A validation study of the CEMACH recommended modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS)

S Singh, A McGlennan, A England, R Simons, S Singh, A McGlennan, A England, R Simons

Abstract

The 2003-2005 Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health report recommended the introduction of the modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) in all obstetric inpatients to track maternal physiological parameters, and to aid early recognition and treatment of the acutely unwell parturient. We prospectively reviewed 676 consecutive obstetric admissions, looking at their completed MEOWS charts for triggers and their notes for evidence of morbidity. Two hundred patients (30%) triggered and 86 patients (13%) had morbidity according to our criteria, including haemorrhage (43%), hypertensive disease of pregnancy (31%) and suspected infection (20%). The MEOWS was 89% sensitive (95% CI 81-95%), 79% specific (95% CI 76-82%), with a positive predictive value 39% (95% CI 32-46%) and a negative predictive value of 98% (95% CI 96-99%). There were no admissions to the intensive care unit, cardio respiratory arrests or deaths during the study period. This study suggests that MEOWS is a useful bedside tool for predicting morbidity. Adjustment of the trigger parameters may improve positive predictive value.

Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

References

    1. Goldhill D R, White S A, Sumner A. Physiological values and procedures in the 24 h before ICU admission from the ward. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 529-34.
    1. Cullinane M, Findlay G, Hargraves C, Lucas S. An Acute Problem?. London: National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death, 2005.
    1. Goldhill D R, McNarry A F, Mandersloot G, McGinley A. A physiologically-based early warning score for ward patients: the association between score and outcome. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 547-53.
    1. Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, et al. Harvey Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at risk patients on the ward. Intensive Care Medicine 2007; 33: 667-79.
    1. Lewis G (ed.) Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing maternal Deaths to make Motherhood Safer 2003-2005. The Seventh Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH, 2007.
    1. Harrison DA, Penny JA, Yentis SM, et al. Case mix, outcome and activity for obstetric admissions to adult, general Critical Care units: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database. Critical Care 2005; 9 (Suppl 3): S25-S37.
    1. Swanton RDJ, Al-Rawi S, Wee MYK. A national survey of obstetric early warning systems in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2009; 18: 253-7.
    1. Brace V, Penney G, Hall M. Quantifying severe maternal morbidity: a Scottish population study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2004; 111: 481-4.
    1. Grady K, Howell C, Cox C. Managing Obstetric Emergencies & Trauma- The MOET Course Manual, 2nd edn. London: RCOG Press, 2007.
    1. Tuffnell DJ, Shennan AH, Waugh JJS, Walker JJ. The Management of Severe Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia, Guideline 10(A). London: RCOG Press, 2006.
    1. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN Surveillance definition of health care associated infection and criteria for specific types of infection in the acute care setting. American Journal of Infection Control 2008; 36: 309-32.
    1. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group. British thoracic society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 2003; 58: 470-84.
    1. Hope RA, Longmore JM, Hodgetts TJ, Ramrakha PS. Oxford Handbook of Clinical Medicine, 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe