An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist

Mark S Bauer, Laura Damschroder, Hildi Hagedorn, Jeffrey Smith, Amy M Kilbourne, Mark S Bauer, Laura Damschroder, Hildi Hagedorn, Jeffrey Smith, Amy M Kilbourne

Abstract

Background: The movement of evidence-based practices (EBPs) into routine clinical usage is not spontaneous, but requires focused efforts. The field of implementation science has developed to facilitate the spread of EBPs, including both psychosocial and medical interventions for mental and physical health concerns.

Discussion: The authors aim to introduce implementation science principles to non-specialist investigators, administrators, and policymakers seeking to become familiar with this emerging field. This introduction is based on published literature and the authors' experience as researchers in the field, as well as extensive service as implementation science grant reviewers. Implementation science is "the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of research findings and other EBPs into routine practice, and, hence, to improve the quality and effectiveness of health services." Implementation science is distinct from, but shares characteristics with, both quality improvement and dissemination methods. Implementation studies can be either assess naturalistic variability or measure change in response to planned intervention. Implementation studies typically employ mixed quantitative-qualitative designs, identifying factors that impact uptake across multiple levels, including patient, provider, clinic, facility, organization, and often the broader community and policy environment. Accordingly, implementation science requires a solid grounding in theory and the involvement of trans-disciplinary research teams. The business case for implementation science is clear: As healthcare systems work under increasingly dynamic and resource-constrained conditions, evidence-based strategies are essential in order to ensure that research investments maximize healthcare value and improve public health. Implementation science plays a critical role in supporting these efforts.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Model of a Hypothesized Pathway of Change

References

    1. Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. Schattauer: Stuttgart; 2000. pp. 65–70.
    1. Grant J, Green L, Mason B. Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science. Res Eval. 2003;12:217–224. doi: 10.3152/147154403781776618.
    1. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J Roy Soc Med. 2011;104:510–20. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180.
    1. Moses H, 3rd, Matheson DH, Cairns-Smith S, George BP, Palisch C, Dorsey ER. The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons. JAMA. 2015;313(2):174–89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15939.
    1. Alberts B, Kirschner MW, Tilghman S, Varmus H. Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(16):5773–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404402111.
    1. US Institute of Medicine . Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington: National Academy Press; 1985.
    1. Wells KB. Treatment Research at the Crossroads: The Scientific Interface of Clinical Trials and Effectiveness Research. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:5–10. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.1.5.
    1. Bauer MS, Williford W, Dawson E, Akiskal H, Altshuler L, Fye C, et al. Principles of effectiveness trials and their implementation in VA Cooperative Study #430, “Reducing the Efficacy-Effectiveness Gap in Bipolar Disorder.”. J Affect Disord. 2001;67:61–78.
    1. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, Altman DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, et al. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 2008;337:a2390.
    1. March JS, Silva SG, Compton S, Shapiro M, Califf R, Krishnan R. The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(5):836–846. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.836.
    1. Yusuf S, Collins R, Peto R. Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials? Stat Med. 2006;3:409–20. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780030421.
    1. Rogers EJ. Diffusion of Innovations. 5. New York: Free Press; 2003.
    1. USVA QUERI (US Department of Veterans Affairs; Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, QUERI). . Last accessed June 1, 2015.
    1. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008;299:211–13.
    1. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. ImplementationSci. 2006;1:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1.
    1. Mason SE, Nicolay CR, Darzi A. The use of Lean and Six Sigma methodologies in surgery: A systematic review. Surgeon. 2015;13(2):91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.08.002.
    1. D'Andreamatteo A, Ianni L, Lega F, Sargiacomo M. Lean in healthcare: A comprehensive review. Health Policy. 2015; epub ahead of print.
    1. Health Services Research Information Central, US National Institutes of Health. . Last accessed April 27, 2015.
    1. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:759–769. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759.
    1. Shields MC, Patel PH, Manning M, Sacks L. A model for integrating independent physicians into accountable care organizations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30(1):161–172. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0824.
    1. US National Institutes of Health. & . Last accessed June 1, 2015.
    1. US National Cancer Institute. . Last accessed March 28, 2015.
    1. Canadian Institute of Health Research. . Last accessed March 28, 2015.
    1. Demakis JG, McQueen L, Kizer KW, Feussner JR. Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI): A collaboration between research and clinical practice. Med Care. 2000;38:I17–25. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200006001-00003.
    1. Bridgeland J, Orszag P. Can the government play Moneyball? The Atlantic Monthly, July/August. 2013.
    1. Allen H, Baicker K, Taubman S, Wright B, Finkelstein A. The Oregon health insurance experiment: when limited policy resources provide research opportunities. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013;38:1183–92. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2373244.
    1. Kilbourne AM, Goodrich DE, Lai Z, Almirall D, Nord KM, Bowersox NW, et al. Reengaging veterans with serious mental illness into care: preliminary results from a national randomized trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66:90–3.
    1. Kirchner E, Ritchie M, Pitcock A, Parker LE, Curran GM, Fortney JC. Outcomes of a partnered facilitation strategy to implement primary care-mental health. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(suppl 4):S904–12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3027-2.
    1. Waxmonsky J, Kilbourne AM, Goodrich DE, Nord KM, Lai Z, Laird C, et al. Enhanced fidelity to treatment for bipolar disorder: results from a randomized controlled implementation trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65:81–90.
    1. Woltmann E, Grogan-Kaylor A, Perron B, Georges H, Kilbourne AM, Bauer MS. Comparative effectiveness of collaborative chronic care models for mental health conditions across primary, specialty, and behavioral health settings. systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169:790–804. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11111616.
    1. Stetler CB, Legro MW, Wallace CM, Bowman C, Guihan M, Hagedorn H, et al. The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21 Suppl 2:S1–8.
    1. Kilbourne AM, Almirall D, Eisenberg D, Waxmonsky J, Goodrich DE, Fortney JC, et al. Protocol: Adaptive Implementation of Effective Programs Trial (ADEPT): cluster randomized SMART trial comparing a standard versus enhanced implementation strategy to improve outcomes of a mood disorders program. Implement Sci. 2014;9:132.
    1. Almirall D, Compton SN, Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Duan N, Murphy SA. Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy. Stat Med. 2012;31:1887–1902. doi: 10.1002/sim.4512.
    1. Smith MW, Barnett PG. The role of economics in the QUERI program: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008;3:20. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-20.
    1. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
    1. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. 3 approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
    1. Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Clegg Smith K. Research NIH OBSS. Bethesda: National Institute of Health; 2011. Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences.
    1. Conklin J. Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. England, Wiley: West Sussex; 2005.
    1. Plsek P. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001. Redesigning health care with insights from the science of complex adaptive systems; pp. 309–322.
    1. Damschroder LJ, Hagedorn HJ. A guiding framework and approach for implementation research in substance use disorders treatment Psychology of addictive behaviors. J Soc Psychol Addic Behav. 2011;25(2):194–205. doi: 10.1037/a0022284.
    1. Foy R, Ovretveit J, Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Taylor SL, Dy S, et al. The role of theory in research to develop and evaluate the implementation of patient safety practices. Qual Saf Health Care. 2011;20(5):453–9.
    1. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(3):228–38. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627.
    1. Damschroder L, Goodrich D, Robinson C, Fletcher C, Lowery J. A systematic exploration of differences in contextual factors related to implementing the MOVE! weight management program in VA: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):248. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-248.
    1. Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) Implement Sci. 2013;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-51.
    1. Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3–4):462–80. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x.
    1. Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
    1. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):337–50. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024.
    1. Ilott I, Gerrish K, Booth A, Field B. Testing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research on health care innovations from South Yorkshire. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;19:915–924.
    1. Kane H, Lewis MA, Williams PA, Kahwati LC. Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand and quantify translation and implementation. Translational Behav Med. 2014;4(2):201–208. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6.
    1. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: A systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):22. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-22.
    1. Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR. The implementation leadership scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):45. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-45.
    1. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD000259.
    1. Leeman J, Baernholdt M, Sandelowski M. Developing a theory-based taxonomy of methods for implementing change in practice. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58(2):191–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04207.x.
    1. Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007.
    1. Parchman ML, Noel PH, Culler SD, Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, Romero RL, et al. A randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve the delivery of chronic illness care in primary care. Impl Sci. 2013;8:93.
    1. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. New York: Springer; 2009.
    1. Wagner A, Soumerai S, Zhang F, Ross‐Degnan D. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002;27(4):299–309. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00430.x.
    1. Loudeon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe K, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2147.
    1. Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb 3rd RL, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1310–9.
    1. Kilbourne AM, Goodrich DE, Nord KM, VanPoppelen C, Kyle J, Bauer MS, Waxmonsky JA, Lai Z, Kim HM, Eisenberg D, Thomas MR. Long-term clinical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of two implementation strategies to promote collaborative care attendance in community practices. Admin Policy Mental Health 2014. epub ahead of print.
    1. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Hearnshaw H, Flottorp S, Robertson N, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;3:CD005470.
    1. Chambers DA, Glasgow RE, Stange KC. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement Sci. 2013;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-117.
    1. Curran G, Bauer MS, Stetler CB, Mittman BS. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50:217–226. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
    1. US Department of Veterans Affairs. . Last accessed July 25, 2015.
    1. Hagedorn HJ, Noorbaloochi S, Baines Simon A, Bangerter A, Stitzer ML, Stetler CB, et al. Rewarding early abstinence in Veterans Health Administration addiction clinics. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013;45:109–17.
    1. Hagedorn HJ, Stetler CB, Bangerter A, Noorbaloochi S, Stitzer ML, Kivlahan D. An implementation-focused process evaluation of an incentive intervention effectiveness trial in substance use disorders clinics at two Veterans Health Administration medical centers. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2014;9:12. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-9-12.
    1. Gaglio B, Glasgow RE. Evaluation approaches for dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson R, Colditz G, Proctor E, editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science into Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 327–356.
    1. Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARIHS framework: Theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-1.
    1. Harvey G, Kitson A. Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare. Routledge: A Facilitation Guide; 2015.
    1. Azjen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
    1. US Institute of Medicine . The Learning Helathcare System: Workshop Summary. Washington: National Academy Press; 2007.
    1. US Institute of Medicine Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America . Best Care at Lower Cost. Washington: National Academy Press; 2013.
    1. Fihn SD, Francis J, Clancy C, Nielson C, Nelson K, Rumsfeld J, et al. Insights from advanced analytics at the Veterans Health Administration. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33:1203–11.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe