How experience makes a difference: practitioners' views on the use of deferred consent in paediatric and neonatal emergency care trials

Kerry Woolfall, Lucy Frith, Carrol Gamble, Bridget Young, Kerry Woolfall, Lucy Frith, Carrol Gamble, Bridget Young

Abstract

Background: In 2008 UK legislation was amended to enable the use of deferred consent for paediatric emergency care (EC) trials in recognition of the practical and ethical difficulties of obtaining prospective consent in an emergency situation. However, ambiguity about how to make deferred consent acceptable to parents, children and practitioners remains. In particular, little is known about practitioners' views and experiences of seeking deferred consent in this setting.

Methods: As part of a wider study investigating consent methods in paediatric emergency care trials (called CONNECT), a 20 item online questionnaire was sent by email inviting practitioners (doctors and nurses) who were involved in talking with families about children's and young people's (aged 0-16 years) participation in UK EC trials. To ensure those with and without experience of deferred consent were included, practitioners were sampled using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling methods. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data, whilst the constant comparative method was used to analyse qualitative data. Elements of a symbiotic empirical ethics approach was used to integrate empirical evidence and bioethical literature to explore the data and draw practice orientated conclusions.

Results: Views on deferred consent differed depending upon whether or not practitioners were experienced in this consent method. Practitioners who had no experience of deferred consent reported negative perceptions of this consent method; these practitioners were concerned about the impact that deferred consent would have upon the parent-practitioner relationship. In contrast, practitioners experienced in deferred consent described how families had been receptive to the consent method, if conducted sensitively and in a time appropriate manner. Experienced practitioners also described how deferred consent had improved recruitment, parental decision-making capacity and parent-practitioner relationships in the emergency care setting.

Conclusions: The views of practitioners with first-hand experience of deferred consent should be considered in the design and ethical review of future paediatric EC trials; the design and ethical review of such trials should not solely be informed by the beliefs of those without experience of using deferred consent. Further research involving parents and children is required to inform practitioner training and normative guidance on the use and appropriateness of deferred consent in emergency settings.

