- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07651241
Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Elective vs Emergency Cesarean Section
June 11, 2026 updated by: Abdelsalam Gomaa, Assiut University
Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Elective and Emergency Cesarean Section in Women's Health Hospital
Cesarean section (CS) rates have increased substantially worldwide and in Egypt, where they now account for the majority of deliveries.
Maternal and neonatal outcomes may differ between elective and emergency CS.
Emergency cesarean sections are generally associated with higher maternal morbidity, including increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, infection, blood transfusion, longer operative time, and prolonged hospital stay.
Neonatal outcomes following emergency CS may also be less favorable, with higher rates of low Apgar scores, respiratory distress, and NICU admission.
However, findings remain inconsistent across studies, highlighting the need for further prospective research to comprehensively compare maternal and fetal outcomes between elective and emergency cesarean deliveries.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
210
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Alwany Elsenousy Eldreemy Elkasse, professor
- Phone Number: +2001225005036
- Email: alwany.elsenousy@med.aun.edu.eg
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Mohamed Bahaa Mohamed Ahmed, lecturer
- Phone Number: +200 10 22422960
- Email: m.bahaa@med.aun.edu.eg
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Pregnant women undergoing cesarean section (elective or emergency) at Women's Health Hospital during the study period.
Eligible participants will include women with singleton pregnancies who meet the inclusion criteria and provide complete clinical data.
Maternal and neonatal outcomes will be assessed and compared between elective and emergency cesarean section groups.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1- Pregnant women undergoing cesarean section 2- Singleton pregnancy 3- Gestational age ≥ 28 weeks 4- Age 18-45 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1- Multiple pregnancy 2- Known fetal anomalies 3- Intrauterine fetal demise before cesarean section 4- Severe maternal comorbidities (e.g., cardiac disease, renal failure) 5- Rupture uterus 6- patients with placenta previa or accreta spectrum
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
• Maternal morbidity composite outcome • Neonatal morbidity composite outcome
Time Frame: From cesarean delivery until hospital discharge (up to 7 days postpartum).
|
From cesarean delivery until hospital discharge (up to 7 days postpartum).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Length of stay
Time Frame: From cesarean delivery until maternal hospital discharge (days), up to 7 days postpartum.
|
From cesarean delivery until maternal hospital discharge (days), up to 7 days postpartum.
|
|
Operative time
Time Frame: Assessed during cesarean section, from skin incision to skin closure (minutes).
|
Assessed during cesarean section, from skin incision to skin closure (minutes).
|
|
Infection rate
Time Frame: From cesarean delivery through 6 weeks postpartum.
|
From cesarean delivery through 6 weeks postpartum.
|
|
Effect of confounding factors on neonatal outcomes (gestational age at delivery, type of anaesthesia)
Time Frame: Assessed at birth and during neonatal hospitalization, up to 28 days after birth.
|
Assessed at birth and during neonatal hospitalization, up to 28 days after birth.
|
|
Effect of confounding factors on maternal outcomes (BMI)
Time Frame: BMI assessed at admission for delivery; association with maternal outcomes evaluated from cesarean delivery through hospital discharge (up to 7 days postpartum).
|
BMI assessed at admission for delivery; association with maternal outcomes evaluated from cesarean delivery through hospital discharge (up to 7 days postpartum).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gulmezoglu AM; WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. Epub 2015 Jul 22. No abstract available.
- Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, Wee M, Robinson PN. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med. 2000 Jul;93(7):346-50. doi: 10.1177/014107680009300703.
- Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, Moller AB, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, de Lyra Rabello Neto D, Temmerman M. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
- Khasawneh W, Obeidat N, Yusef D, Alsulaiman JW. The impact of cesarean section on neonatal outcomes at a university-based tertiary hospital in Jordan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03027-2.
- Souza JP, Gulmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B, Ruyan P; WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010 Nov 10;8:71. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-71.
- Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, Gibbons D, Kelly NM, Kennedy HP, Kidanto H, Taylor P, Temmerman M. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
- Doke PP, Vaidya VM, Narula APS, Patil AV, Panchanadikar TM, Wagh GN, Iyengar KS. Relative risk of postpartum maternal morbidity among cesarean-delivered women: A multisite prospective cohort study in a large district, India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Dec;11(12):7705-7712. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1292_22. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
- Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Hassanin AI, Ibraheem AA. Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Nov;123(2):119-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 11, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
June 16, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 16, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 11, 2026
Last Verified
June 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- MF_CS_2026
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Elective vs Emergency Cesarean Section
-
Sheba Medical CenterTerminatedElective Cesarean Section | Maternal Hypotention
-
National University of MalaysiaCompletedPregnancy Related | Cesarean Section Complications | Hypotension | Maternal-Fetal RelationsMalaysia
-
Sohag UniversityCompletedPain Management in Adult Females in Child Bearing Period Aging From 20 to 45 Years Who Are Scheduled for Elective Cesarean SectionEgypt
-
Rajavithi HospitalCompletedTo Compare Efficacy Intrauterine vs Sublingual MISOPROSTOL in Addition to Oxytocin in Reducing Blood Loss of Post-cesarean Section in High Risk WomenThailand
Clinical Trials on emergency cesarean section
-
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and...CompletedPain | Hemorrhage | Ileus | Postpartum FeverTurkey
-
Ain Shams UniversityUnknownNatural Cesarean Section
-
Saint Thomas Hospital, PanamaCompleted
-
Bilge HospitalCompletedCesarean Section ComplicationsTurkey
-
Universidade do Vale do SapucaiCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedPrevious Cesarean Section ScarEgypt
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Earlier Family Bond Initiation | Maternal and Neonatal OutcomesUnited States
-
University of NebraskaWithdrawnCesarean Section
-
Beni-Suef UniversityActive, not recruitingCesarean Section | DehiscenceEgypt