Effect of Chronotype on Balance and Cognitive Function

July 8, 2026 updated by: Yasin Yildirim, Istanbul Gedik University

Examining the Relationship Between Balance and Cognitive Functions Based on Chronotype

Balance is the ability of an individual to maintain posture against gravity and sustain stability during movement; it depends on the coordinated functioning of the proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular systems, as well as the central nervous system. Current studies show that movement control occurs not only through the motor system but also through the interaction of sensory-cognitive-motor components. Cognitive functions encompass processes such as attention, memory, visuospatial skills, and executive functions, with attention and visuospatial processing playing a particularly important role in balance control. The literature reports significant relationships between balance and cognitive functions, particularly noting that increased attention requirements in dual-tasking situations negatively impact balance performance. Furthermore, it has been shown that both balance performance and cognitive functions are affected by circadian rhythm and chronotype, with individuals exhibiting different performance levels at different times of the day. Despite this, studies examining the relationship between balance and cognitive functions appear to have insufficiently addressed the chronotype factor. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate how the relationship between balance and cognitive functions changes according to individuals' chronotypes.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healty young people

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being between 18-35 years old
  • Not using any neuropsychiatric medication
  • Not having undergone lower extremity surgery
  • Having at least a bachelor's degree

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of a neurological disease
  • A history of a neuropsychiatric disease
  • Individuals with an intermediate type according to the Horne-Ostberg questionnaire results

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Early type
Late type

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chronotype
Time Frame: baseline - 2 weeks later
It will be assessed by survey (Horne Ostberg). The survey contains a total of 19 questions. Points will be added up based on participants' answers to obtain a score between 16 and 86. 16-30 will be considered evening type, and 70-86 will be considered morning type.
baseline - 2 weeks later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
balance
Time Frame: baseline - 2 weeks later
It will be assessed with KoreBalance balance system. Users will be asked to keep their eyes open while maintaining a center of gravity on an electronic device. Results are presented as point scores.
baseline - 2 weeks later
Attention measurement
Time Frame: baseline - 2 weeks later
It will be assessed with stroop test. Individuals will be tested at a desk. They will first be asked to read only the text written in three different colors. Then they will be asked to read the colors of the text. The total score will be recorded in milliseconds.
baseline - 2 weeks later
Visuo-spatial attention
Time Frame: baseline - 2 weeks later
It will be assessed with Flanker task. Eriksen Flanker Task is a classic cognitive psychology test that measures selective attention and response inhibition. You are asked to identify the direction of a central target (e.g., an arrow) while ignoring distracting "flanker" arrows on either side, which can either point the same way (congruent) or opposite (incongruent). The total correct responses are kept.
baseline - 2 weeks later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 26, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E-10840098-202.3.02-3738

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healhty

3
Subscribe