The Effect of HPI to Reduce Intraoperative Hypotension in Caesarean Sections

May 20, 2025 updated by: National University of Malaysia

The Effect Of Using Hypotension Prediction Index To Reduce Intraoperative Hypotension In Caesarean Sections: A Randomised Controlled Trial

During caesarean section, blood pressure variations especially a reduction in blood pressure (or hypotension) can bring harmful effects to mother and baby. This usually occurs after spinal anaesthesia is administered. Usually, the anaesthetist will treat hypotension as it occurs. However, a new medical device is now available to predict hypotension. It is called the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI). This device allows the prediction of hypotension; hence, treatment can be given before it occurs. It has been widely utilised in major surgeries like abdominal tumour surgery and cardiac surgery worldwide and has shown a substantial reduction in hypotension. This study aims to determine whether the duration and severity of hypotension can be reduced when HPI is used in lower segment caesarean sections. The secondary objective of the study is to determine if the complication rate can be reduced in both mother and baby.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) has been shown to reduce IOH significantly in non-cardiac and major abdominal surgeries.The role of HPI beyond reducing IOH has also been a subject of research. Andrzejeska et al. demonstrated that the use of HPI in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery leads to lower reductions in post-surgery haemoglobin levels, shorter duration of hypotension and shorter hospital admissions. Additionally, the intervention group had shorter timeframes from the end of surgery to extubation.

The development of a non-invasive finger blood pressure device compatible with HPI called the Acumen IQ cuff, made it possible to use HPI without inserting an arterial catheter. The arterial pressure waveform generated by a non-invasive finger cuff was reliable and in agreement with the radial artery blood pressure. A retrospective analysis was conducted by Frassanito et al. to determine the performance of HPI using arterial waveform recorded by a non-invasive finger probe to predict hypotension in patients undergoing CS under spinal anaesthesia. They have found that HPI, using this non-invasive probe, was able to predict hypotension with a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 83% at 3 minutes, 97% and 97% at 2 minutes, and 100% and 100% at 1 minute, before it occurs.

This study aims to determine if the solution to reduce IOH lies in predicting intraoperative hypotension during lower segment ceaserean section (CS). The benefits of HPI may extend beyond reducing the incidence and severity of IOH, to bringing positive outcomes to the foetus. This study will determine whether integrating an early warning system produces benefits significant enough to justify changing our anaesthetic practice.

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Varying methods have been utilised to reduce IOH in CS. A novel software, HPI, was developed to predict hypotension, enabling clinicians to institute guided treatment before maternal hypotension occurs. The investigator need to determine if HPI has benefits in CS, thus leading to better maternal and neonatal outcomes.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can HPI using the non-invasive continuous arterial pressure waveforms reduce the duration and severity of hypotension in patients undergoing CS under spinal anaesthesia?

OBJECTIVES

Study objective:

To determine if HPI has benefits in CS, thus leading to better maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to oNIBP.

Primary outcome:

The duration and severity of hypotensive events reported as a time-weighted average (TWA) - MAP < 65 mmHg in HPI group (intervention) versus standard oNIBP.

Secondary outcomes:

  1. To determine whether the use of HPI leads to better maternal outcomes (incidence of nausea and vomiting, blood loss, length of hospital stay, maternal satisfaction, incidence of surgical site infection)
  2. To determine whether the use of HPI leads to better foetal outcomes (Apgar scores, umbilical cord pH, length of hospital stay)
  3. To determine the amount of vasopressors and inotropes administered throughout CS if HPI is used versus conventional oNIBP monitoring

RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS

Additional parameters from HPI in the CS under spinal anaesthesia will reduce the duration and severity of intraoperative hypotension and provide better maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
      • Cheras, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 56000
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • ≥ 37 weeks of gestation
  • Elective CS
  • Age between 18 - 40 years old
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Planned for spinal anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III and above
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2
  • Increased risk of developing peripartum haemorrhage
  • History of peripartum haemorrhage
  • Placenta previa major, accrete, increta, percreta
  • Gravida ≥ 5
  • Presence of large uterine fibroids
  • Congenital bleeding disorders such as Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B and Von Willebrand disease
  • Acquired bleeding disorders such as thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy
  • Contraindications to finger cuff orNIBP application, such as finger ischaemia, upper limb neurological deficit, discoloured nail
  • Cardiac arrhythmias and aortic regurgitation
  • Patient's refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1: HPI Group
There were 2 arm group, in Group 1the Acumen IQ cuff, with HPI and other haemodynamics parameters, is available to the anaesthetist to view and act upon.
HPI and other haemodynamics parameters, is available to the anaesthetist to view and act upon
Other Names:
  • HPI
Placebo Comparator: Group 2: NIBP Group
the attending anaesthetist will be blinded from the HPI parameters.
Anaesthetist will respond to hemodynamic variables using NIBP
Other Names:
  • NIBP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time-weighted average of Mean arterial pressure <65mmHg
Time Frame: From spinal anaesthesia to completion of surgery
Calculated using a formula. TWA-MAP < 65 mmHg = (the depth of hypotension< MAP of 65 mmHg x time spent below a MAP of 65 mmHg (minutes))/(total duration of operation (minutes))
From spinal anaesthesia to completion of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of nausea and vomiting,
Time Frame: Perioperative up to 2 days
Maternal incidence of nausea and vomiting
Perioperative up to 2 days
length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Perioperative up to 2 weeks
maternal length of hospital stay
Perioperative up to 2 weeks
incidence of surgical site infection
Time Frame: Perioperative up to 2 weeks
maternal surgical site infection
Perioperative up to 2 weeks
maternal satisfaction
Time Frame: Perioperative up to 2 weeks
Likert scale from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied)
Perioperative up to 2 weeks
Umbilical cord PH
Time Frame: Immediately upon delivery of baby
Umbilical cord PH taken after after delivery of baby
Immediately upon delivery of baby
Neonatal length of stay
Time Frame: Perioperative up to 2 weeks
Neonatal length of stay
Perioperative up to 2 weeks
Apgar score of feotal
Time Frame: 1 minute and 5 minutes after delivery
Apgar scores of 0-10 ( Apgar score of 7 and more is considered normal)
1 minute and 5 minutes after delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Azlina Masdar, National University of Malaysia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • JEP-2024-463

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data of the study will be available in public data repository

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After completion of the study and analysis for 5 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

With permission from corresponding author

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy Related

Clinical Trials on Hypotension prediction index

Subscribe