Standard Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath in Pediatric Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Renal Stones < 2 cm (FANS-UAS)

July 6, 2026 updated by: Khaled Mostafa Saed Elmaradny, Tanta University

Standard Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath in Pediatric Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Renal Stones < 2 cm : A Randomized Controlled Study

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus a standard ureteral access sheath during flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) in pediatric patients with renal stones less than 2 cm. The study will evaluate stone-free rates. operative time. intraoperative parameters. operative and postoperative complication and the need for any auxiliary procedures. Sixty pediatric patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups and treated at the Urology Department, Tanta University.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pediatric urolithiasis is an increasingly recognized condition associated with substantial morbidity and recurrence risk. Flexible ureterorenoscopy has become an established minimally invasive treatment option for renal stones smaller than 2 cm. The use of ureteral access sheaths facilitates repeated upper urinary tract access and may improve operative efficiency; however, concerns regarding ureteral trauma remain.

Recently developed suction-assisted ureteral access sheaths have been introduced to improve visibility, facilitate fragment evacuation, and reduce intrarenal pressure. Although promising results have been reported in adults, evidence in pediatric patients remains limited.

This prospective randomized controlled trial will compare a standard ureteral access sheath with a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) in pediatric patients undergoing flexible ureterorenoscopy for renal stones less than 2 cm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Gharbia Governorate
      • Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt, 31527

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years)
  2. Patients with renal stones less than 2 cm
  3. Indicated for flexible ureterorenoscopy
  4. Fit for general anesthesia
  5. Informed consent obtained from parents or guardians

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Stones larger than 2 cm
  2. Active urinary tract infection
  3. Congenital urinary tract anomalies affecting access
  4. Previous ureteral surgery affecting the ureter
  5. Coagulopathy or unfit for surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A: Standard UAS
Standard UAS (Length: 28-35 cm, Size: 10/12 Fr or 9.5/11.5 Fr) used during flexible ureteroscopic stone fragmentation using Holmium:YAG laser.
Standard UAS (Length: 28-35 cm, Size: 10/12 Fr or 9.5/11.5 Fr)
Experimental: Group B: Suction UAS (FAAN)
Suction evacuation ureteral access sheath (Length: 30-35 cm, Size: 10/12 Fr or 11/13 Fr) with terminal flexible end enabling continuous drainage and suction during laser stone fragmentation
Suction evacuation ureteral access sheath (Length: 30-35 cm, Size: 10/12 Fr or 11/13 Fr) with terminal flexible end

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stone-free rate (SFR)
Time Frame: 1 month postoperatively
Absence of residual fragments or presence of clinically insignificant residual fragments measuring < 3 mm, assessed by postoperative CT scan.
1 month postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative complications
Time Frame: intraoperatively
intraoperatively
Operative time
Time Frame: Intraoperatively . from insertion of sheath
Intraoperatively . from insertion of sheath
Intraoperative visibility and ease of access
Time Frame: intraoperatively
Intraoperative visibility and ease of access using scale (good-moderate-poor)
intraoperatively
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: up to 30 days postoperatively
Postoperative complications (according to Clavien-Dindo classification).
up to 30 days postoperatively
Need for auxiliary procedures.
Time Frame: up to 30 days postoperatively
This outcome measure will evaluate the requirement for additional interventions to achieve complete stone clearance or manage residual fragments. It will be assessed by recording the percentage of participants who require any secondary or ancillary surgical procedures (such as second-stage ureterorenoscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, or temporary stenting) within 30 days postoperatively
up to 30 days postoperatively
Length of hospital stay.
Time Frame: From the day of surgery up to hospital discharge (estimated average of 3 days)
The duration of hospitalization will be calculated in days, from the date of the participant's admission/surgery until the actual date of discharge from the hospital
From the day of surgery up to hospital discharge (estimated average of 3 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: salah abdelmnsef nagla, MD-PHD, Tanta unversity
  • Study Director: osama mostafa elgamal, MD-PHD, Tanta unversity
  • Study Director: Mohamed ebrahim elmaadawy, MD-PHD, Tanta unversity

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nephrolithiasis

Clinical Trials on Standard Ureteral Access Sheath (Boston Scientific).

3
Subscribe