References

    1. Caldwell PHY, Dans L, De Vries MC, Newman BA Hons J, Sammons H, Spriggs MB, Merle T, Ambe P, Van’t Hoff W, Woolfall K, Young B. et al.Standard 1: Consent and Recruitment. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):S118–S123.
    1. Paediatrics RCo, Committee CHEA. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Arch Dis Child. 2000;82(2):177–182. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.2.177.
    1. Roberts I, Prieto-Merino D, Shakur H, Chalmers I, Nicholl J. Effect of consent rituals on mortality in emergency care research. Lancet. 2011;377(9771):1071–1072. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60317-6.
    1. Maitland K, Molyyneux S, Boga M, Kiguli S, Lang T. Use of deferred consent for severely ill children in a multi-centre phase III trial. Trials. 2011;12:90. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-90.
    1. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
    1. Gill D. Ethical principles and operational guidelines for good clinical practice in paediatric research. Recommendations of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP) Eur J Pediatr. 2004;163(2):53–57. doi: 10.1007/s00431-003-1378-5.
    1. Shilling V, Williamson PR, Hickey H, Sowden E, Beresford MW, Smyth RL, Young B. Communication about Children’s Clinical Trials as Observed and Experienced: Qualitative Study of Parents and Practitioners. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7):e21604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021604.
    1. Flory J, Emanuel E. Interventions to Improve Research Participants’ Understanding in Informed Consent for Research. JAMA. 2004;292(13):1593–1601. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.13.1593.
    1. Sheu S-J, Wei I-L, Chen C-H, Yu S, Tang F-I. Using snowball sampling method with nurses to understand medication administration errors. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(4):559–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02048.x.
    1. Miller VA, Ittenbach RF, Harris D, Reynolds WW, Beauchamp TL, Luce MF, Nelson RM. The Decision Making Control Instrument to Assess Voluntary Consent. Med Decis Making. 2011;31(5):730–741. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11398666.
    1. Brierley J, Larcher V. Emergency research in children: Options for ethical recruitment. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(7):429–432. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040667.
    1. Eucker SA, Barrett TW, Schriger DL. Are two drugs better than one for acute agitation? a discussion on black box warnings, waiver of informed consent, and the ethics of enrolling impaired subjects in clinical trials. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(1):82–83. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.040.
    1. Vanpee D, Gillet JB, Dupuis M. Clinical trials in an emergency setting: implications from the fifth version of the Declaration of Helsinki. J Emerg Med. 2004;26(1):127–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.04.007.
    1. Cooke RWI. Good practice in consent. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;10(1):63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2004.09.009.
    1. Lecouturier J, Rodgers H, Ford G, Rapley T, Stobbart L, Louw S, Murtagh M. Clinical research without consent in adults in the emergency setting: a review of patient and public views. BMC Med Ethics. 2008;9(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-9.
    1. Farnell SM. Medical research: Why trouble the patient for informed consent? Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002;39(3):207–209. doi: 10.1002/mpo.10109.
    1. Baines P. Assent for children’s participation in research is incoherent and wrong. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(10):960–962. doi: 10.1136/adc.2011.211342.
    1. Adams JG, Wegener J. Acting without asking: an ethical analysis of the food and drug administration waiver of informed consent for emergency research. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33(2):218–223. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70398-7.
    1. Gamble C, Nadel S, Snape D, McKay A, Hickey H, Williamson P, Glennie L, Snowdon C, Young B. What parents of children who have received emergency care think about deferring consent in randomised trials of emergency treatments: postal survey. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e35982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035982.
    1. Baren JM, Nathanson PG. Recruitment and communication process for participation in the 2005 AEM consensus conference on the ethical conduct of resuscitation research: methodology, challenges, lessons learned. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(11):1027–1030. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2005.tb00824.x.
    1. Tindana PO, Singh JA, Tracy CS, Upshur REG, Daar AS, Singer PA, Frohlich J, Lavery JV. Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2007;4(9):e273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040273.
    1. Shamoo AE. Letter to the editor: emergency research consent waiver—a proper way. Am J Bioeth. 2006;6(4):W48–W51. doi: 10.1080/15265160600843577.
    1. McClure KB, DeIorio NM, Gunnels MD, Ochsner MJ, Biros MH, Schmidt TA. Attitudes of Emergency Department Patients and Visitors Regarding Emergency Exception from Informed Consent in Resuscitation Research, Community Consultation, and Public Notification. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(4):352–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01348.x.
    1. . Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations. 2004. 10: SI 2004/1031 2004.
    1. Gamble C, Woolfall K, Williamson P, Appleton R, Young B. New European Union regulation of clinical trials is conflicting on deferred consent in emergency situations. BMJ. 2013;346:346. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f346.
    1. . The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations (2006) 10. 2006.
    1. . The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) and Blood Safety and Quality (Amendment) Regulations 2008 941. 10. 2008.
    1. Fost N, Robertson J. Deferring Consent with Incompetent Patients in an Intensive Care Unit. IRB. 1980;2(7):5–6. doi: 10.2307/3564363.
    1. Kottow M. The battering of informed consent. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(6):565–569. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.002949.
    1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Finland: Helsinki; 2004.
    1. Jansen TC, Kompanje EJ, Druml C, Menon DK, Wiedermann CJ, Bakker J. Deferred consent in emergency intensive care research: what if the patient dies early? Use the data or not? Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:894–900. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0580-8.
    1. Gray JD. The problem of consent in emergency medicine research. Can J Emerg Med. 2001;3(3):213–218.
    1. Guarte JM, Barrios EB. Estimation Under Purposive Sampling. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. 2006;35(2):277–284. doi: 10.1080/03610910600591610.
    1. Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball sampling - problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Methods Res. 1981;10(2):141–163.
    1. Mok Q, Gilbert R. Interventions to reduce central venous catheter-associated infections in children: which ones are beneficial? Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(4):566–568. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2135-2.
    1. Stiles WB. Evaluating qualitative research. Evid Based Ment Health. 1999;2(4):99–101. doi: 10.1136/ebmh.2.4.99.
    1. Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436–445. doi: 10.2307/798843.
    1. Frith L. Symbiotic empirical ethics: a practical methodology. Bioethics. 2012;26(4):198–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01843.x.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
    1. Azzopardi D, Brocklehurst P, Edwards D, Halliday H, Levene M, Thoresen M, Whitelaw A. The TOBY study. whole body hypothermia for the treatment of perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatrics. 2008;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-8-17.
    1. Salloch S, Schildmann J, Vollmann J. Empirical research in medical ethics: How conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice. BMC Med Ethics. 2012;13:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-1.
    1. Chamberlain J, Lillis K, Vance C, Brown K, Fawumi O, Nichols S, Davis C, Singh T, Baren J. Perceived challenges to obtaining informed consent for a time-sensitive emergency Department Study of Pediatric Status Epilepticus: results of two focus groups. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(8):763–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00455.x.
    1. Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(12):1143–1156. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00141-9.
    1. Scholefield BR, Lyttle MD, Berry K, Duncan HP, Morris KP. Survey of the use of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest in UK paediatric emergency departments. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(1):24–27. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200348.
    1. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Klitzman R. Voluntariness of consent to research: a conceptual model. Hastings Cent Rep. 2009;39(1):30–39. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0103.
    1. Nelson RM, Beauchamp T, Miller VA, Reynolds W, Ittenbach RF, Luce MF. The concept of voluntary consent. Am J Bioeth. 2011;11(8):6–16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583318.
    1. Chalmers I, Lindley R. In: Informed Consent in Medical Research. Doyal LT, editor. J.S. London: BMJ; 2001. Double standards on informed consent to treatment; pp. 266–275.
    1. Byrne-Davis L, Salmon P, Gravenhorst K, Eden T, Young B. Balancing high accrual and ethical recruitment in paediatric oncology: a qualitative study of the ‘look and feel’ of clinical trial discussions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-101.
    1. Ebbesen M, Pedersen B. Using empirical research to formulate normative ethical principles in biomedicine. Med Health Care Philos. 2007;10(1):33–48. doi: 10.1007/s11019-006-9011-9.
    1. Jansen TC, Kompanje EJ, Bakker J. Deferred proxy consent in emergency criticial care research: Ethically valid and practically feasible. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(1):S65–68.
    1. Meert KL, Eggly S, Dean JM, Pollack M, Zimmerman J, Anand KJS, Newth CJL, Willson DF, Nicholson C. Ethical and logistical considerations of multicenter parental bereavement research. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(3):444–450. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0120.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe