Leg ulcer nursing care in the community: a prospective cohort study of the symptom of pain

Elizabeth G Vandenkerkhof, Wilma M Hopman, Meg E Carley, Janet L Kuhnke, Margaret B Harrison, Elizabeth G Vandenkerkhof, Wilma M Hopman, Meg E Carley, Janet L Kuhnke, Margaret B Harrison

Abstract

Background: Chronic wounds are managed almost entirely by community nurses. Almost all individuals with leg ulcers report acute pain usually related to dressing change. Little is known about pain after healing. The purpose of this study was to explore the course of pain from baseline to time of healing of leg ulcers (venous or mixed etiology). In order to understand this phenomenon and develop implications for nursing practice, objectives included: 1) Measure incidence and prevalence of pain at baseline and healing; 2) Describe characteristics associated with leg ulcer pain at baseline; 3) Identify predictors of leg ulcer pain at healing.

Methods: Data were from one randomized controlled trial (2004-2008) of 424 individuals with leg ulcers in the community receiving evidence-informed nursing management. The primary outcome was pain at the time of healing. Predictive factors included demographic, circumstance of living, clinical and ulcer characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression identified the subset of predictors of pain at healing. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported.

Results: Eighty-two percent of participants reported pain at baseline and 32% at healing. Five percent with no pain at baseline reported pain at healing. Thirty-seven percent reported moderate to severe pain at baseline and 11% at healing. Twenty percent of all those who healed reported pain interfered with work moderately to extremely at time of healing. Being female (OR=1.64, 95% CI 1.00, 2.68, p=0.05), use of short-stretch vs. four-layer bandages (OR=1.73, 95% CI 1.06, 2.82, p=0.03), lower SF-12 PCS (OR=0.97, 95% CI 0.94, 0.99, p=0.02) and MCS (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, p=0.04) scores, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR=2.28, 95% CI 1.06, 4.88, p=0.03), and tender pain (OR=2.17, 95% CI 1.29, 3.66, p=<0.01) were associated with pain at time of healing.

Conclusions: Pain is an issue on admission for chronic wounds and at healing, yet 58% with moderate to severe pain on admission were not taking pain medication(s). Future studies should examine the role of pain at healing and at subsequent ulcer recurrence. Mobility and other factors that may contribute to pain at time of healing should also be assessed. Community nurses are encouraged to consider pain when planning care on admission and also after wound healing, when most patients are discharged from care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00202267.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment and data collection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Baseline pain descriptor frequencies for the participants who reported pain at baseline and for the participants who reported pain at healing.

References

    1. VanDenKerkhof EG, Hopman WM, Towheed TE, Anastassiades TP, Goldstein DH. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group. The impact of sampling and measurement on the prevalence of self-reported pain in Canada. Pain Res Manag. 2003;8:157–163.
    1. Tripp DA, VanDenKerkhof EG, McAlister M. Prevalence and determinants of pain and pain-related disability in urban and rural settings in southeastern Ontario. Pain Res Manag. 2006;11:225–233.
    1. Moulin DE, Clark AJ, Speechley M, Morley-Forster PK. Chronic pain in Canada–prevalence, treatment, impact and the role of opioid analgesia. Pain Res Manag. 2002;7:179–184.
    1. Reitsma ML, Tranmer JE, Buchanan DM, VanDenKerkhof EG. The prevalence of chronic pain and pain-related interference in the Canadian population from 1994 to 2008. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2011;31:157–164.
    1. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research (Report Brief) 2011.
    1. Peng P, Choiniere M, Dion D, Intrater H, LeFort S, Lynch M, Ong M, Rashiq S, Tkachuk G, Veillette Y. Challenges in accessing multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities in Canada. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:977–984. doi: 10.1007/BF03016631.
    1. Choiniere M, Dion D, Peng P, Banner R, Barton PM, Boulanger A, Clark AJ, Gordon AS, Guerriere DN, Guertin MC. The Canadian STOP-PAIN project - Part 1: Who are the patients on the waitlists of multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities? Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:539–548. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9305-5.
    1. Guerriere DN, Choiniere M, Dion D, Peng P, Stafford-Coyte E, Zagorski B, Banner R, Barton PM, Boulanger A, Clark AJ. The Canadian STOP-PAIN project - Part 2: What is the cost of pain for patients on waitlists of multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities? Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:549–558. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9306-4.
    1. Gilron I, Johnson AP. Economics of chronic pain: How can science guide health policy? Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:530–538. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9307-3.
    1. Macrae WA, Davies HT. In: Epidemiology of Pain . Crombie IK, Croft PR, Linton SJ, SeResche L, Von Korff M, editor. Seattle: IASP Press; 1999. Chronic postsurgical pain; pp. 125–142.
    1. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006;367:1618–1625. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.
    1. Macrae WA. Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:77–86. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen099.
    1. VanDenKerkhof EG, Hopman WM, Goldstein DH, Wilson RA, Towheed TE, Lam M, Harrison MB, Reitsma ML, Johnston SL, Medd JD. Impact of perioperative pain intensity, pain qualities, and opioid use on chronic pain after surgery: a prospective cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:19–27. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318237516e.
    1. VanDenKerkhof EG, Hopman WM, Reitsma ML, Goldstein DH, Wilson RA, Belliveau P, Gilron I. Chronic pain, healthcare utilization, and quality of life following gastrointestinal surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:670–680. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9712-x.
    1. Nemeth KA, Graham ID, Harrison MB. The measurement of leg ulcer pain: Identification and appraisal of pain assessment tools. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003;16:260–267. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200309000-00017.
    1. Nemeth KA, Harrison MB, Graham ID, Burke S. Pain in pure and mixed aetiology venous leg ulcers: a three-phase point prevalence study. J Wound Care. 2003;12:336–340.
    1. Nemeth KA, Harrison MB, Graham ID, Burke S. Understanding venous leg ulcer pain: results of a longitudinal study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004;50:34–46.
    1. Hofman D, Ryan TJ, Arnold F, Cherry GW, Lindholm C, Bjellerup M, Glynn C. Pain in venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care. 1997;6:222–224.
    1. Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ, Hollinworth H. An international perspective on wound pain and trauma. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003;49:12–14.
    1. Flaherty E. The views of patients living with healed venous leg ulcers. Nurs Stand. 2005;19:78, 80, 82–78, 80, 83.
    1. Woo KY, Sibbald RG. The improvement of wound-associated pain and healing trajectory with a comprehensive foot and leg ulcer care model. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009;36:184–191. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000347660.87346.ed.
    1. Callam MJ, Ruckley CV, Harper DR, Dale JJ. Chronic ulceration of the leg: extent of the problem and provision of care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985;290:1855–1856. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6485.1855.
    1. Lees TA, Lambert D. Prevalence of lower limb ulceration in an urban health district. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1032–1034. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800791015.
    1. Nelzen O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A, Hallbook T. Chronic leg ulcers: an underestimated problem in primary health care among elderly patients. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991;45:184–187. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.3.184.
    1. Simon DA, McCollum CN. Approaches to venous leg ulcer care within the community: compression, pinch skin grafts and simple venous surgery. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1996;42:34–38. 40.
    1. Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ, Oldroyd M, Bosanquet N, Brown P, Greenhalgh RM, McCollum CN. Community clinics for leg ulcers and impact on healing. BMJ. 1992;305:1389–1392. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6866.1389.
    1. Simon DA, Freak L, Kinsella A, Walsh J, Lane C, Groarke L, McCollum C. Community leg ulcer clinics: a comparative study in two health authorities. BMJ. 1996;312:1648–1651. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1648.
    1. Ruckley CV. Socioeconomic impact of chronic venous insufficiency and leg ulcers. Angiology. 1997;48:67–69. doi: 10.1177/000331979704800111.
    1. Harrison MB, VanDenKerkhof EG, Hopman WM, Graham ID, Carley ME, Nelson EA. and the Canadian Bandaging Trial Group (CBTG) The Canadian Bandaging Trial: Evidence-informed leg ulcer care and the effectiveness of two compression technologies. BMC Nurs. 2011;10:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-10-20.
    1. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1:277–299. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5.
    1. Melzack R, Katz J. The McGill pain questionnaire: Appraisal and current status. Handbook of Pain Assessment . 1992. pp. 152–168.
    1. Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30:191–197. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8.
    1. Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) Nursing Best Practice Guideline: Assessment and Management of Venous Leg Ulcers . Toronto, Ontario: Registered Nurses Association of Ontario; 2004.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and mental health summary scales: A user manual and interpretation guide . Boston, Massachusetts: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994.
    1. Hopman WM, Harrison MB, Carley M, VanDenKerkhof E. Additional support for simple imputation of missing quality of life data in nursing research. ISRN Nursing. 2011;2011(752320):4.
    1. Perneger TV, Burnand B. A simple imputation algorithm reduced missing data in SF-12 health surveys. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.005.
    1. Harrison MB, Graham ID, Friedberg E, Lorimer K, Vandevelde-Coke S. Regional planning study. Assessing the population with leg and foot ulcers. Can Nurse. 2001;97:18–23.
    1. Patel NP, Labropoulos N, Pappas PJ. Current management of venous ulceration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:254S–260S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000222531.84704.94.
    1. Jackson M. Pain: The Fifth Vital Sign . Toronto: Random House; 2002.
    1. National Pharmaceutical Council. Pain: Current understanding of assessment, management and treatments. In: Berry PH, Chapman CR, Covington EC, Dahl JL, Katz JA, Miaskowski C, McLean MJ, editor. National Pharmaceutical Council and the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. 2001. . Last access Feb. 8, 2013.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe