Effects of virtual reality erotica on ejaculate quality of sperm donors: a balanced and randomized controlled cross-over within-subjects trial

Daniel Rosenkjær, Allan Pacey, Robert Montgomerie, Anne-Bine Skytte, Daniel Rosenkjær, Allan Pacey, Robert Montgomerie, Anne-Bine Skytte

Abstract

Background: Previous research has shown that the type and duration of erotic material that men have access to during masturbation can influence semen parameters. To our knowledge, the use of virtual reality (VR) headsets to present erotica has not previously been studied. We reasoned that, because VR can provide a more immersive experience to the user, semen parameters of masturbatory ejaculates may be altered.

Methods: This study had a balanced and randomized controlled cross-over within-subjects design. 504 ejaculates were collected from 63 sperm donors at 4 locations in Denmark. During masturbation each donor was instructed to observe erotic material either on a touch screen monitor or using a VR headset. The order of each pair of within-subject treatments was randomized by the throw of a dice. Anonymized data were analysed with linear mixed and piecewise structural equation models.

Results: Both abstinence period and VR-use influenced the total number of motile spermatozoa ejaculated. For short abstinence periods, VR-use increased the number of motile sperm in the ejaculate. However, the difference between VR and non-VR ejaculates decreased as abstinence period increased such that there was no difference at the mean abstinence period of 58 h. For longer abstinence periods, total motile sperm counts were lower, on average, when men used VR compared to those that did not.

Conclusion: The use of VR headsets to view erotica had a strong positive effect on the number of motile sperm in an ejaculate when the donor's abstinence time was short (< 24 h). VR-use could improve the ejaculate quality of men who are asked to provide samples after a short period of abstinence, such as men in infertile partnerships producing samples for ART or cancer patients depositing sperm before treatment.

Trial registration: Trial retrospectively registered on 13 July 2022 at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05457764.

Keywords: Ejaculate quality; Erotic stimulation; Male fertility; Sperm donation; Virtual reality.

Conflict of interest statement

DR and ABS are at the time of writing employed at Cryos International. AP is the Chairman of the Cryos External Scientific Advisory Committee.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effect of abstinence period on total motile sperm count (TMSC), with and without using VR. (A) interaction plot from the full model (Table 1) with 95% confidence limits on each predicted regression. (B, C) Separate predicted regressions from models for donors with and without VR, with symbols showing the raw data. Note the log scales on all graphs
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of VR use on (A) the donation period and (B) ejaculate volume for each donor during each sperm donation (red, 252 donations in each category) and for the averages of all donations made by each donor (grey; 63 means in each category). Black symbols are means ± 95%CLs. Note the log scales on both graphs
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Path diagram from piecewise structural equation model showing the relative magnitude of effects; estimates on each arrow are standardized coefficients such that they are on the same scale and directly comparable. Green arrows are significant effects whereas grey arrows are not significant. The width of each arrow also indicates the magnitude of each effect. Arrows join variables that might plausibly influence one another and thus directly or indirectly have an effect on the total motile sperm count (TMSC).

References

    1. Jørgensen N, Andersen A-G, Eustache F, Irvine DS, Suominen J, Petersen JH, et al. Regional differences in semen quality in Europe. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1012–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.1012.
    1. Johnson SL, Dunleavy J, Gemmell NJ, Nakagawa S. Consistent age-dependent declines in human semen quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;19.
    1. Sermondade N, Faure C, Fezeu L, Shayeb AG, Bonde JP, Jensen TK, et al. BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:221–31. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms050.
    1. Cherry N, Moore H, McNamee R, Pacey A, Burgess G, Clyma J-A, et al. Occupation and male infertility: glycol ethers and other exposures. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65:708–14. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.035824.
    1. Chen Z, Godfrey-Bailey L, Schiff I, Hauser R. Impact of seasonal variation, age and smoking status on human semen parameters: The Massachusetts General Hospital experience. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2004;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1743-1050-1-2.
    1. Giblin PT, Poland ML, Moghissi KS, Ager JW, Olson JM. Effects of stress and characteristic adaptability on semen quality in healthy men. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:127–32. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59663-0.
    1. Carlsen E, Petersen JH, Andersson A-M, Skakkebaek NE. Effects of ejaculatory frequency and season on variations in semen quality. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:358–66. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.039.
    1. Francavilla F, Barbonetti A, Necozione S, Santucci R, Cordeschi G, Macerola B, et al. Within-subject variation of seminal parameters in men with infertile marriages. Int J Androl. 2007;30:174–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2006.00727.x.
    1. Hamilton JAM, Cissen M, Brandes M, Smeenk JMJ, de Bruin JP, Kremer JAM, et al. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1110–21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev058.
    1. Sofikitis N. Endocrinological, biophysical, and biochemical parameters of semen collected via masturbation versus sexual intercourse. J Androl. 1993;14:366–73. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1993.tb00402.x.
    1. Zavos PM, Goodpasture JC. Clinical improvements of specific seminal deficiencies via intercourse with a seminal collection device versus masturbation. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:190–3. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)60455-7.
    1. Zavos PM. Seminal parameters of ejaculates collected from oligospermic and normospermic patients via masturbation and at intercourse with the use of a Silastic seminal fluid collection device. Fertil Steril. 1985;44:517–20. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48923-5.
    1. Pound N, Javed MH, Ruberto C, Shaikh MA, del Valle AP. Duration of sexual arousal predicts semen parameters for masturbatory ejaculates. Physiol Behav. 2002;76:685–9. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00803-X.
    1. Fontanesi L, Renaud P. Sexual presence: Toward a model inspired by evolutionary psychology. New Ideas Psychol. 2014;33:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.10.001.
    1. Furht B, editor. Immersive Virtual Reality. Encyclopedia of Multimedia [Internet]. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2008. p. 345–6. Available from: 10.1007/978-0-387-78414-4_85.
    1. Cummings JJ, Bailenson JN. How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence. Media Psychol. 2016;19:272–309. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740.
    1. Lafortune D, Dion L, Renaud P. Virtual Reality and Sex Therapy: Future Directions for Clinical Research. J Sex Marital Ther. 2020;46:1–17. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2019.1623357.
    1. Bohil CJ, Alicea B, Biocca FA. Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:752–62. doi: 10.1038/nrn3122.
    1. Ferraz-Torres M, San Martín-Rodríguez L, García-Vivar C, Soto-Ruiz N, Escalada-Hernández P. “Passive or interactive virtual reality? The effectiveness for pain and anxiety reduction in pediatric patients.” Virtual Real. 2022.
    1. Gesselman AN, Kaufman EM, Marcotte AS, Reynolds TA, Garcia JR. Engagement with Emerging Forms of Sextech: Demographic Correlates from a National Sample of Adults in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research. 2022;1–13.
    1. Milani S, Jabs F, Brown NB, Zdaniuk B, Kingstone A, Brotto LA. Virtual Reality Erotica: Exploring General Presence, Sexual Presence, Sexual Arousal, and Sexual Desire in Women. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51:565–76. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02111-8.
    1. Elsey JWB, van Andel K, Kater RB, Reints IM, Spiering M. The impact of virtual reality versus 2D pornography on sexual arousal and presence. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;97:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.031.
    1. Dekker A, Wenzlaff F, Biedermann S, Briken P, Fuss J. VR Porn as “Empathy Machine”? Perception of Self and Others in Virtual Reality Pornography. J Sex Res. 2021;58:273–8. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1856316.
    1. Pellestor F, Girardet A, Andreo B. Effect of long abstinence periods on human sperm quality. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud [Internet]. 1994;39:278–282. Available from: .
    1. de Jonge C, LaFromboise M, Bosmans E, Ombelet W, Cox A, Nijs M. Influence of the abstinence period on human sperm quality. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.014.
    1. Okada FK, Andretta RR, Spaine DM. One day is better than four days of ejaculatory abstinence for sperm function. Reprod Fertility. 2020;1:1–10. doi: 10.1530/RAF-20-0018.
    1. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Weiss N, Friger M, Har-Vardi I, Koifman A, et al. Relationship between the duration of sexual abstinence and semen quality: analysis of 9,489 semen samples. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1680–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.045.
    1. Shipley B. Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User’s Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations and Causal Inference. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
    1. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [Internet]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 20]. Available from: .
    1. Hanson BM, Aston KI, Jenkins TG, Carrell DT, Hotaling JM. The impact of ejaculatory abstinence on semen analysis parameters: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:213–20. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1086-0.
    1. Magnus Ø, Tollefsrud A, Árbyholm T, Purvis K. Effects of Varying the Abstinence Period in the same Individuals on Sperm Quality. Arch Androl. 1991;26:199–203. doi: 10.3109/01485019108987644.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe