- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07764315
EEG-Based Decision-Support Algorithm for Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy in Term Newborns (COOLDECIDE)
August 11, 2026 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Retrospective Multicenter Validation of a Conventional EEG-Based Decision-Support Algorithm to Discriminate Mild Versus Moderate/Severe Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy in Term Newborns (Newborn Neuro Digital Project)
This retrospective, multicenter, observational study evaluates how well a decision-support algorithm can tell apart mild forms of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) from moderate or severe forms in full-term newborns born after a lack of oxygen around birth (perinatal asphyxia).
The algorithm reads the raw (non-compressed) EEG signal.
Its output is compared with the reference reading of the full conventional EEG made by a panel of pediatric neurophysiologists together with the baby's clinical information.
The study uses only medical data that already exists and asks nothing of the babies or their families.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Detailed Description
The algorithm under investigation was developed in a previous retrospective clinical study (registered as NCT05114070; French CNIL/ethics ref CER-2021-023; approved by the Sorbonne University ethics committee) and is based on background-rhythm analysis of EEG.
Newborns are analyzed in two subgroups: those who received a treatment liable to modify the EEG tracing, and those who did not.
Conventional EEG recordings are collected from the neurophysiology departments of participating level-3 maternity hospitals over the period 01 January 2016 to 30 April 2026.
No follow-up or sampling is performed.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
310
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Mathilde LETOUZEY, M.D
- Phone Number: + 33171738599
- Email: mathilde.letouzey@aphp.fr
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Term newborns ≥ 36 weeks gestational age, birth weight ≥ 1800 g, with suspected hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in a context of perinatal asphyxia, whose non-compressed conventional EEG recordings are available in participating centers.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- No parental opposition to the use of the child's medical data within 1 month of the mailed information notice
- Gestational age ≥ 36 weeks of amenorrhea
- Birth weight ≥ 1800 g
- Born in a context of perinatal asphyxia (any cause) leading to suspected HIE, with EITHER biological signs of metabolic acidosis (pH ≤ 7 or base deficit ≥ 16 mmol/L or lactate ≥ 11 mmol/L within the first hour of life, any blood sample) OR a history of asphyxia with Apgar ≤ 5 at 10 minutes or need for ventilatory resuscitation continued at 10 minutes of life
- Non-compressed conventional EEG (EEGc) recorded before the 6th hour of life
- EEG including the signal of active electrodes Fp1, Fp2, T3 and T4
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participation in a therapeutic biomedical research liable to modify the EEG tracing
- Fewer than 20 minutes of artifact-free EEG recording
- Signal from active electrodes Fp1, Fp2, T3 and T4 not exploitable
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Term newborns with suspected HIE
Single study population: term newborns (≥ 36 weeks, ≥ 1800 g) with suspected hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in a context of perinatal asphyxia, with an available non-compressed conventional EEG.
This is a diagnostic-accuracy validation study (STARD), not a comparative two-arm design.
The treated / untreated distinction is a pre-specified analysis subgroup only, not a study group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm versus the gold standard for discriminating mild vs moderate/severe HIE
Time Frame: Within the first 6 hours of life
|
Diagnostic performance computed against the reference EEG reading by pediatric neurophysiologists complemented by clinical data; 95% confidence intervals by the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.
|
Within the first 6 hours of life
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PPV, NPV, false-alarm ratio, accuracy, balanced accuracy and F1-score of the algorithm vs gold standard (overall and by subgroup)
Time Frame: Within the first 6 hours of life
|
Secondary diagnostic-performance metrics computed overall and within the treated / untreated subgroups.
|
Within the first 6 hours of life
|
|
Proportion of transfers not leading to therapeutic hypothermia
Time Frame: During the initial hospitalization (up to 28 days of life)
|
Share of included newborns not treated by therapeutic hypothermia at the time, including those transferred from a level 1/2a/2b maternity or managed within the same facility.
|
During the initial hospitalization (up to 28 days of life)
|
|
Evaluate the inter-rater agreement between the first two expert neurophysiologists
Time Frame: EEG recordings from the first 6 hours of life
|
Inter-rater agreement will be assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), with a 95% confidence interval.
|
EEG recordings from the first 6 hours of life
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
September 16, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 16, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 16, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 11, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
August 13, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 13, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 11, 2026
Last Verified
August 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- APHP261081
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
AP-HP is the sole owner of the data.
Individual participant data are not planned to be shared; any use or transmission to a third party requires the sponsor's prior authorization, under conditions ensuring confidentiality and a level of protection equivalent to EU legislation.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.