Assessing the effect of an educational intervention on early childhood development among Mexican preschool children in the state of Oaxaca: a study protocol of a cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial

Amado D Quezada-Sánchez, Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera, Angélica García-Martínez, María Del Carmen Hernández-Chávez, Carlos Pineda-Antúnez, Martín Romero Martínez, Armando García-Guerra, Raquel García-Feregrino, Abby Madrigal-Ramírez, Tania Santiago-Angelino, Fabián Olvera-Flores, Lourdes Schnaas, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla, Edson Serván-Mori, Amado D Quezada-Sánchez, Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera, Angélica García-Martínez, María Del Carmen Hernández-Chávez, Carlos Pineda-Antúnez, Martín Romero Martínez, Armando García-Guerra, Raquel García-Feregrino, Abby Madrigal-Ramírez, Tania Santiago-Angelino, Fabián Olvera-Flores, Lourdes Schnaas, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla, Edson Serván-Mori

Abstract

Background: Early childhood development (ECD) is essential in human capacity building and a critical element in the intergenerational process of human development. In some countries, social programs targeted at improving ECD have proven to be successful. Oaxaca is one of the States with the greatest social inequities in Mexico. Therefore, children in Oaxaca are at a high risk of suboptimal ECD. In 2014, the non-governmental organization (NGO) Un Kilo de Ayuda started to implement the Neurological and Psycho-affective Early Childhood Development Program in eighty marginalized communities of Oaxaca. In this article, we present the impact evaluation design to estimate the effect of this program on ECD.

Methods: We will use a cluster randomized stepped-wedge design with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Communities will be randomly assigned to each study group: four groups of twenty communities each. We expect that children from intervened communities will show better ECD outcomes.

Discussion: This study is one of the few rigorous assessments of the effect of an ECD program on the neurodevelopment of Mexican children recruited in their first 3 years of life from communities of high social vulnerability. Our study design is recommended when the way in which outcomes are measured and assessed depends on age, self-selection is present, and assignment is performed at an aggregate level. Implementation research will be conducted prior to study launch and quality control measures will be in place to maximize the fidelity of study design implementation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04210362.

Keywords: Early childhood development; Impact evaluation; Mexico; NGO; Social vulnerability; Stepped-wedge design.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Simplified cluster randomized stepped-wedge and a quasi-experimental design

References

    1. Young ME. In: From early child development to human development: investing in our children’s future. 1. Young ME, editor. Washington D.C.: World Bank; 2002.
    1. Baker-Henningham H, López BF. Intervenciones de estimulación infantil temprana en los países en vías de desarrollo: Lo que funciona, por qué y para quién. Washington D.C: (Notas Técnicas). Report No.: IDB-TN-540; 2013.
    1. Black MM, Walker SP, Fernald LCH, Andersen CT, DiGirolamo AM, Lu C, et al. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):77–90.
    1. National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. The science of early childhood development closing the gap between what we know and what we do, vol. 02138. Cambridge, MA; 2007.
    1. Berlinski S, Schady N, editors. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). The early years child well-being and the role of public policy. 1. New York, NY 10004-1562: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. pp. 1–289.
    1. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). For every child, a fair chance: the promise of equity. New York, NY 10017, USA; 2015.
    1. Britto PR, Lye SJ, Proulx K, Yousafzai AK, Matthews SG, Vaivada T, et al. Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):91–102.
    1. Pérez-Escamilla R, Rizzoli-Córdoba A, Alonso-Cuevas A, Reyes-Morales H. Avances en el desarrollo infantil temprano: desde neuronas hasta programas a gran escala. Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México. 2017;74(2):86–97.
    1. Hartinger SM, Lanata CF, Hattendorf J, Wolf J, Gil AI, Obando MO, et al. Impact of a child stimulation intervention on early child development in rural Peru: a cluster randomised trial using a reciprocal control design. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2017;71(3):217–224.
    1. Cavero-Arguedas D, Cruzado de la Vega V, Cuadra-Carrasco G. Los efectos de los programas sociales en la salud de la población en condición de pobreza: evidencias a partir de las evaluaciones de impacto del presupuesto por resultados a programas sociales en Perú. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica. 2017;34(3):528–537.
    1. Richter LM, Daelmans B, Lombardi J, Heymann J, Boo FL, Behrman JR, et al. Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):103–118.
    1. Reyes ME, Chavez GB, Little BB, Malina RM. Community well-being and growth status of indigenous school children in rural Oaxaca, southern Mexico. Econ Hum Biol. 2010;8(2):177–187.
    1. Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL) Entidades federativas: Oaxaca [Internet]. Información de pobreza y evaluación de las entidades federativas y municipios. 2021.
    1. Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO) Indicadores demográficos de México de 1950 a 2050. 2021.
    1. Pell LG, Bassani DG, Nyaga L, Njagi I, Wanjiku C, Thiruchselvam T, et al. Effect of provision of an integrated neonatal survival kit and early cognitive stimulation package by community health workers on developmental outcomes of infants in Kwale County, Kenya: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(265):1–11.
    1. Attanasio OP, Fernandez C, Fitzsimons EO, Grantham-McGregor SM, Meghir C, Rubio-Codina M. Using the infrastructure of a conditional cash transfer program to deliver a scalable integrated early child development program in Colombia: cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2014;349(g5785):1–12.
    1. Fernald LC, Galasso E, Qamruddin J, Ranaivoson C, Ratsifandrihamanana L, Stewart CP, et al. A cluster-randomized, controlled trial of nutritional supplementation and promotion of responsive parenting in Madagascar: the MAHAY study design and rationale. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(466):1–14.
    1. Fernandez-Rao S, Hurley KM, Nair KM, Balakrishna N, Radhakrishna KV, Ravinder P, et al. Integrating nutrition and early child-development interventions among infants and preschoolers in rural India. Ann New York Acad Sciencesi. 2014;1308:218–231.
    1. Black MM, Behrman JR, Daelmans B, Prado EL, Richter L, Tomlinson M, et al. The principles of Nurturing Care promote human capital and mitigate adversities from preconception through adolescence. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6(4):e004436.
    1. Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2015;350(h391):1–7.
    1. Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO) Índices de marginación 1990-2010 [Internet]. Ciudad de México. 2012.
    1. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI) Principales resultados por localidad (ITER) [Internet]. Censo de población y vivienda. 2010.
    1. Guo S, Fraser MW. Propensity score analysis: statistical methods and applications. 2. Washington DC, USA: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2015. pp. 1–421.
    1. México DF. Comisión Nacional de Protección Social en Salud (CNPSS). Manual para la Aplicación de la Prueba Evaluación del Desarrollo Infantil EDI. 2013.
    1. Comisión Nacional de Protección Social en Salud (CNPSS). Complementario para la aplicación de la prueba evaluación del desarrollo infantil EDI. México D.F. 2013.
    1. Lohman T, Roche A, Martorell R, Anthropometric standarization reference manual . In: Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics. 1. Lohmann TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. 1988. pp. 1–177.
    1. Habicht J. Standardization of anthropometric methods in the field. PAHO Bull. 1974;76(5):375–384.
    1. Status WEC, on P. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Geneva: WHO technical report series 845; 1995.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age. In: methods and development. Geneva 27, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006.
    1. McCarthy D. Manual for the McCarthy scales of children’s abilities. 1. New York, NY 10017, USA: Psychological Corporation; 1972. pp. 1–209.
    1. Lohr SL. In: Sampling: design and analysis. Second. Brooks/Cole. Learning C, editor. Boston, MA 02210: Stratton, Richard; 2010. pp. 1689–1699.
    1. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.; 2017.
    1. Bayley N. In: Bayley scales of infant and toddler development: technical manual. 3. Goldstein S, Naglieri JA, editors. Boston, MA: Springer; 2006. pp. 1–163.
    1. McCarthy D. McCarthy scales of children abilities. 1st ed. The Psychological Corporation, editor. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1972.
    1. Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH. Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. 1. San Antonio, TX: Oxford Psychologists; 1997. pp. 1–116.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf. 2009;42(2):377–381.
    1. Graubard B, Korn E. Predictive margins. Anal Health Surv Biom. 1999;55(2):652–659.
    1. Muthén LK, Muthén B. In: Mplus user’s guide: statistical analysis with latent variables. 8 Muthén LM, BO, editors. 2017.
    1. Little RJA, Rubin DB. In: Estimation of imputation uncertainty. Statistical analysis with missing data. 2. Sons I, editor. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley; 2002. pp. 75–93.
    1. Donner A, Neil K. Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research. 1. New York: Wiley; 2010. p. 194.
    1. Copas AJ, Lewis JJ, Thompson JA, Davey C, Baio G, Hargreaves JR. Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches. Trials. 2015;16(352):1–12.
    1. Mason J, Deitchler M, Mathys E, Winichagoon P, Tuazon MA. Lessons from successful micronutrient programs Part III: program impact. Food Nutr Bull. 2004;25(1):53–78.
    1. Hovdenak N, Haram K. Influence of mineral and vitamin supplements on pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;164(2):127–132.
    1. Aboud FE, Akhter S. A cluster-randomized evaluation of a responsive stimulation and feeding intervention in Bangladesh. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):1191–1197.
    1. Vazir S, Engle P, Balakrishna N, Griffiths PL, Johnson SL, Creed-Kanashiro H, et al. Cluster-randomized trial on complementary and responsive feeding education to caregivers found improved dietary intake, growth and development among rural Indian toddlers. Matern Child Nutr. 2013;9(1):99–117.
    1. Ara G, Khanam M, Papri N, Nahar B, Kabir I, Sanin KI, et al. Peer counseling promotes appropriate infant feeding practices and improves infant growth and development in an urban slum in Bangladesh: a community-based cluster randomized controlled trial. Curr Dev Nutr. 2019;3(7):1–10.
    1. Sgandurra G, Lorentzen J, Inguaggiato E, Bartalena L, Beani E, Cecchi F, et al. A randomized clinical trial in preterm infants on the effects of a home-based early intervention with the “CareToy System.”. PLos ONE. 2017;12(3):e0173521.
    1. Rockers PC, Zanolini A, Banda B, Chipili MM, Hughes RC, Hamer DH, et al. Two-year impact of community-based health screening and parenting groups on child development in Zambia: follow-up to a cluster-randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2018;15(4):e1002555.
    1. Duncombe ME, Havighurst SS, Kehoe CE, Holland KA, Frankling EJ, Stargatt R. Comparing an emotion- and a behavior-focused parenting program as part of a multsystemic intervention for child conduct problems. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45(3):320–334.
    1. Bedard C, Bremer E, Campbell W, Cairney J. A quasi-experimental study of a movement and preliteracy program for 3- and 4-year-old children. Front Pediatr. 2017;5(94):1–6.
    1. Fernald LCH, Kagawa RMC, Knauer HA, Schnaas L, Guerra AG, Neufeld LM. Promoting child development through group-based parent support within a cash transfer program: experimental effects on children’s outcomes. Dev Psychol. 2017;53(2):222–236.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe