3D Titanium Plates for Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture Fixation

June 11, 2026 updated by: Hala Omar Elmoursey, Cairo University

The Use of 3d Titanium Plates With Two Different Profile Thickness for Open Reduction and Rigid Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture:Randomised Clinical Trial

Mandibular fractures pose significant challenges in maxillofacial surgery due to their frequency, potential for functional impairment, and aesthetic concerns. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using titanium plates and screws have revolutionized the management of mandibular fractures.

The advent of 3D printing technology has ushered in a new era of patient-specific implants, offering improved adaptation to individual anatomy and potentially enhancing surgical outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The face is the window through which we perceive the world around us, and the world noted us. It serves a crucial role in human interaction and injuries to it result in devastating emotional sequelae. The human face constitutes the first contact point in several human interactions, thus injuries and/or mutilation of the facial structures may have a disastrous influence on the affected person.

The facial area is one of the most frequently injured parts of the body, and the mandible is one of the most commonly fractured maxillofacial bones. For the past decades, there has been a significant increase in maxillofacial traumas involving mandible. They are mainly caused by vehicular accidents, sport activities, penetrating injuries, physical assault, work-related accident, metabolic diseases or tumors.

The position, prominence, anatomic configuration, mobility and less bone support of the mandible make it one of the most frequent facial bones to be fractured. The mandibular fracture accounts for 36% to 54% of all fractures in the maxillofacial region. Mandible is the 10th most fractured bone in the whole body. They may occur alone or in combination with other facial bone fractures.

It plays a major role in mastication, speech, and deglutition. Its fractures result in severe loss of function and disfigurement. Fractures through the mandible at the level of the Symphysis and or parasymphysis are relatively common and account for approximately 20% of mandibular fractures. These fractures are often associated with a second fracture of the mandible, especially in the subcondylar region.

Fractures of the symphyseal region are often associated with the clinical findings of a widened intragonial distance with resultant malocclusion. Fractures of the anterior mandible lack two of the stabilizing factors provided to fractures of the posterior tooth-bearing mandible: the splinting effects of the masseter and internal pterygoid muscles, which form a natural sling, and the interlocking cusps and fossae of bicuspid and molar teeth.

Internal fixation in long bones has been adapted with particular modifications for the mandible. The disadvantage with these rigid plates was movement of the fracture fragment while tightening the screws resulting in malocclusion. Also, these plates could only be minimally adapted to the fracture fragments and produced more tension on the bone resulting in loosening of screws. They also require an extraoral approach and are highly technique sensitive.

The introduction of the 3-dimension (3D) system for the treatment of mandibular fractures has offered certain advantages over other plating systems. These plates function as internal fixator, achieving stability by 3D plates. A unique advantage of 3D system is that there is no need to adapt plate over the underlying bone, making plate adaptation easier.

Theoretical advantages proposed include close approximation, greater stability across the fracture site, less precision required in plate adaptation because of the internal/external fixator, less alteration in osseous or occlusal relationship upon screw tightening and, and less time required.

Although several materials can be used for manufacture of small plates, generally titanium is used because of its excellent biocompatibility, resistance to corrosion and pliability. Champy's miniplates require intra oral approach, less technique sensitive and produce consistently good results with regard to occlusion and also avoid the need for intermaxillary fixation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Giza Governorate
      • Cairo, Giza Governorate, Egypt
        • Dentistery Hospital, Cairo Universiy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ranging between 20-60 years.
  • Patients with mandibular parasymphyseal fractures requiring open reduction and fixation..
  • Patients with good health (ASA -I and ASA- II) without any contraindication for surgery or anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pre existing neurological or musculoskeletal disease.
  • Patients with infected fractures.
  • Patients with simultaneous condylar fracture.
  • Patients with regional malignancy.
  • Medically compromised patients.
  • Patients with blood diseases or severe renal disorders.
  • Patients refuse to share in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A (3d titanium plates of 2 mm):
About 9 patients suffered from Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture treated by using 3d titanium plates of 2 mm thickness.
to compare 3d titanium plates with two different profile thickness for open reduction and rigid fixation of mandibular parasymphyseal fracture.
Other Names:
  • Open Reduction and Rigid Internal Fixation
Active Comparator: Group B (3d titanium plates of 0.7 mm):
About 9 patients suffered from Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fracture treated by using 3d titanium plates of 0.7 mm thickness.
to compare 3d titanium plates with two different profile thickness for open reduction and rigid fixation of mandibular parasymphyseal fracture.
Other Names:
  • Open Reduction and Rigid Internal Fixation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment of Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 48 Hours from the operation
Treatment of the pain resulted from using 3d titanium plates with two different profile thickness for open reduction and fixation of mandibular Parasymphyseal fracture by using a standardized pain scale.
48 Hours from the operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of postoperative Complications
Time Frame: from1 week to 6 months
Secondary outcomes will be evaluated to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of using 3D titanium plates with different profile thicknesses in the fixation of mandibular body fractures (as infection, malocclusion, and hardwarerelated complications).
from1 week to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mohamed Atef, Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Kasr Al-Aini

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Mandibular Fracture

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures

Clinical Trials on 3D Titanium Plates

Subscribe