SPSIP Versus RISS Block in Volume-Preserving VATS (SRVATS)

June 12, 2026 updated by: Ferit Yetik

Comparison of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block and Rhomboid Intercostal-Subserratus Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Respiratory Functions in Volume-Preserving Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

This prospective randomized controlled study aims to compare the effects of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block and Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus (RISS) block on postoperative pain, respiratory function, and recovery quality in patients undergoing volume-preserving video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Eighty-four patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SPSIP block or RISS block. The primary outcome is the incidence of somatic pain at the chest drain insertion site at postoperative 2 hours. Secondary outcomes include pain scores, opioid consumption, quality of recovery, diaphragmatic function, pulmonary function, rescue analgesic requirements, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and block-related complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is associated with significant postoperative pain that may impair respiratory function and delay recovery. Regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly used to improve analgesia while minimizing opioid-related adverse effects.

The Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block and the Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus (RISS) block are novel ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks that provide thoracic analgesia through different mechanisms. However, comparative clinical evidence regarding their efficacy in VATS patients remains limited.

This prospective, randomized, controlled study will enroll 84 adult patients scheduled for volume-preserving VATS. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either SPSIP block or RISS block in a 1:1 ratio (42 patients per group).

The primary endpoint is the incidence of somatic pain at the chest drain insertion site at postoperative 2 hours.

Secondary endpoints include postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement, total intravenous morphine consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at postoperative 24 hours, diaphragmatic excursion measured by ultrasonography, peak expiratory flow measurements, rescue analgesic requirements, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and block-related complications.

The study has been approved by the Bursa Sehir Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice principles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Nilüfer
      • Bursa, Nilüfer, Turkey (Türkiye), 16100
        • Bursa City Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yusuf Alan, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Onur Gunes, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Halil ERTEK, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for elective biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with lung parenchyma-preserving thoracic procedures under general anesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Age between 18 and 75 years
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy
  • Bleeding diathesis
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Infection at the planned block site
  • Severe chronic pulmonary disease or advanced respiratory failure (e.g., severe COPD or restrictive lung disease)
  • Cognitive impairment preventing reliable NRS assessment
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Chronic opioid use (regular use for ≥3 months)
  • Severe hepatic or renal failure
  • Refusal to participate
  • Technical failure or unsuccessful regional block
  • Conversion to open thoracotomy during surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SPSIP Block Group
Patients will receive an ultrasound-guided Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block before induction of general anesthesia for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).
Ultrasound-guided Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block performed before induction of general anesthesia using local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Experimental: RISS Block Group
Patients will receive an ultrasound-guided Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus (RISS) block before induction of general anesthesia for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).
Ultrasound-guided Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus (RISS) block performed before induction of general anesthesia using local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Somatic Pain at Chest Tube Insertion Site
Time Frame: Postoperative 2 hours
Incidence of somatic pain localized at the chest tube insertion site, defined as sharp localized pain aggravated by coughing or deep inspiration, recorded as present or absent.
Postoperative 2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Scores at Rest
Time Frame: Postoperative 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours
Static postoperative pain scores assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at rest.
Postoperative 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours
Postoperative Pain Scores During Movement
Time Frame: Postoperative 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours
Dynamic postoperative pain scores assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) during movement.
Postoperative 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours
Total Intravenous Morphine Consumption
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours
Total intravenous morphine consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery.
Postoperative 24 hours
Interval Intravenous Morphine Consumption
Time Frame: Postoperative 0-8, 8-16, and 16-24 hours
Intravenous morphine consumption recorded separately for postoperative 0-8, 8-16, and 16-24 hour intervals.
Postoperative 0-8, 8-16, and 16-24 hours
Right Hemidiaphragm Excursion
Time Frame: Preoperative and postoperative 6 hours
Right hemidiaphragm excursion measured by ultrasonography to evaluate diaphragmatic function.
Preoperative and postoperative 6 hours
Peak Expiratory Flow
Time Frame: Preoperative and postoperative 6 hours
Peak expiratory flow measured using a peak flowmeter to evaluate respiratory performance.
Preoperative and postoperative 6 hours
Quality of Recovery-15 Score
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours
Postoperative recovery quality assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire.
Postoperative 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) sharing has not yet been determined. The decision regarding data sharing will be made after study completion and in accordance with institutional policies, ethical considerations, and participant confidentiality requirements.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block

Subscribe