Digital Monitoring of Upper Limb Function in Non-Ambulant DMD (Acti-nRoll)

June 18, 2026 updated by: Laurent Servais, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege

Feasibility, Reliability, Clinical Validity and Sensitivity of Digital Outcomes to Monitor Upper Limb Function in Non-ambulant Patients With Genetically Confirmed Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a rare genetic disorder caused by the absence of dystrophin, leading to progressive muscle degeneration. Symptoms typically begin in early childhood and result in loss of ambulation by early adolescence, followed by cardiorespiratory complications. Although early treatment, including corticosteroids and emerging therapies, can slow disease progression, sensitive tools to monitor functional decline-particularly in non-ambulant patients-remain limited.

Current assessments rely primarily on clinical scales and hospital-based evaluations, which may not detect subtle changes or reflect real-life function. Digital outcome measures derived from wearable sensors offer a promising approach for continuous, objective monitoring in daily life. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, reliability, clinical validity, and sensitivity of digital measures to assess upper limb function in non-ambulant patients with genetically confirmed DMD. The Syde device, previously validated in ambulant DMD patients, will be investigated for its applicability in this population.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Liège, Belgium, 4000
        • Centre de référence des maladies neuromusculaire, Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with genetically confirmed Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD).
  • Non-ambulant at the time of inclusion (not able to walk 10m without external aid).
  • A legal guardian willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study if < 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any acute or chronic condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may significantly interfere with the assessments and/or motor function progression.
  • Participation in an interventional clinical trial.
  • No access to internet connection or alternatively no capacity to come on-site to bring the Syde every 6 months after the recording periods for data retrieval by Liège team
  • Scoliosis surgery within the previous 6 months or planned within the next year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-ambulant participants with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)
Syde is an innovative device intended to be used in a home-based environment. It is composed of two watch-like sensors, each containing a magneto-inertial sensors that record the linear acceleration, the angular velocity, the magnetic field of the movement in all directions.The two watches can be worn as wristwatch or placed near the ankle.
Dynamometric measurements of the maximum force of the following functions will be taken with the MyoTools: palmar grip (MyoGrip) and thumb-index pinch (MyoPinch). Test will be realized on the dominant side. Patients will be encouraged during the test. They will be given three trials and the best score will be entered.
This test consists of a set of small manoeuvres (lifting a box, writing, etc.) designed to evaluate the upper-limb functionality of non-ambulatory patients. It was developed specifically for use in cases of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
The Brooke Upper Extremity Functional Rating Scale will be used to assess the global functional level of upper limb involvement. This 6-point ordinal scale classifies patients according to their highest achievable upper limb function, from full arm abduction to absence of useful hand function.
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) will be assessed using standardized spirometry procedures. The primary parameter will be FVC expressed as percentage of predicted values. At least three acceptable and reproducible maneuvers will be performed according to standard guidelines.
The CGI-S is a clinician-rated scale used at baseline to assess the overall severity of the participant's condition, based on all available clinical information. The rating reflects the clinician's judgment without standardized scoring rules and must be performed by a clinician experienced in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. The CGI-S evaluates three domains: physical motor function, respiratory function, and bulbar function. It is completed after all other study assessments (excluding patient-reported outcomes) to ensure a comprehensive evaluation.
The CGI-C is used at each follow-up visit to assess changes in the participant's condition relative to baseline. It provides a clinician-determined measure of improvement or worsening, based on overall clinical judgment rather than fixed criteria. Like the CGI-S, it covers physical motor, respiratory, and bulbar domains and is performed after all other study assessments (excluding patient-reported outcomes). The CGI-C is expected to track consistently with prior CGI-S evaluations, reflecting changes in disease status over time.
The PGI-S (Patient Global Impression of Severity) is a simple, validated, single-item self-administered scale used to assess the current severity of a patient's condition. Widely used in clinical trials, it allows patients to rate their condition, on a 4- to 6-point scale (from 'Normal' to 'Very severe').

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device usage (recording time)
Time Frame: Recording periods at Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Total recording time per recording period (hours)
Recording periods at Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Patient compliance (Min)
Time Frame: Recording periods at Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Percentage of participants achieving minimal threshold (expected 50h) of recording time per period
Recording periods at Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Patient compliance (Max)
Time Frame: Recording periods at Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Percentage of participants achieving optimal threshold (expected 180h) of recording time per period
Recording periods at Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reliability
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for two distinct consecutive half-periods
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Clinical validity of digital outcome vs Brooke
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Correlation between digital outcome and Brooke Upper Extremity Rating Scale (Brooke score)
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Clinical validity of digital outcome vs PUL
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Correlation between digital outcome and Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) score
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Sensitivity of Digital Upper Limb Outcome Measures
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Sensitivity will be evaluated by assessing the ability of digital outcome measures to detect change over time combining mean change from baseline, slope of change over time, and standardized response mean (SRM).
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurent Servais, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

Clinical Trials on Syde

3
Subscribe