Effect of Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy on Event-Free Survival Among Children With High-risk First-Relapse B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Franco Locatelli, Gerhard Zugmaier, Carmelo Rizzari, Joan D Morris, Bernd Gruhn, Thomas Klingebiel, Rosanna Parasole, Christin Linderkamp, Christian Flotho, Arnaud Petit, Concetta Micalizzi, Noemi Mergen, Abeera Mohammad, William N Kormany, Cornelia Eckert, Anja Möricke, Mary Sartor, Ondrej Hrusak, Christina Peters, Vaskar Saha, Luciana Vinti, Arend von Stackelberg, Franco Locatelli, Gerhard Zugmaier, Carmelo Rizzari, Joan D Morris, Bernd Gruhn, Thomas Klingebiel, Rosanna Parasole, Christin Linderkamp, Christian Flotho, Arnaud Petit, Concetta Micalizzi, Noemi Mergen, Abeera Mohammad, William N Kormany, Cornelia Eckert, Anja Möricke, Mary Sartor, Ondrej Hrusak, Christina Peters, Vaskar Saha, Luciana Vinti, Arend von Stackelberg

Abstract

Importance: Blinatumomab is a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific T-cell engager molecule with efficacy in children with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

Objective: To evaluate event-free survival in children with high-risk first-relapse B-ALL after a third consolidation course with blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Design, setting, and participants: In this randomized phase 3 clinical trial, patients were enrolled November 2015 to July 2019 (data cutoff, July 17, 2019). Investigators at 47 centers in 13 countries enrolled children older than 28 days and younger than 18 years with high-risk first-relapse B-ALL in morphologic complete remission (M1 marrow, <5% blasts) or with M2 marrow (blasts ≥5% and <25%) at randomization.

Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive 1 cycle of blinatumomab (n = 54; 15 μg/m2/d for 4 weeks, continuous intravenous infusion) or chemotherapy (n = 54) for the third consolidation.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was event-free survival (events: relapse, death, second malignancy, or failure to achieve complete remission). The key secondary efficacy end point was overall survival. Other secondary end points included minimal residual disease remission and incidence of adverse events.

Results: A total of 108 patients were randomized (median age, 5.0 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 4.0-10.5]; 51.9% girls; 97.2% M1 marrow) and all patients were included in the analysis. Enrollment was terminated early for benefit of blinatumomab in accordance with a prespecified stopping rule. After a median of 22.4 months of follow-up (IQR, 8.1-34.2), the incidence of events in the blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy groups was 31% vs 57% (log-rank P < .001; hazard ratio [HR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.18-0.61]). Deaths occurred in 8 patients (14.8%) in the blinatumomab group and 16 (29.6%) in the consolidation chemotherapy group. The overall survival HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.18-1.01). Minimal residual disease remission was observed in more patients in the blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy group (90% [44/49] vs 54% [26/48]; difference, 35.6% [95% CI, 15.6%-52.5%]). No fatal adverse events were reported. In the blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy group, the incidence of serious adverse events was 24.1% vs 43.1%, respectively, and the incidence of adverse events greater than or equal to grade 3 was 57.4% vs 82.4%. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 2 patients in the blinatumomab group.

Conclusions and relevance: Among children with high-risk first-relapse B-ALL, treatment with 1 cycle of blinatumomab compared with standard intensive multidrug chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant resulted in an improved event-free survival at a median of 22.4 months of follow-up.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02393859.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Locatelli reports receiving personal fees from Amgen Speakers' Bureau and advisory board membership, Novartis Speakers' Bureau and advisory board membership, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals advisory board membership, Miltenyi Speakers' Bureau, Jazz Pharmaceutical Speakers' Bureau, Takeda Speakers' Bureau, Neovii advisory board membership, and Medac Speakers' Bureau outside the submitted work. Dr Zugmaier reports receiving personal fees from Amgen outside the submitted work, receiving issue of patents (20190300609, 20130323247, and 20110262440), and having patents pending (10696744, 10662243, 20190142846, 20190142846, 20170327581, 10130638, 9688760, 20170122947, 9486475, 20160208001, 9192665, 20150071928, 8840888, 20140228316, 20140227272, 20130287778, and 20130287774). Dr Rizzari reports receiving personal fees from SOBI Advisory Board during the conduct of the study. Dr Morris reports receiving personal fees from Amgen employee during the conduct of the study and personal fees from and employment at Amgen. Dr Klingebiel reports receiving grants from Amgen GmbH during the conduct of the study. Dr Mergen reports employment by Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH. Ms Mohammad reports being an employee and shareholder of Amgen Ltd. Dr Eckert reports receiving other from Amgen Service for central minimal residual disease quantification during the conduct of the study. Dr Möricke reports receiving other from Amgen Payments to the institution for laboratory work during the conduct of the study. Dr Sartor reports receiving grants from Amgen during the conduct of the study. Dr Hrusak reports receiving grants from Amgen covering costs of minimal residual disease monitoring by cytometry during the conduct of the study. Dr Peters reports receiving personal fees from Amgen during the conduct of the study; grants from Amgen, Medac, Neovii, and Riemser outside the submitted work; and personal fees from Novartis, Amgen, and Jazz outside the submitted work. Dr Saha reports receiving personal fees from Amgen during the conduct of the study. Dr von Stackelberg reports receiving personal fees from Amgen Advisory Board during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Novartis Advisory Board, MorphoSys Advisory Board, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Advisory Board, and Shire Advisory Board outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Flow of Patients Through the…
Figure 1.. Flow of Patients Through the Trial of Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy in Children With B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)
Randomized patients were stratified based on age and bone marrow/minimal residual disease. M1 marrow is indicated as aData cutoff date occurred when 50% of total enrollment experienced defined study survival events. The final analysis is planned for January 2023.
Figure 2.. Efficacy End Points of Blinatumomab…
Figure 2.. Efficacy End Points of Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy
Vertical bars indicate censoring. A, Event free survival from randomization to relapse, all-cause death, second malignancy, or failure to achieve complete remission at treatment end. Patients who did not achieve remission or died before assessment were assigned 1 day of event-free survival. Patients alive and event free were censored on their last assessment date. Median (IQR) observation: 22.4 (8.1-34.2) months. B, Overall survival from randomization to death from any cause. Median (IQR) observation: 19.5 (7.8-31.6) months. C, Cumulative incidence of relapse, with death due to other causes as a competing factor, truncated at last relapse event (23.1 months chemotherapy and 24.8 months blinatumomab). Median (IQR) observation: 22.4 (8.1-34.2) months.
Figure 3.. Event-Free Survival by Study Subgroups
Figure 3.. Event-Free Survival by Study Subgroups
A Cox regression model tested for treatment × subgroup interaction.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe