Effect of AI-Supported Virtual Patient Chatbot Training on Nursing Students' Self-Perceived Clinical Decision-Making and Gynecological Cancer Knowledge

September 20, 2026 updated by: Ahsen Demirhan, Sakarya University

Effect of AI-Supported Virtual Patient Chatbot Training on Nursing Students' Self-Perceived Clinical Decision-Making and Gynecological Cancer Knowledge: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of structured case-based training delivered through an artificial intelligence-supported educational virtual patient chatbot platform on nursing students' gynecological cancer knowledge and self-perceived clinical decision-making. Third-year undergraduate nursing students who had completed the Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing course were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention group or an assessment-only wait-list control group. The intervention group completed five AI-supported virtual patient training scenarios during a two-week access period, followed by a common virtual patient assessment. The control group completed the same virtual patient assessment without access to the training scenarios during the study assessment period. Knowledge and self-perceived clinical decision-making were assessed at baseline and immediately after the assigned study procedures. Virtual patient performance was assessed once at the final assessment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Turkey
      • Sakarya, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye), 54050
        • Sakarya University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled as a third-year undergraduate nursing student.
  • Successfully completed the Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing (Women's Health and Diseases Nursing) course.
  • Volunteered to participate and provided digital informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

- No additional exclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AI-Supported Virtual Patient Chatbot Training Group

Participants received access to five sequential AI-supported educational virtual patient scenarios addressing cervical, endometrial, ovarian, vulvar, and vaginal cancers. The scenarios were completed during a two-week access period. Participants responded in free text, received immediate individualized formative feedback, and were allowed up to three response attempts per scenario. After completing all five training scenarios, participants completed the common virtual patient assessment and the immediate post-intervention outcome assessments.

A web-based educational platform integrating structured gynecological oncology scenarios, AI-supported virtual patient interaction, predefined performance criteria, sequential progression, and immediate individualized formative feedback. Participants completed five training scenarios during a two-week access period. The platform used the Claude Sonnet 4 model, API identifier claude-sonnet-4-20250514, throughout the study.

No Intervention: Assessment-Only Wait-List Control Group

Participants did not receive access to the AI-supported training scenarios during the outcome assessment period. They completed the baseline assessments, the same common virtual patient assessment as the intervention group, and the immediate post-assessment knowledge and clinical decision-making measures. After completing all study outcome assessments, they were granted access to the AI-supported educational scenarios.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Scale-Turkish Version (CDMNS-Tr) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, before access to any group-specific study procedure, and immediately after completion of the assigned study procedures.

The CDMNS-Tr is a 40-item scale assessing self-reported clinical decision-making. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always), with eighteen negatively worded items being reverse-scored. Total scores range from 40 to 200, with higher scores indicating a higher self-perception of clinical decision-making abilities.

Baseline, before access to any group-specific study procedure, and immediately after completion of the assigned study procedures.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Gynecological Oncology Knowledge Test Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, before access to any group-specific study procedure, and immediately after completion of the assigned study procedures, within approximately two weeks after baseline.

The researcher-developed test consists of 15 multiple-choice items assessing the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, complications, and nursing care of gynecological cancers. Correct answers are scored as 1 and incorrect or unanswered items as 0. Total scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. Change was evaluated by comparing baseline and immediate post-intervention total scores.

Baseline, before access to any group-specific study procedure, and immediately after completion of the assigned study procedures, within approximately two weeks after baseline.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 29, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe