Cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary management of Tinnitus at a specialized Tinnitus centre

Rilana Cima, Manuela Joore, Iris Maes, Dyon Scheyen, Amr El Refaie, David M Baguley, Johan Ws Vlaeyen, Lucien Anteunis, Rilana Cima, Manuela Joore, Iris Maes, Dyon Scheyen, Amr El Refaie, David M Baguley, Johan Ws Vlaeyen, Lucien Anteunis

Abstract

Background: Tinnitus is a common chronic health condition that affects 10% to 20% of the general population. Among severe sufferers it causes disability in various areas. As a result of the tinnitus, quality of life is often impaired. At present there is no cure or uniformly effective treatment, leading to fragmentized and costly tinnitus care. Evidence suggests that a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach in treating tinnitus is effective. The main objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness, costs, and cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive treatment provided by a specialized tinnitus center versus usual care. This paper describes the study protocol.

Methods/design: In a randomized controlled clinical trial 198 tinnitus patients will be randomly assigned to a specialized tinnitus care group or a usual care group. Adult tinnitus sufferers referred to the audiological centre are eligible. Included patients will be followed for 12 months. Primary outcome measure is generic quality of life (measured with the Health Utilities Index Mark III). Secondary outcomes are severity of tinnitus, general distress, tinnitus cognitions, tinnitus specific fear, and costs. Based on health state utility outcome data the number of patients to include is 198. Economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective.

Discussion: This is, to our knowledge, the first randomized controlled trial that evaluates a comprehensive treatment of tinnitus and includes a full economic evaluation from a societal perspective. If this intervention proves to be effective and cost-effective, implementation of this intervention is considered and anticipated.

Trial registration: The trial has been registered at ClinicalTrial.gov. The trial registration number is NCT00733044.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart levels of care within randomized controlled clinical trial in Tinnitus Centre Limburg.

References

    1. Andersson G. Psychological aspects of tinnitus and the application of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002;22:977–90. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00124-6.
    1. A Davies, EA Rafie. Epidemiology of tinnitus. In: Tyler RS, editor. Tinnitus Handbook. San Diego: Singular; 2000.
    1. PF Adams, GE Hendershot, MA Marano. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1996. Vital Health Stat 10. 1999:1–203.
    1. NIPO, I.f.R.a.M Tinnitus: Public familiairity and subjective experience. DOH NIP, Editor Amsterdam. 2002.
    1. Scott B, et al. Predictors of tinnitus discomfort, adaptation and subjective loudness. Br J Audiol. 1990;24:51–62. doi: 10.3109/03005369009077842.
    1. PJ Jastreboff, WC Gray, SL Gold. Neurophysiological approach to tinnitus patients. Am J Otol. 1996;17:236–40.
    1. SI Erlandsson, LR Hallberg. Prediction of quality of life in patients with tinnitus. Br J Audiol. 2000;34:11–20.
    1. Kroner-Herwig B, et al. The management of chronic tinnitus: comparison of an outpatient cognitive-behavioral group training to minimal-contact interventions. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54:381–9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00400-2.
    1. El Refaie A, et al. A questionnaire study of the quality of life and quality of family life of individuals complaining of tinnitus pre- and post-attendance at a tinnitus clinic. Int J Audiol. 2004;43:410–6. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050052.
    1. Cacace AT. Expanding the biological basis of tinnitus: crossmodal origins and the role of neuroplasticity. Hear Res. 2003;175:112–32. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00717-7.
    1. N Ahmad, M Seidman. Tinnitus in the older adult: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment options. Drugs Aging. 2004;21:297–305. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421050-00002.
    1. AH Lockwood, RJ Salvi, RF Burkard. Tinnitus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:904–10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra013395.
    1. S Morley, C Eccleston, A Williams. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain. 1999;80:1–13.
    1. RL Folmer, SE Griest, WH Martin. Chronic tinnitus as phantom auditory pain. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;124:394–400. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2001.114673.
    1. McCombe A, et al. Guidelines for the grading of tinnitus severity: the results of a working group commissioned by the British Association of Otolaryngologists, Head and Neck Surgeons, 1999. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2001;26:388–93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2001.00490.x.
    1. Von Korff M. Pain management in primary care: an individualized stepped care approach. In: Gatchel R, Turk D, editor. Psychosocial factors in pain: evolution and revolutions. Guilford Press: New York; 1999.
    1. Lethem J, et al. Outline of a Fear-Avoidance Model of exaggerated pain perception–I. Behav Res Ther. 1983;21:401–8. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(83)90009-8.
    1. JW Vlaeyen, SJ Linton. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain. 2000;85:317–32. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00242-0.
    1. G Andersson, L Lyttkens. A meta-analytic review of psychological treatments for tinnitus. Br J Audiol. 1999;33:201–10. doi: 10.3109/03005369909090101.
    1. Horsman J, et al. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-54.
    1. Spinhoven P, et al. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997;27:363–70. doi: 10.1017/S0033291796004382.
    1. CW Newman, GP Jacobson, JB Spitzer. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:143–8.
    1. Roelofs J, et al. Fear of movement and (re)injury in chronic musculoskeletal pain: Evidence for an invariant two-factor model of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia across pain diagnoses and Dutch, Swedish, and Canadian samples. Pain. 2007;131:181–90. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.008.
    1. LM McCracken, C Zayfert, RT Gross. The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale: development and validation of a scale to measure fear of pain. Pain. 1992;50:67–73. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90113-P.
    1. Berg SGM Stomp-van den, et al. Pijn Coping en Cognitie Lijst. Meetinstrumenten chronische pijn. 2001;2
    1. MJL Sullivan, S Bishop, J Pivik. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychological Assessment. 1995;7:524–532. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524.
    1. Koopmanschap MA. PRODISQ: a modular questionnaire on productivity and disease for economic evaluation studies. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 2005;5:23–28. doi: 10.1586/14737167.5.1.23.
    1. Oostenbrink JB, et al. Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek, methoden en standaard kostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg. College voor zorgverzekeringen. 2004.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe