Carrot Technique Versus Guided Bone Regeneration for Horizontal Ridge Deficiency in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone

June 25, 2026 updated by: Sarah Elmaghraby, Mansoura University

Evaluation of the Carrot Technique With Simultaneous Implant Placement for Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Deficiency in the Maxillary Aesthetic Zone: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of the Carrot Technique and Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) for the management of horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency in patients requiring implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone. Twenty patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups. Clinical outcomes including implant stability and soft tissue healing, as well as radiographic outcomes including alveolar ridge width, bone density, and marginal bone loss, will be evaluated using clinical examinations and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) during a 12-month follow-up period..

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Carrot Technique is a minimally invasive approach that utilizes an autogenous bone core harvested during implant osteotomy and repositioned to augment the deficient buccal ridge. This technique may reduce donor-site morbidity while providing sufficient horizontal bone augmentation. Guided Bone Regeneration remains one of the most widely used techniques for horizontal ridge reconstruction through the use of bone substitute materials and barrier membranes.

This randomized controlled clinical trial will compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Carrot Technique and GBR in patients presenting with horizontal ridge deficiency in the maxillary esthetic zone. Twenty patients requiring single-tooth implant rehabilitation will be randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group I will receive implant placement combined with the Carrot Technique, while Group II will receive implant placement combined with Guided Bone Regeneration.

Clinical evaluations will include implant stability assessed by resonance frequency analysis, soft tissue healing using the Landry Healing Index, and peri-implant inflammation using the modified sulcus bleeding index. Radiographic evaluation will be performed using cone beam computed tomography immediately after surgery and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively to assess changes in alveolar ridge width, bone density, and marginal bone loss. The study aims to determine whether the Carrot Technique provides comparable or superior outcomes to GBR for horizontal ridge augmentation associated with implant placement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Al Mansurah, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
    • Dakahlia Governorate
      • Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt, 35511
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 to 45 years. Missing a single tooth in the maxillary esthetic zone requiring implant placement.

Good oral hygiene and patient compliance. Medically free from systemic diseases that contraindicate implant surgery. Slight to moderate horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency with a minimum ridge width of 5 mm.

Adequate vertical bone height for implant placement. Medium to hard bone quality (D2-D3 according to Misch classification). Absence of bruxism or other parafunctional habits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of local pathological lesions (e.g., cysts or tumors) at the planned surgical site.

Poor bone quality (D4 bone). Pregnancy. Heavy smoking. Any medical condition contraindicating implant surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Carrot Technique
Implant placement with horizontal ridge augmentation using an autogenous bone core harvested with a trephine drill from the implant osteotomy site and fixed buccally using osteosynthesis screws.
Implant placement with simultaneous horizontal ridge augmentation using an autogenous bone core harvested from the implant osteotomy site with a trephine drill and fixed buccally using osteosynthesis screws.
Active Comparator: Guided Bone Regeneration
Implant placement with horizontal ridge augmentation using bone substitute material and a collagen membrane according to guided bone regeneration principles.
Implant placement with simultaneous horizontal ridge augmentation using bone substitute material and a collagen membrane according to guided bone regeneration principles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Alveolar Ridge Width
Time Frame: baseline and 12 Months
Horizontal alveolar ridge width measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Changes in ridge width will be calculated by comparing measurements obtained immediately after surgery and at follow-up.
baseline and 12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marginal Bone Loss
Time Frame: 12 Months
Marginal bone loss measured radiographically using CBCT using the implant as a reference.
12 Months
Soft Tissue Healing
Time Frame: 1 Week, 2 Weeks, and 1 Month
Soft tissue healing assessed using the Landry Healing Index.
1 Week, 2 Weeks, and 1 Month
Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index
Time Frame: 1 Month and 12 Months
Peri-implant soft tissue inflammation assessed using the Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI).
1 Month and 12 Months
Bone Density
Time Frame: 12 Months
Buccal peri-implant bone density measured using CBCT and expressed in Hounsfield Units.
12 Months
Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ)
Time Frame: At implant placement and 12 months
Implant stability assessed using resonance frequency analysis and expressed as Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ).
At implant placement and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sarah A Elmaghraby, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Partial Edentulism

Clinical Trials on Carrot Technique

3
Subscribe