Scoring model of convex probe endobronchial ultrasound multimodal imaging in differentiating benign and malignant lung lesions

Xinxin Zhi, Lei Wang, Junxiang Chen, Xiaoxuan Zheng, Ying Li, Jiayuan Sun, Xinxin Zhi, Lei Wang, Junxiang Chen, Xiaoxuan Zheng, Ying Li, Jiayuan Sun

Abstract

Background: Convex probe endobronchial ultrasound images can reflect the morphology, blood flow status and stiffness of the lesions. Endobronchial ultrasound multimodal imaging has great value for the diagnosis of intrathoracic lymph nodes. This study aimed to analyze the application of endobronchial ultrasound multimodal imaging on lung lesions.

Methods: Patients undergoing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in Shanghai Chest Hospital from July 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Nine grayscale features (long and short axes, margin, shape, lobulation sign, echogenicity, necrosis, liquefaction, calcification, and air-bronchogram), blood flow volume and elastography five-score method were analyzed to explore the best diagnostic method. The gold standard for diagnosing lesions depends on the histological and cytopathological findings of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, transthoracic biopsy, resected sample of lesions, microbiological examination or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months.

Results: Endobronchial ultrasound multimodal imaging of 97 malignant lung lesions and 19 benign lung lesions from 116 patients were analyzed. There were statistically significant differences in distinct margin, presence of lobulation sign, presence of necrosis, and elastography grading score 4-5 between malignant and benign lung lesions, among which presence of lobulation sign and elastography grading score 4-5 were independent predictors. A diagnostic scoring model was then constructed based on the above four features, and when two or more features were present, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for malignant lung lesions prediction were 92.78%, 57.89%, 91.84%, 61.11% and 87.07%, respectively.

Conclusions: The combination of endobronchial ultrasound grayscale and elastography has potential value for malignant and benign lung lesions differentiation. The diagnostic scoring model established in this study needs further validation to guide the malignant and benign diagnosis of lung lesions.

Keywords: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA); diagnosis; elastography; grayscale; lung lesions.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2020-abpd-005). The series “Advance in Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Diseases” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. JS served as the unpaid Guest Editor of the series. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of CP-EBUS grayscale features for pulmonary lesions. CP-EBUS, convex probe endobronchial ultrasound.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curves analysis of long and short axes for lung lesions. The cutoff values of long and short axes were 29.20 and 25.41 mm, respectively. ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of diseases by elastography grading score. There were 3 cases of malignant lesions in score 2, including 1 neuroendocrine tumor not otherwise specified, 1 squamous cell carcinoma and 1 adenocarcinoma. The benign lesion was inflammation. The 13 malignant lesions in score 3 were 7 adenocarcinoma, 1 squamous cell carcinoma, 4 small cell carcinoma and 1 NSCLS-NOS. The 9 benign masses in score 4 contained 5 tuberculosis, 3 inflammation and 1 aspergillosis. The 6 malignant tumors in score 5 included 1 typical carcinoid tumor, 1 small cell carcinoma, 2 adenocarcinoma, 1 squamous cell carcinoma and 1 NSCLS-NOS. NSCLS-NOS, non-small cell lung cancer not otherwise specified.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424. 10.3322/caac.21492
    1. Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR, et al. Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143:e93S-120S.
    1. Beckh S, Bölcskei PL, Lessnau KD. Real-time chest ultrasonography: a comprehensive review for the pulmonologist. Chest 2002;122:1759-73. 10.1378/chest.122.5.1759
    1. Diacon AH, Theron J, Bolliger CT. Transthoracic ultrasound for the pulmonologist. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2005;11:307-12. 10.1097/01.mcp.0000166591.03042.1f
    1. Yasufuku K, Nakajima T, Chiyo M, et al. Endobronchial ultrasonography: current status and future directions. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:970-9. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318153fd8d
    1. Gompelmann D, Eberhardt R, Herth FJ. Endobronchial ultrasound. Endosc Ultrasound 2012;1:69-74. 10.7178/eus.02.003
    1. Kurimoto N, Murayama M, Yoshioka S, et al. Analysis of the internal structure of peripheral pulmonary lesions using endobronchial ultrasonography. Chest 2002;122:1887-94. 10.1378/chest.122.6.1887
    1. He HY, Chen JL, Ma H, et al. Value of Endobronchial Ultrasound Elastography in Diagnosis of Central Lung Lesions. Med Sci Monit 2017;23:3269-75. 10.12659/MSM.901808
    1. Yasuda K, Mukai H, Nakajima M, et al. Staging of pancreatic carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 1993;25:151-5. 10.1055/s-2007-1010274
    1. Rösch T, Braig C, Gain T, et al. Staging of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography. Comparison with conventional sonography, computed tomography, and angiography. Gastroenterology 1992;102:188-99. 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91800-J
    1. Zhi X, Chen J, Xie F, et al. Diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound image features: A specialized review. Endosc Ultrasound 2020. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: .10.4103/eus.eus_43_20
    1. Wahidi MM, Herth F, Yasufuku K, et al. Technical Aspects of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 2016;149:816-35. 10.1378/chest.15-1216
    1. Zaleska-Dorobisz U, Kaczorowski K, Pawluś A, et al. Ultrasound elastography - review of techniques and its clinical applications. Adv Clin Exp Med 2014;23:645-55. 10.17219/acem/26301
    1. Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, et al. Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications. Theranostics 2017;7:1303-29. 10.7150/thno.18650
    1. Dietrich CF, Jenssen C, Herth FJ. Endobronchial ultrasound elastography. Endosc Ultrasound 2016;5:233-8. 10.4103/2303-9027.187866
    1. Sun J, Zheng X, Mao X, et al. Endobronchial Ultrasound Elastography for Evaluation of Intrathoracic Lymph Nodes: A Pilot Study. Respiration 2017;93:327-38. 10.1159/000464253
    1. Wang L, Wu W, Hu Y, et al. Sonographic Features of Endobronchial Ultrasonography Predict Intrathoracic Lymph Node Metastasis in Lung Cancer Patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100:1203-9. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.143
    1. Ren HY, Zhang XJ, Zhang K, et al. Endobronchial Ultrasound Combined with Clinical Data for Predicting Malignant Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions. Cancer Manag Res 2020;12:9837-44. 10.2147/CMAR.S251683
    1. Parlamento S, Copetti R, Di Bartolomeo S. Evaluation of lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2009;27:379-84. 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.03.009
    1. Kuo CH, Lin SM, Chen HC, et al. Diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer with three echoic features via endobronchial ultrasound. Chest 2007;132:922-9. 10.1378/chest.06-3106
    1. Alici IO, Yilmaz Demirci N, Yilmaz A, et al. The sonographic features of malignant mediastinal lymph nodes and a proposal for an algorithmic approach for sampling during endobronchial ultrasound. Clin Respir J 2016;10:606-13. 10.1111/crj.12267
    1. Li F, Sone S, Abe H, et al. Malignant versus benign nodules at CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of thin-section CT findings. Radiology 2004;233:793-8. 10.1148/radiol.2333031018
    1. Hsu JS, Huang MS, Chen CY, et al. Correlation between EGFR mutation status and computed tomography features in patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Imaging 2014;29:357-63. 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000116
    1. Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990;16:553-9. 10.1016/0301-5629(90)90020-D
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74. 10.2307/2529310
    1. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950;3:32-5. 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>;2-3
    1. Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003;228:303-8. 10.1148/radiol.2282011860
    1. Nachiappan AC, Rahbar K, Shi X, et al. Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Role of Radiology in Diagnosis and Management. Radiographics 2017;37:52-72. 10.1148/rg.2017160032
    1. Fujiwara T, Yasufuku K, Nakajima T, et al. The utility of sonographic features during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for lymph node staging in patients with lung cancer: a standard endobronchial ultrasound image classification system. Chest 2010;138:641-7. 10.1378/chest.09-2006
    1. Gogia P, Insaf TZ, McNulty W, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound: morphological predictors of benign disease. ERJ Open Res 2016;2:00053-2015. 10.1183/23120541.00053-2015
    1. Reissig A, Kroegel C. Sonographic diagnosis and follow-up of pneumonia: a prospective study. Respiration 2007;74:537-47. 10.1159/000100427
    1. Kagawa T, Yuasa K, Fukunari F, et al. Quantitative evaluation of vascularity within cervical lymph nodes using Doppler ultrasound in patients with oral cancer: relation to lymph node size. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:415-21. 10.1259/dmfr/18694011
    1. Verhoeven RLJ, de Korte CL, van der Heijden E. Optimal Endobronchial Ultrasound Strain Elastography Assessment Strategy: An Explorative Study. Respiration 2019;97:337-47. 10.1159/000494143
    1. Uchimura K, Yamasaki K, Sasada S, et al. Quantitative analysis of endobronchial ultrasound elastography in computed tomography-negative mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Thorac Cancer 2020;11:2590-9. 10.1111/1759-7714.13579
    1. Abedini A, Razavi F, Farahani M, et al. The utility of elastography during EBUS-TBNA in a population with a high prevalence of anthracosis. Clin Respir J 2020;14:488-94. 10.1111/crj.13159
    1. Uchimura K, Yamasaki K, Kawanami T, et al. Influential Factors for Assessing Endobronchial Ultrasound Elastography. Respiration 2020. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: .10.1159/000510643
    1. Livi V, Cancellieri A, Pirina P, et al. Endobronchial Ultrasound Elastography Helps Identify Fibrotic Lymph Nodes in Sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;199:e24-5. 10.1164/rccm.201710-2004IM

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe