be <2 minutes long and to address key information on a topic in an engaging and concise manner. HPV vaccine education will be provided to unvaccinated emerging adult survivors of childhood cancer through a pilot quasi-experimental social media intervention.
To educate survivors of childhood cancers about a key cancer prevention strategy, HPV vaccination. The core microvideos will focus on the 5 Ws of HPV vaccination: Who should get vaccinated, What HPV vaccination protects against, When to get vaccinated, Where to access the vaccine, Why it matters-designed particularly for cancer survivors.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Microvideo education
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Feasibility will be defined as ≥80% of participants completing the intervention and study surveys.
up to 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of Microvideo Education
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks

Acceptability will be summarized using means, standard deviations, and proportions of participants indicating strong agreement (scores ≥4 out of 5) with positive statements about the microvideos and platform.

Scores range from 0-5, with higher scores indicating more positivity about the microvideos and platform, and lower scores indicating less positivity about the microvideos and platform.

up to 4 weeks
Satisfaction Acceptability of Microvideo Education
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks

Satisfaction will be summarized using means, standard deviations, and proportions of participants indicating strong agreement (scores ≥4 out of 5) with positive statements about the microvideos and platform.

Scores range from 0-5, with higher scores indicating more positivity about the microvideos and platform, and lower scores indicating less positivity about the microvideos and platform.

up to 4 weeks
HPV Vaccine Intention
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks

To assess HPV vaccine intention among unvaccinated emerging adult survivors of childhood cancer through a pilot quasi-experimental social media intervention.

This outcome measure will report the count of participants who intended to receive the HPV Vaccine after the microvideo education.

up to 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Echo Warner, MPH, PhD, SB, Huntsman Cancer Institute/ University of Utah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 198894

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HPV Vaccination

Clinical Trials on Microvideos: HPV Vaccination Education

Subscribe