Study protocol: an early intervention program to improve motor outcome in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial and a qualitative study of physiotherapy performance and parental experiences

Gunn Kristin Oberg, Suzann K Campbell, Gay L Girolami, Tordis Ustad, Lone Jørgensen, Per Ivar Kaaresen, Gunn Kristin Oberg, Suzann K Campbell, Gay L Girolami, Tordis Ustad, Lone Jørgensen, Per Ivar Kaaresen

Abstract

Background: Knowledge about early physiotherapy to preterm infants is sparse, given the risk of delayed motor development and cerebral palsy.

Methods/design: A pragmatic randomized controlled study has been designed to assess the effect of a preventative physiotherapy program carried out in the neonatal intensive care unit. Moreover, a qualitative study is carried out to assess the physiotherapy performance and parents' experiences with the intervention. The aim of the physiotherapy program is to improve motor development i.e. postural control and selective movements in these infants. 150 infants will be included and randomized to either intervention or standard follow-up. The infants in the intervention group will be given specific stimulation to facilitate movements based on the individual infant's development, behavior and needs. The physiotherapist teaches the parents how to do the intervention and the parents receive a booklet with photos and descriptions of the intervention. Intervention is carried out twice a day for three weeks (week 34, 35, 36 postmenstrual age). Standardized tests are carried out at baseline, term age and at three, six, 12 and 24 months corrected age. In addition eight triads (infant, parent and physiotherapist) are observed and videotaped in four clinical encounters each to assess the process of physiotherapy performance. The parents are also interviewed on their experiences with the intervention and how it influences on the parent-child relationship. Eight parents from the follow up group are interviewed about their experience. The interviews are performed according to the same schedule as the standardized measurements. Primary outcome is at two years corrected age.

Discussion: The paper presents the protocol for a randomized controlled trial designed to study the effect of physiotherapy to preterm infants at neonatal intensive care units. It also studies physiotherapy performance and the parent's experiences with the intervention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01089296.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the quantitative study, part one.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of the qualitative study, part two.

References

    1. de Kieviet JF, Piek JP, Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Oosterlaan J. Motor development in very preterm and very low-birth-weight children from birth to adolescence. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;302:2235–2242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1708.
    1. Blauw-Hospers CH, Hadders-Algra M. A systematic review of the effects of early intervention on motor development. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:421–432. doi: 10.1017/S0012162205000824.
    1. Koldewijn K, Wassenaer AV, Wolf M-J, Meijssen D, Houtzager B, Beelen A. et al.A Neurobehavioral Intervention and Assessment Program in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: outcome at 24 Months. J Pediatr. 2009;156:359–365.
    1. Kaaresen PI, Rønning JA, Tunby J, Nordhov SM, Ulvund SE, Dahl LB. A randomized controlled trial of an early intervention program in low birth weight children: outcome at 2 years. Early Hum Dev. 2008;84:201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.07.003.
    1. Kaaresen PI, Rønning JA, Ulvund SE, Dahl LB. A Randomized, Controlled trial of the Effectiveness of an Early-Intervention program in Reducing Parenting Stress After preterm Birth. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e9–e19. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1491.
    1. Girolami GL, Campbell SK. Efficacy of a Neuro-Developmental Treatment program to Improve Motor Control in Infants Born Prematurely. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1994;6:175–184.
    1. Cameron EC, Maehle V, Reid J. The effects of an early physical therapy intervention for very preterm, very low birth weight infants. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2005;17:107–119. doi: 10.1097/01.PEP.0000163073.50852.58.
    1. Parker SJ, Zahr I, Cole J. Outcomes after developmental intervention in the neonatal intensive care unit for mothers of preterm infants with low socioeconomic status. J Pediatr. 1992;120:780–785. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80248-3.
    1. Goldstein LA, Campbell SK. Effectiveness of the test of infant motor performance as an educational tool for mothers. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2008;20:152–159. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181729de8.
    1. Nugent JK, Eefer CH, Minear S, Johnson LC, Blanchard Y. Understanding Newborn Behavior and Early Relationship. The Newborn Behavioral Observations (NBO) System Handbook. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing CO; 2007.
    1. Trevarthen C. In: In Before speech. The beginning of interpersonal communication. 1. Bullowa M, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979. Communication and cooperation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity; pp. 321–437.
    1. Norhov SM, Kaaresen PI, Rønning JA, Ulvund SE, Dahl LB. A randomized study of the impact of a sensitizing intervention on the child-rearing attitudes of parents of low birth weight preterm infants. Scand J Psychol. 2010;51:385–391.
    1. Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge publishing; 2005.
    1. Gallagher S. How the Body Shapes the Mind. 1. New York: Oxford University press Inc; 2005.
    1. Sheets-Johnstone M. The Primacy of Movement. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 1999.
    1. Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008;371:261–269. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60136-1.
    1. Dahl LB, Kaaresen PI, Tunby J, Handegård BH, Kvernmo S, Rønning JA. Emotianal, behavioral, social, and academic outcomes in adolescents born with very low birth weight. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e449–e459. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3024.
    1. Norhov SM, Rønning JA, Dahl LB, Ulvund SE, Tunby J, Kaaresen PI. Early Intervention Improves Cognitive Outcomes for Preterm Infants: randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e1088–e1094. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0778.
    1. Sheets-Johnstone M. In: In The primacy of Movement. Sheets-Johnstone M, editor. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 1999. On learning to Move Oneself. A constuctive Phenomenology; pp. 223–272.
    1. Sheets-Johnstone M. In: In The Primacy of Movement. Sheets-Johnstone M, editor. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 1999. The Primacy of Movement; pp. 131–174.
    1. Adolph KE, Robinson SR, Young JW, Gill-Alvarez F. What is the shape of developmental change? Psychol Rev. 2008;115:527–543.
    1. Darrah J, Redfern L, Maguire TO, Beaulne AP, Watt J. Intra-individual stability of rate of gross motor development in full-term infants. Early Hum Dev. 1998;52:169–179. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3782(98)00028-0.
    1. Campbell SK. In: In Physical Therapy for Children. 4. Campbell SK, Palisano RJ, Orlin MN, editor. St.Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. The Child's Development of Functional Movement; pp. 37–86.
    1. Brodal P. The central nervous system: structure and function. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
    1. Westcott Mccoy S, Dusing S. In: In Physical Therapy for Children. 4. Campbell SK, Palisano RJ, Orlin MN, editor. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. Motor control: developmental aspects of motor control in skill acquisition; pp. 87–150.
    1. Bracewell M, Marlow N. Patterns of motor disability in very preterm children. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8:241–248. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10049.
    1. Fallang B. PhD thesis. University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine; 2004. Development in infants born preterm. A study of the characteristics of reaching and postural control.
    1. Øberg GK. PhD thesis. University of Tromsø, Faculty of Medicine; 2008. Fysioterapi til for tidlig fødte barn. Om sensitivitet, samhandling og bevegelse.
    1. Luciana M. Cognitive development in children born preterm: implications for theories of brain plasticity following early injury. Dev Psychopathol. 2003;15:1017–1047.
    1. Kinney H, Brody B, Kloman A, Gilles F. Sequence of central nervous system myelination in human infancy. II. Patterns of myelination in autopsied infants. J Neuropath Exper Neurol. 1988;47:217–234. doi: 10.1097/00005072-198805000-00003.
    1. Fields RD. Volume transmission in activity-dependent regulation of myelinationg glia. Neurochem Int. 2004;45:503–509. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2003.11.015.
    1. Folio MR, Fewell RR. PDMS-2, Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Examiner's Manual. 2. Austin, Texas: Pro-ed; 2000.
    1. Prechtl HFR. The Neurological Examination of the Full-term Newborn Infant. 2. London: William Heinemann Medical Books LTD; 1977.
    1. Campbell SK. The Test of Infant Motor Performance, Test User's Manual Version 2.0. Chicago: Infant Motor Performance Scales, LLC; 2005.
    1. Lekskulchai R, Cole J. Effect of a developmental program on motor performance in infants born preterm. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47:169–176.
    1. Einspieler C, Prechtl HFR, Bos AF, Ferrari F, Cioni G. Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants. 1. London: Mac Keith Press; 2004.
    1. Snider LM, Majnemer A, Mazer B, Campbell S, Bos AF. A comparison of the general movements assessment with traditional approaches to newborn and infant assessment: concurrent validity. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2009;21:2–11. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181957bdc.
    1. Prechtl HFR, Einspieler C, Cioni G, Bos AF, Ferrari F, Sontheimer D. An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. Lancet. 1997;439:1361–1363.
    1. Einspieler C, Cioni G, Paolicelli PB, Bos AF, Dressler A, Ferrari F. et al.The early markers for later dyskinetic cerebral palsy are different from those for spastic cerebral palsy. Neuropediatrics. 2002;33:73–78. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32368.
    1. Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant. Pennsylvania: W.B. Saunders Company; 1994.
    1. Darrah J, Piper M, Watt MJ. Assessment of gross motor skills of at-risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40:485–491.
    1. Pin T, Eldridge B, Galea M. Motor trajectories from 4 to 18 months corrected age in infants born at less than 30 weeks of gestation. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86:573–580. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.07.008.
    1. Wang H-H, Liao H-F, Hsieh C-L. Reliability, Sensitivity to Change, and Responsiveness of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition for Children With Cerebral Palsy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1351–1359. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050259.
    1. Als H. Developmental care in the newborn intensive care unit. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1998;10:138–142. doi: 10.1097/00008480-199804000-00004.
    1. Als H, Gilkerson L, Duffy F, McAnulty G, Buehler D, Vandenberg K. A three-center, randomized, controlled trial of individualized developmental care for very low birth weight preterm infants: medical, neurodevelopmental, parenting and caregiving effects. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;24:399–408. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200312000-00001.
    1. Crabtree B, Miller W. Doing qualitative research. 2. California: Sage Publications; 1999.
    1. Lindseth A, Norberg A. A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18:145–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00258.x.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe