- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07221916
Stryker's Surgeon iD Mandible Reconstruction Plates: A Retrospective Post Market Follow Up (SMRP)
Stryker Customized Plates for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Post Market Follow Up to Confirm Safety and Performance of Surgeon iD Mandible Reconstruction Plates
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a retrospective non-interventional post-market follow up aiming at confirming safety and performance of Stryker's Surgeon iD Mandible Recon Plate when used in the clinical setting. This study will include patients who have previously undergone a surgical procedure involving the Study Device, with surgical outcomes evaluated retrospectively.
Based on a non-inferiority study power calculation a minimum of 27 patients will be enrolled in the study. Additional patients may be enrolled up to 80 subjects depending on site enrolment rate and patient availability. Up to 3 investigational sites within the United States and one in the EU will participate in this study. The primary outcome parameter evaluating successful reconstruction of the mandible without the need for unplanned revision surgery will be assessed at all available follow-up timepoints for included patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zwickau, Germany, 08060
- Heinrich-Braun-Klinikum gGmbH
-
-
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
- UCSF Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who underwent primary or secondary mandibular reconstruction using a Stryker Surgeon iD Plate implant as per routine clinical practice.
- Patients for whom data on the primary outcome variable is available.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with active local infections at the time of surgery.
- Patients with known metal allergies and/or foreign body sensitivity at the time of surgery.
- Potentially non-compliant patients who were unwilling or incapable of following post-operative care instructions.
- Patients with inadequate bone quantity or quality necessary for plate fixation or stabilization at the time of surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of successful reconstruction of the mandible without the need for unplanned revision surgery compared to benchmark devices in scientific literature.
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months
|
Rate of unplanned revision surgery determined by reviewing adverse events in patient medical charts after surgery.
Used to document whether an unplanned revision surgery was required or not for each patient.
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Infection rate
Time Frame: Data collected at time points from patient medical charts in the course of 12 months.
|
Determined by adverse events reported from patient medical charts.
|
Data collected at time points from patient medical charts in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Intraoperative complications
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Determined by adverse events reported from patient medical charts.
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Determined by adverse events reported from patient medical charts.
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Any known adverse events
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Determined by adverse events reported from patient medical charts.
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Rate of Plate failure
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Determined by adverse events reported from patient medical charts.
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Operating room (OR) time
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Time patients are operated (hh:mm)
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Time to return to solid food/normal diet
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Time for patient to return to solid food/normal diet post operation (dd)
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Rate of satisfactory occlusion achieved with orthodontic treatment.
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Assessed by review of individual patient medical records that document the rate of satisfactory occlusion achieved with orthodontic treatment.
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Hospitalization time: ICU and normal ward
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Time the patient was hospitalized post procedure (dd:hh)
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Short-form-12-health-survey-questionnaire (if available)
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Short-form-12-health-survey-Questionnaire (Scale of 0-100.
Scores above 50 indicate a better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below 50 suggest below-average health).
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Ischemia time
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Ischemia time (dd:hh)
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
EuroQol-5 Domain Questionnaire (if available)
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
A descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (VAS).
The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each with three to five levels of severity.
The VAS provides a subjective rating of overall health on a scale from 0 to 100 (higher is better)).
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Facial Appearance, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction Questionnaire (if available)
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
40 independently functioning scales and checklists.
Multiple independent scales, each with a 0-100 score, where higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Scores are calculated by summing responses on a 4-point Likert scale (e.g., strongly disagree to strongly agree), which are then converted to the 0-100 range.
Each scale measures a specific aspect of facial appearance, quality of life, or adverse effects and cannot be summed into a single total score.
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient age
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Age (years)
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Primary indication for the surgery / diagnosis
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Diagnosis collected from patient medical charts.
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Follow-up time
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Post operative follow up time for patients within standard of care.
Reported in patient medical charts during hospital follow up visit.
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Surgical approach
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 16 months.
|
Surgical approach taken for the procedure.
Including: transoral; transbuccal; submandibular; preauricular; other
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 16 months.
|
|
Rate of osteotomy
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Cases where osteotomy (e.g.
BSSO) was performed.
Instrumentation used to perform the osteotomy.
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Frequency of Maxilla-mandibular fixation
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Number of maxillo-mandibular fixation procedures (number per patient).
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Relevant Medical conditions
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Descriptive data of any underlying medical conditions and medications recorded in patient medical charts that may be related to the device or primary outcome (qualitative measure).
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Primary/secondary reconstruction performed
Time Frame: Data collected at time points point per patient in the course of 12 months
|
Type of reconstruction procedure performed (e.g.
immediately or after an initial surgery).
|
Data collected at time points point per patient in the course of 12 months
|
|
Localization of the defect
Time Frame: Data collected at time points point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Area to treated by the device: mandibular ramus; mandibular body; mandibular condyle; parasymphysis; paramedian; other
|
Data collected at time points point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Flap used
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Type of flap used: vascularized fibula flap, vascularized scapula flap, vascularized iliac crest flap, avascularized fibula flap, avascularized scapula flap, avascularized iliac crest flap, others
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Radiation
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Exposure of patient to radiation therapy within 12 months around the surgery date recorded in patient medical charts.
Radiation therapy performed on the anatomical area treated with the device.
Any postoperative radiation therapy recorded in patient medical charts.
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Dental reconstruction in a single stage surgery
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Data for dental reconstruction collected from patient medical charts.
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Sterilization method used
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Sterilization method used for the device.
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Fixation system used
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
System used to fix the device during the procedure.
Stryker Universal Mandible System; other Types and number of screws
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Plate types
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
2.0 or 2.8 plates used, hemi or full reconstruction plate used
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Gender
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months
|
Responses: Male, Female, undifferentiated, unknown
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months
|
|
Patient height
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Height (cm, feet, inches)
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Patient weight
Time Frame: Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Weight (kg, lb)
|
Data collected at a single time point per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Year smoking was stopped
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
Year smoking was stopped (YYYY)
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 months.
|
|
Smoking frequency
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 month
|
The frequency of exposure to smoking during periods of smoking (average number of cigarettes per day).
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 month
|
|
Smoking duration
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 month
|
Duration of smoking (pack years)
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 month
|
|
Years of active smoking
Time Frame: Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 month
|
Total number of years active smoker (YY)
|
Data collected at time points per patient in the course of 12 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
- Kakarala, Kiran, Yelizaveta Shnayder, Terance T. Tsue, and Douglas A. Girod. 2018. "Mandibular Recon-struction." Oral Oncology.
- Lee,Z. et. al.2020. "The Latest Evolution in Virtual Surgical Planning: Customized Reconstruction Plates in Free Fibula Flap Mandibular Reconstruction." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
- Witjes, Max J. H., Rutger H. Schepers, and Joep Kraeima. 2018. "Impact of 3D Virtual Planning on Recon-struction of Mandibular and Maxillary Surgical Defects in Head and Neck Oncology." Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery.
- Zeller AN, et al. Correction to: Patient-Specific Mandibular Reconstruction Plates Increase Accuracy and Long-Term Stability in Immediate Alloplastic Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Dec;21(4):1096.
- Möllmann HL, et al. Comparison of the Accuracy and Clinical Parameters of Patient-Specific and Conventionally Bended Plates for Mandibular Reconstruction. Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 26;11:719028.
- van Baar, et al, Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2018 Sep;84:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 20. PMID: 30115476.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Surgeon iD Plates _2023_01
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mandible Fracture
-
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing DocumentationAOCMFCompletedBilateral Condylar Fracture of the MandibleUnited States, Taiwan, Switzerland, South Africa, Finland, Slovenia, Pakistan, Spain, Germany, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Ukraine, Uruguay
-
Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustCompletedCondylar Process of Mandible Open FractureUnited Kingdom
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingTo Assess the Bone Healing in Fracture Mandible DefectsPakistan
-
Stryker CraniomaxillofacialCompletedMandible; Deformity | Mandible Fracture | Mandibular Fractures | MANDIBLE | Orthognathic Surgical ProceduresUnited States
-
Hennepin Healthcare Research InstituteUniversity of Minnesota; Regions HospitalCompletedSmoking | Inflammation | Surgery | Surgery--Complications | Wound Infection | Oxidative Stress | Wound | Mandible Fracture | Mandibular Fractures | Vitamin C Deficiency | Ascorbic Acid Deficiency | Wound Complication | Wound of Skin | Wound Dehiscence | Mandible Open Fracture | Mandible Closed FractureUnited States
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedMandible Fracture | Mandibular Fracture TraumaEgypt
-
Sohag UniversityActive, not recruitingMaxillofacial Injuries | Maxillofacial Trauma | Subcondylar Process of Mandible Closed Fracture | Orbital Floor (Blow-Out) Closed Fracture | Frontal Sinus FractureEgypt
-
Alexandria UniversityRecruitingMandible FractureEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownMandibular Fractures | Fracture MandibleEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Mandibular Reconstruction
-
Stryker CraniomaxillofacialCompletedMandible; Deformity | Mandible Fracture | Mandibular Fractures | MANDIBLE | Orthognathic Surgical ProceduresUnited States
-
UNICANCERCompletedOropharynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Oral Cavity Squamous Cell CarcinomaFrance
-
University of South WalesCompletedSurgery | Jaw Diseases | Mandibular Diseases | Jaw Cancer | Neoplasm, Oral | Osteoradionecrosis of JawUnited Kingdom
-
University of FloridaWithdrawnMaxillofacial Injuries
-
Mohamed Tahar Maamouri University HospitalCompletedMaxillofacial Injuries | Mandibular ReconstructionTunisia
-
Alexandria UniversityCompleted
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaRecruiting
-
Fayoum UniversityCompleted
-
University of Nove de JulhoCompletedMusculoskeletal DiseasesBrazil