Physical activity assessment in practice: a mixed methods study of GPPAQ use in primary care

Neil Heron, Mark A Tully, Michelle C McKinley, Margaret E Cupples, Neil Heron, Mark A Tully, Michelle C McKinley, Margaret E Cupples

Abstract

Background: Insufficient physical activity (PA) levels which increase the risk of chronic disease are reported by almost two-thirds of the population. More evidence is needed about how PA promotion can be effectively implemented in general practice (GP), particularly in socio-economically disadvantaged communities. One tool recommended for the assessment of PA in GP and supported by NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) is The General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) but details of how it may be used and of its acceptability to practitioners and patients are limited. This study aims to examine aspects of GPPAQ administration in non-urgent patient contacts using different primary care electronic recording systems and to explore the views of health professionals regarding its use.

Methods: Four general practices, selected because of their location within socio-economically disadvantaged areas, were invited to administer GPPAQs to patients, aged 35-75 years, attending non-urgent consultations, over two-week periods. They used different methods of administration and different electronic medical record systems (EMIS, Premiere, Vision). Participants' (general practitioners (GPs), nurses and receptionists) views regarding GPPAQ use were explored via questionnaires and focus groups.

Results: Of 2,154 eligible consultations, 192 (8.9%) completed GPPAQs; of these 83 (43%) were categorised as inactive. All practices were located within areas ranked as being in the tertile of greatest socio-economic deprivation in Northern Ireland. GPs/nurses in two practices invited completion of the GPPAQ, receptionists did so in two. One practice used an electronic template; three used paper copies of the questionnaires.End-of-study questionnaires, completed by 11 GPs, 3 nurses and 2 receptionists and two focus groups, with GPs (n = 8) and nurses (n = 4) indicated that practitioners considered the GPPAQ easy to use but not in every consultation. Its use extended consultation time, particularly for patients with complex problems who could potentially benefit from PA promotion.

Conclusions: GPs and nurses reported that the GPPAQ itself was an easy tool with which to assess PA levels in general practice and feasible to use in a range of electronic record systems but integration within routine practice is constrained by time and complex consultations. Further exploration of ways to facilitate PA promotion into practice is needed.

References

    1. World Health Organisation (WHO) Global health observatory (GHO)- NCD mortality and morbidity. World Health Organisation. 2008.
    1. Lee I, Shiroma E, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair S, Katzmarzyk P. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380:219–229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9.
    1. Lim S, Vos T, Flaxman A, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H. et al.A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8.
    1. Fentem PH. ABC of sports medicine. benefits of exercise in health and disease. Br Med J. 1994;308(6939):1291–1295. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6939.1291.
    1. Miller T, Balady G, Fletcher G. Exercise and its role in the prevention and rehabilitation of cardiovascular disease. Ann Behav Med. 1997;19(3):220–229. doi: 10.1007/BF02892287.
    1. Oja P. Dose response between total volume of physical activity and health and fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6 Suppl):S428–S437.
    1. Let’s get moving - physical activity care pathway. Department of health - public health [Internet] 2010. cited 11/29/2010]. Available from: .
    1. Weiler R, Stamatakis E. Physical activity in the UK: A unique crossroad? British J Sports Med. 2010;44(13):912–914. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.073726.
    1. WHO | diet and physical activity. A public health priority [Internet] 2010. cited 11/29/2010]. Available from:
    1. Department of Health (c) Choosing health? choosing activity - A consultation on how to increase physical activity. 2004.
    1. Four commonly used methods to increase physical activity [Internet] 2006. cited 11/29/2010]. Available from: .
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Physical activity: Brief advice for adults in primary care. NICE Public Health Guidance. 2013;44
    1. Stevens W, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M, McArdle D. Cost-effectiveness of a primary care based physical activity intervention in 45-74 year old men and women: A randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 1998;32(3):236–241. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.32.3.236.
    1. Petrella RJ, Lattanzio CN, Overend TJ. Physical activity counseling and prescription among canadian primary care physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(16):1774–1781. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.16.1774.
    1. Douglas F, Torrance N, Teijlingen E, Meloni S, Kerr A. Primary care staff’s views and experiences related to routinely advising patients about physical activity. A questionnaire survey. BMC Public Health. 2006;23(6):138.
    1. Spanou C, Simpson S, Hood K, Edwards A, Cohen D, Rollnick S. et al.Preventing disease through opportunistic, rapid engagement by primary care teams using behaviour change counselling (PRE-EMPT): Protocol for a general practice-based cluster randomised trial. BMC Family Practice. 2010;21(11):69.
    1. Gidlow C, Johnston LH, Crone D, Ellis N, James D. A systematic review of the relationship between socio-economic position and physical activity. Health Educ J. 2006;65(4):338–367. doi: 10.1177/0017896906069378.
    1. Wanless D. Securing good health for the whole population - final report. 2004.
    1. Physical Activity Policy, Health Improvement Directorate. The general practice physical activity questionnaire (GPPAQ) - A screening tool to assess adult physical activity levels, within primary care. 2009.
    1. Wareham NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, Schuit J, Mitchell J, Hennings S. et al.Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6(4):407–413.
    1. NHS. The general practice physical activity questionnaire (GPPAQ) 2006.
    1. Bull F, Milton K, Boehler C. Report of the evaluation of the physical activity care pathway London feasibility pilot - final technical report. UK: British Heart Foundation (BHF) National Centre - Loughborough University; 2008.
    1. Bull F, Milton K. A process evaluation of a “physical activity pathway” in the primary care setting. BMC Public Health. 2010;9(10):463.
    1. Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (a) Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (a) 2010. .
    1. Pinto BM, Goldstein MG, Ashba J, Sciamanna CN, Jette A. Randomized controlled trial of physical activity counseling for older primary care patients. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(4):247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.016.
    1. Haines DJ, Davis L, Rancour P, Robinson M, Neel-Wilson T, Wagner S. A pilot intervention to promote walking and wellness and to improve the health of college faculty and staff. J Am Coll Health. 2007;55(4):219–225. doi: 10.3200/JACH.55.4.219-225.
    1. Lacey A, Luff D. Qualitative data analysis. Nat Ins Health R. 2009.
    1. At least five a week: Evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health: Department of health - publications [Internet] 2004. cited 11/29/2010]. Available from: .
    1. Trinh L, Wilson R, Williams H, Sum A, Naylor P. Physicians promoting physical activity using pedometers and community partnerships: A real world trial. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:284–290. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.069567.
    1. Rollnick S, Butler C, Stott N. Helping smokers make decisions: The enhancement of brief intervention for general medical practice. Patient Edu Couns. 1997;31(3):191–203. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(97)01004-5.
    1. van Sluijs E, van Poppel M, Stalman W, van Mechelen W. Feasibility and acceptability of a physical activity promotion programme in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004;21:429–436. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh414.
    1. Lobelo F, Duperly J, Frank E. Physical activity habits of doctors and medical students influence their counselling practices. Br J Sports Med online. 2009;43(2):89–92.
    1. Weiler R, Chew S, Coombs N, Hamer M, Stamatakis E. Physical activity education in the undergraduate curricula of all UK medical schools: Are tomorrow’s doctors equipped to follow clinical guidelines? Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(14):1024–1026. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091380.
    1. Dunlop M, Murray A. Major limitations in knowledge of physical activity guidelines among UK medical students revealed: Implications for the undergraduate medical curriculum. Br J Sports Med. 2013. Epub.
    1. Cooke P, Tully M, Cupples M, Gilliland A, Gormley G. A randomised control trial of experiential learning to promote physical activity. Educ Prim Care. 2013;24(6):427–435.
    1. Calvert M, Shankar A, McManus R, Lester H, Freemantle N. Effect of the quality and outcomes framework on diabetes care in the United Kingdom: Retrospective cohort study. Br Med J. 2009;338:b1870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1870.
    1. NHS. Quality and outcomes framework. Quality and outcomes framework website. 2013. .
    1. Morris J. Exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease: Today’s best buy in public health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26(7):807–814.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe