The Experiences and Needs of Families of Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest and Severe Neurotrauma: The Perspectives of National Key Stakeholders During a National Institutes of Health-Funded Workshop

Susanne Muehlschlegel, Sarah M Perman, Jonathan Elmer, Adrianne Haggins, Natalie D Teixeira Bailey, Jennifer Huang, Liz Jansky, Jessica Kirchner, Renee Kasperek-Wynn, Paula Darby Lipman, Sharon D Yeatts, Michael D Fetters, Neal W Dickert, Robert Silbergleit, Susanne Muehlschlegel, Sarah M Perman, Jonathan Elmer, Adrianne Haggins, Natalie D Teixeira Bailey, Jennifer Huang, Liz Jansky, Jessica Kirchner, Renee Kasperek-Wynn, Paula Darby Lipman, Sharon D Yeatts, Michael D Fetters, Neal W Dickert, Robert Silbergleit

Abstract

Objectives: Severe acute brain injury (SABI) from cardiac arrest and traumatic brain injury happens suddenly and unexpectedly, carrying high potential for lifelong disability with substantial prognostic uncertainty. Comprehensive assessments of family experiences and support needs after SABI are lacking. Our objective is to elicit "on-the-ground" perspectives about the experiences and needs of families of patients with SABI.

Design: Two-phase qualitative study of families and multidisciplinary U.S. healthcare professionals (mHCPs) with expertise in SABI: Phase 1 included semistructured interviews to generate formative findings; phase 2 entailed facilitated discussions to confirm and expand initial findings.

Setting: Phase 1: academic medical center; phase 2: virtual workshop.

Subjects: Phase 1 included seven family members and 12 mHCPs. Phase 2 included nationally recruited stakeholders (17 family members and 12 mHCPs).

Intervention: None.

Measurements and results: We explored: 1) what are families' needs in the first 48 hours? 2) How are these needs addressed? and 3) How can hospitals better meet these needs? Qualitative analysis included inductive and deductive approaches guided by a conceptual ecological model. Four major needs were identified: 1) challenges in coping with uncertainty in early prognostication, 2) inattention to physical needs of family, 3) deficits in compassionate and consistent communication, and 4) need for engagement with families as stakeholders in improving future practices. Participants' recommendations included: 1) ways to communicate more clearly and consistently, 2) better assistance with navigating resources and access to places for families to care for themselves, and 3) opportunities for families to remain connected with their loved ones, social support networks, and the clinical team.

Conclusions: Stakeholders identified novel insights regarding families' experiences during the hospitalization of comatose SABI patients and factors that can contribute to improved decision-making and physical/emotional outcomes. Interventions to address these unmet needs are promising targets to improve outcomes.

Keywords: cardiac arrest; emergency medicine; family experience; neurocritical care; physician-family communication; qualitative research; traumatic brain injury.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Analytical framework. We applied a framework, grouping family members’ experiences into five domains based on an ecological model adapted from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities where there are multiple and bidirectional interactions among the domains and levels of influence (12). The five domains included: information (verbal or written information about the patient’s status or care and navigating the hospital), communication (how this information is conveyed to the family member), emotional (range of emotional needs), sociocultural (how cultural, religious, and social beliefs affect family members’ experiences), and physical (how the hospital physical environment can be better suited for family members). ED = emergency department.

References

    1. Cai X, Robinson J, Muehlschlegel S, et al. : Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in neuroscience intensive care units. Neurocrit Care 2015; 23:131–141
    1. Scheunemann LP, Arnold RM, White DB: The facilitated values history: Helping surrogates make authentic decisions for incapacitated patients with advanced illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186:480–486
    1. Wendler D, Rid A: Systematic review: The effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154:336–346
    1. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, et al. ; FAMIREA Study Group: Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171:987–994
    1. Pochard F, Darmon M, Fassier T, et al. ; French FAMIREA study group: Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients before discharge or death. A prospective multicenter study. J Crit Care 2005; 20:90–96
    1. Cox CE, White DB, Hough CL, et al. : Effects of a personalized web-based decision aid for surrogate decision makers of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: A randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170:285–297
    1. White DB, Angus DC, Shields AM, et al. ; PARTNER Investigators: A randomized trial of a family-support intervention in intensive care units. N Engl J Med 2018; 378:2365–2375
    1. Wendlandt B, Ceppe A, Cox CE, et al. : The association between patient health status and surrogate decision maker post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in chronic critical illness. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 18:1868–1875
    1. Quinn T, Moskowitz J, Khan MW, et al. : What families need and physicians deliver: Contrasting communication preferences between surrogate decision-makers and physicians during outcome prognostication in critically ill TBI patients. Neurocrit Care 2017; 27:154–162
    1. Jones K, Quinn T, Mazor KM, et al. : Prognostic uncertainty in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicenter qualitative study. Neurocrit Care 2021; 35:311–321
    1. Lau B, Kirkpatrick JN, Merchant RM, et al. : Experiences of sudden cardiac arrest survivors regarding prognostication and advance care planning. Resuscitation 2010; 81:982–986
    1. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities: NIMHD Research Framework. 2017. Available at: . Accessed March 29, 2021
    1. Sallis Neville Owen JF, Fisher EB: Chapter 20: Ecological models of health behavior. In: Health Behavior and Health Education. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. (Eds). Fourth Edition. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 2008
    1. Hwang DY: Caring for patients’ families (or lack of family) in neurocritical care. Neurocrit Care 2017; 27:151–153
    1. Muehlschlegel S, Shutter L, Col N, et al. : Decision aids and shared decision-making in neurocritical care: An unmet need in our NeuroICUs. Neurocrit Care 2015; 23:127–130
    1. Evans LR, Boyd EA, Malvar G, et al. : Surrogate decision-makers’ perspectives on discussing prognosis in the face of uncertainty. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 179:48–53
    1. Christakis NA, Iwashyna TJ: Attitude and self-reported practice regarding prognostication in a national sample of internists. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:2389–2395
    1. Creutzfeldt CJ, Holloway RG: Treatment decisions after severe stroke: Uncertainty and biases. Stroke 2012; 43:3405–3408
    1. Hemphill JC, 3rd, White DB: Clinical nihilism in neuroemergencies. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2009; 27:27–37
    1. Krawczyk M, Gallagher R: Communicating prognostic uncertainty in potential end-of-life contexts: Experiences of family members. BMC Palliat Care 2016; 15:59.
    1. Smith E, Belisle-Pipon JC, Resnik D: Patients as research partners; how to value their perceptions, contribution and labor? Citiz Sci 2019; 4. Doi: 10.5334/cstp.184
    1. Ejiogu N, Norbeck JH, Mason MA, et al. : Recruitment and retention strategies for minority or poor clinical research participants: Lessons from the healthy aging in neighborhoods of diversity across the life span study. Gerontologist 2011; 51(Suppl 1):S33–S45
    1. Suen AO, Butler RA, Arnold RM, et al. : A pilot randomized trial of an interactive web-based tool to support surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 18:1191–1201
    1. Muehlschlegel S, Hwang DY, Flahive J, et al. : Goals-of-care decision aid for critically ill patients with TBI: Development and feasibility testing. Neurology 2020; 95:e179–e193
    1. Goostrey KJ, Lee C, Jones K, et al. : Adapting a traumatic brain injury goals-of-care decision aid for critically ill patients to intracerebral hemorrhage and hemispheric acute ischemic stroke. Crit Care Explor 2021; 3:e0357.
    1. Chen EP, Arslanian-Engoren C, Newhouse W, et al. : Development and usability testing of understanding stroke, a tailored life-sustaining treatment decision support tool for stroke surrogate decision makers. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:110.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe