Impact of EEG-guided Sevofluorane on Opioid Consumption and Quality of Awakening

Impact of EEG-guided Sevoflurane Titration on Opioid Consumption and Emergency Quality in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Surgery Without Regional Anesthesia

This prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm parallel-group clinical trial evaluates whether EEG-guided sevoflurane titration affects intraoperative opioid consumption and emergence quality in children undergoing painful elective surgery without regional anesthesia. Children aged 2-8 years (ASA I-II) scheduled for elective tonsillectomy (±adenoidectomy) are randomized 1:1 to a Control Group (standard 1 age-adjusted MAC; EEG screen concealed) or a Study Group (sevoflurane titrated to a stable slow-delta/alpha EEG pattern, SEF 17-20 Hz, starting at ~0.7 MAC). In both arms, fentanyl (0.5-1 mcg/kg IV) is added when nociception signs occur. The primary outcome is intraoperative fentanyl consumption (mean mcg/kg rate). Secondary outcomes include sevoflurane exposure (EtSevo, MAC-hours), EEG burst suppression, emergence time, emergence delirium (PAED scale), postoperative pain and opioid use, and hemodynamic events. Sample size: 50 participants (25/arm; 90% power, α=0.05, expected difference 2 mcg/kg, SD=2). EEG spectral analysis is performed in MATLAB using multitaper frequency-domain bootstrap. The study has institutional ethics approval; parental consent and patient assent (≥7 years) are obtained prior to enrollment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Electroencephalography (EEG)-guided anesthetic titration has demonstrated significant clinical benefits in both pediatric and adult patients. However, proprietary EEG-based indices widely used for monitoring anesthetic depth are affected by patient age and the specific anesthetic agent used, limiting their validity and generalizability. More recently, titrating anesthetics based on a specific interpretation of EEG waveforms and their oscillatory patterns observed on the spectrogram has gained popularity.

Previous studies indicate that sevoflurane titration based on specific EEG waveforms and oscillatory patterns yields more substantial reductions in sevoflurane exposure than previously reported with proprietary EEG indices. Furthermore, reducing sevoflurane exposure decreases the incidence of EEG burst suppression, results in faster emergence times, and reduces emergence delirium.

However, most of these benefits have been reported in the context of surgeries where intraoperative antinociception was provided via central or peripheral nerve blocks, in the absence of increased intraoperative analgesic and opioid requirements. It remains unclear whether the benefits associated with reduced sevoflurane exposure are also observed in surgeries where intraoperative antinociception cannot be provided through regional blocks. In such cases, antinociception depends primarily on the co-administration of inhaled anesthetics and opioids. Therefore, the clinical benefits of decreasing sevoflurane exposure via electroencephalographic guidance must be weighed against the side effects of higher perioperative opioid requirements.

What will be the impact of strict titration of the hypnotic component using electroencephalography in a painful surgery, in terms of intraoperative opioid consumption and the quality of anesthetic emergence? It is hypothesized that to adjust the sevoflurane dose according to EEG targets in children undergoing surgeries where intraoperative antinociception cannot be provided via regional blocks will result in a reduction of sevoflurane requirements. However, a compensatory increase in intraoperative opioid consumption is expected to be observed, which could subsequently affect the quality and duration of the anesthetic recovery period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Santiago, Chile
        • Hospital UC Christus
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 2-8 years
  • ASA Physical Status I or II
  • Elective tonsillectomy (±adenoidectomy)
  • Signed parental consent (and assent ≥7 years)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • Growth or developmental delay
  • Known allergy to study medications
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Parental or patient refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
Induction with sevoflurane 5% in O₂. Maintenance at fixed 1 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%. BIS monitor attached but screen concealed; anesthesiologist blinded to EEG data.
Arm Description: Induction with sevoflurane 5% in O₂. Maintenance at fixed 1 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%. BIS monitor attached but screen concealed; anesthesiologist blinded to EEG data.
Experimental: Intervention Group
Induction with sevoflurane 3% in O₂. Maintenance titrated to the minimum concentration sustaining a continuous slow-delta/alpha EEG pattern (SEF 17-20 Hz), starting at 0.7 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%.
Induction with sevoflurane 3% in O₂. Maintenance titrated to the minimum concentration sustaining a continuous slow-delta/alpha EEG pattern (SEF 17-20 Hz), starting at 0.7 age-adjusted MAC in O₂/air FiO₂ 60%.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total intraoperative opioid consumption
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
Mean fentanyl rate (mcg/kg).
Intraoperative period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sevoflurane exposure
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
Age-adjusted MAC-hours
Intraoperative period
Sevoflurane exposure
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
EtSevo
Intraoperative period
EEG burst suppression
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
incidence
Intraoperative period
EEG spectral markers_TBP
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
Total band power
Intraoperative period
EEG spectral markers_MedF
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
Median frequency
Intraoperative period
EEG spectral markers_SEF95
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
SEF 95%
Intraoperative period
EEG burst suppression
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
Cumulative duration
Intraoperative period
hemodynamic, Bradicardia
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
Intraoperative bradycardia (HR<20% basaline) requiring intervention
Intraoperative period
hemodynamic, hypotension
Time Frame: Intraoperative period
intraoperative hypotension (MAP<20% basaline) requiring intervention
Intraoperative period
emergence time
Time Frame: From end of anesthesia period to extubation
Time from anesthesia discontinuation to extubation
From end of anesthesia period to extubation
Eye opening, emergence time
Time Frame: From end of anesthesia period to extubation
Time from anesthesia discontinuation to eye opening
From end of anesthesia period to extubation
emergence delirium
Time Frame: Post anesthesia period
incidence by paed scale
Post anesthesia period
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: Post anesthesia period
flacc/vas scores
Post anesthesia period
Rescue analgesia
Time Frame: Post anesthesia period
Drug use for rescue analgesia non opioids (mg)
Post anesthesia period
postoperative opioid use
Time Frame: Post anesthesia period
fentanyl use for pain rescue (mcg)
Post anesthesia period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Victor Contreras, MSN, RN, Researcher
  • Principal Investigator: Mauricio Ibacache, Phd, Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan Informed Consent Form Clinical Study Report

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Standard

3
Subscribe