Insights from VERIFY: Early Combination Therapy Provides Better Glycaemic Durability Than a Stepwise Approach in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes

David Matthews, Stefano Del Prato, Viswanathan Mohan, Chantal Mathieu, Sergio Vencio, Juliana C N Chan, Michael Stumvoll, Päivi Maria Paldánius, David Matthews, Stefano Del Prato, Viswanathan Mohan, Chantal Mathieu, Sergio Vencio, Juliana C N Chan, Michael Stumvoll, Päivi Maria Paldánius

Abstract

The treatment aims for type 2 diabetes are to prevent complications and premature mortality, and improve quality of life. Glycaemic control is central to these aims; clinical guidelines have sought to achieve this with a stepwise approach starting with lifestyle measures and metformin, adding further medications once glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels rise above a predefined threshold. However, treatment intensification can be delayed when HbA1c levels increase, and HbA1c levels become inadequately controlled in many patients. Clinical inertia can result in sustained elevated levels of HbA1c; when combined with a late diagnosis, this negatively impacts patients' prognosis. Early combination therapy using medications with complementary modes of action could achieve optimal glycaemic targets and alter the course of the disease more than metformin alone. The multinational VERIFY study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01528254) provided evidence accrued over 5 years, demonstrating the potential of early combination therapy: time to loss of glycaemic control was nearly doubled, and more than twice the number of patients experienced extended glycaemic control, with a vildagliptin-metformin combination therapy versus metformin alone. The study also showed a delay in secondary treatment failure in patients receiving the combination. Early combination therapy therefore offers a different trajectory to the stepwise approach. Translating these findings into clinical practice will require early detection and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes plus a shift in disease management. Nonetheless, the potential benefits of sustained and continuous disease control that early combination therapy offers represent the start of a new era in early diagnosis and intensive management, to achieve the treatment aims of type 2 diabetes.

Keywords: Combination therapy; Glycaemic control; Type 2 diabetes; VERIFY; Vildagliptin.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An abbreviated overview of ADA and EASD recommendations over the last decade for stepwise therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. 1Nathan DM, et al. Diabetologia 2009;52:17–30 [4]. 2Inzucchi SE, et al. Diabetologia 2012;55:1577–96 [6]. 3Inzucchi SE, et al. Diabetologia 2015;58:429–42 [5]. 4Davies MJ, et al. Diabetologia 2018;61:2461–98 [1]. 5Buse JB, et al. Diabetologia 2020;63:221–8 [7]. *Well-validated core therapies. †GLP-1 receptor agonist not to be used with either a DPP4 inhibitor or an SGLT2 inhibitor. ADA American Diabetes Association, ASCVD atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, CKD chronic kidney disease, CVD cardiovascular disease, EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The VERIFY study design. Adapted from Del Prato S, et al. Diabet Med. 2014;31;1178–84 [16]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A 26% reduction in risk of time to secondary treatment failure following early combination therapy in the VERIFY study [14]; i.e. approx. 1 in 4 patients treated and initially experiencing failure with early combination treatment did not require addition of a third treatment (usually insulin), versus delayed combination therapy. *Defined as loss of glycaemic control: two consecutive values of HbA1c ≥ 53 mmol/mol (7.0%). †Defined by the need to maintain glycaemic control with a third treatment (usually insulin) in patients receiving combination therapy, according to local diabetes treatment guidelines and as per investigators discretion
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Early combination strategy and evolution of the patient journey from early diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Adapted from Reach G, et al. Diabetes Metab. 2017;43:501–11, Strain WD, et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;105:302–12 and Pantalone KM, et al. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1527–34 [–12]
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Guiding principles: the six most important actions for the physician in an early combination strategy

References

    1. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetologia. 2018;61:2461–2498. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5.
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998;352:854–65.
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837–53.
    1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Medical management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2009;52:17–30. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1157-y.
    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centred approach. Update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015;58:429–442. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3460-0.
    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetologia. 2012;55:1577–1596. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2534-0.
    1. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, et al. 2019 update to: management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetologia. 2020;63:221–228. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05039-w.
    1. Brown JB, Conner C, Nichols GA. Secondary failure of metformin monotherapy in clinical practice. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:501–506. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1749.
    1. DeFronzo RA, Eldor R, Abdul-Ghani M. Pathophysiologic approach to therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:S127–S138. doi: 10.2337/dcS13-2011.
    1. Pantalone KM, Wells BJ, Chagin KM, et al. Intensification of diabetes therapy and time until A1C goal attainment among patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes who fail metformin monotherapy within a large integrated health system. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1527–1534. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0227.
    1. Reach G, Pechtner V, Gentilella R, Corcos A, Ceriello A. Clinical inertia and its impact on treatment intensification in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. 2017;43:501–511. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.06.003.
    1. Strain WD, Cos X, Hirst M, et al. Time to do more: addressing clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;105:302–312. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.05.005.
    1. Cahn A, Cefalu WT. Clinical considerations for use of initial combination therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:S137–S145. doi: 10.2337/dcS15-3007.
    1. Matthews DR, Paldánius PM, Proot P, et al. Glycaemic durability of an early combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin versus sequential metformin monotherapy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (VERIFY): a 5-year, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2019;394:1519–1529. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32131-2.
    1. Mosenzon O, Leibowitz G. VERIFY the role of initial combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2019;394:1483–1485. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32165-8.
    1. Del Prato S, Foley JE, Kothny W, et al. Study to determine the durability of glycaemic control with early treatment with a vildagliptin-metformin combination regimen vs. standard-of-care metformin monotherapy—the VERIFY trial: a randomized double-blind trial. Diabet Med. 2014;31:1178–1184. doi: 10.1111/dme.12508.
    1. Forst T, Bramlage P. Vildagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor for the twice-daily treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without metformin. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15:1299–1313. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2014.920009.
    1. Bekiari E, Rizava C, Athanasiadou E, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of vildagliptin for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Endocrine. 2016;52:458–480. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0841-1.
    1. Mathieu C, Barnett AH, Brath H, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of second-line therapy with vildagliptin vs. other oral agents in type 2 diabetes: a real-life worldwide observational study (EDGE) Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:947–956. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12252.
    1. Ahren B, Foley JE, Bosi E. Clinical evidence and mechanistic basis for vildagliptin's action when added to metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13:193–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01321.x.
    1. He YL. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:147–162. doi: 10.2165/11598080-000000000-00000.
    1. Giannarelli R, Aragona M, Coppelli A, Del Prato S. Reducing insulin resistance with metformin: the evidence today. Diabetes Metab. 2003;29:6S28–35. doi: 10.1016/S1262-3636(03)72785-2.
    1. Mathieu C, Degrande E. Vildagliptin: a new oral treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4:1349–1360. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S3005.
    1. McCombie L, Leslie W, Taylor R, Kennon B, Sattar N, Lean MEJ. Beating type 2 diabetes into remission. BMJ. 2017;358:j4030. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4030.
    1. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1577–1589. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470.
    1. Laiteerapong N, Ham SA, Gao Y, et al. The legacy effect in type 2 diabetes: impact of early glycemic control on future complications (the Diabetes & Aging Study) Diabetes Care. 2019;42:416–426. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1144.
    1. Cersosimo E, Johnson EL, Chovanes C, Skolnik N. Initiating therapy in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: combination therapy vs a stepwise approach. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:497–507. doi: 10.1111/dom.13108.
    1. Hong D, Si L, Jiang M, et al. Cost effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors: a systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37:777–818. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00833-1.
    1. American Diabetes Association 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S98–110. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S009.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe