Reducing radiotherapy waiting times for palliative patients: The role of the Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist

Mary Job, Tanya Holt, Anne Bernard, Mary Job, Tanya Holt, Anne Bernard

Abstract

Introduction: Palliative radiotherapy is effective in reducing symptom burden and improving quality of life in patients with symptomatic metastatic cancer and should be delivered in a timely manner. The aim of this study was to determine whether referring patients directly to a Palliative Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist (APRT) improves access to palliative radiotherapy and reduces time from referral to treatment.

Methods: At Radiation Oncology Mater Center (ROMC) in Brisbane, Australia a new referral pathway was developed which involved patients requiring palliative radiotherapy, being referred directly to the APRT from a single external hospital medical oncology and palliative care departments. Over a 5 months period, patient demographics and time in working days from referral to treatment were compared for consecutive palliative patients seen within our department. Patients were stratified by method of referral i.e. via the new referral pathway (NP) or via standard referral pathway (SP).

Results: Between October 2014 and March 2015, a total of 150 patients were referred for palliative radiotherapy. Of these patients, 48 were referred and processed via the NP. There was a significant reduction in the number of days from referral to treatment for patients referred through the NP. Patients referred through the NP via the APRT had a mean and median wait time of 3.5 and 3 days respectively compared with 8.1 and 5 days for patients referred through the SP (P = <0.001). Patients were also more likely to have the treatment completed with less visits to the hospital (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The new referral pathway utilising a dedicated palliative APRT decreased waiting times for patients receiving palliative radiotherapy and improved timely access to the radiotherapy service for both referrers and patients.

Keywords: Advanced practice; quality improvement; radiation therapist; referral; waiting lists.

© 2017 The Authors and State of Queensland. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of referral pathways. Admin, administration; APRT, advanced practice radiation therapist; RO, radiation oncologist; RT, radiation therapist; Consult, consultation; XRT, radiation therapy.

References

    1. Bedard G. Handbook of Bone Metastases For Healthcare Professionals, 2nd edn. Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, 2014.
    1. Holt TR, Yau VKY. Innovative program for palliative radiotherapy in Australia. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2009; 54: 76–81.
    1. Janjan N. Palliative radiation therapy: Utilization of advanced technologies Fairchild AM. (ed). Vol 1, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2015.
    1. Nieder C, Spanne O, Haukland E, Dalhaug A. Does time between imaging diagnosis and initiation of radiotherapy impact survival after whole‐brain radiotherapy for brain metastases? ISRN Oncol 2013; 2013: 4.
    1. Hubbard G, Maguire R, Kidd L, Kearney N, Hilliam A. Patient views of transport for cancer treatment. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2006; 10: 391–5.
    1. Bolderston A. Advanced practice perspectives in radiation therapy. J Radiother Pract 2004; 4: 57–65.
    1. Ford P. The role of the consultant radiographer – Experience of appointees. Radiography 2010; 16: 189–97.
    1. Forsyth LJ, Maehle V. Consultant radiographers: Profile of the first generation. Radiography 2010; 16: 279–85.
    1. Fairchild A, Pituskin E, Rose B, et al. The rapid access palliative radiotherapy program: Blueprint for initiation of a one‐stop multidisciplinary bone metastases clinic. Support Care Cancer 2009; 17: 163–70.
    1. Chow E, Wong R, Connolly R, Hruby G, Franssen E, et al. Prospective assessment of symptom palliation for patients attending a rapid response radiotherapy program: Feasibility of telephone follow‐up. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001; 22: 649–56.
    1. Committee TT . Tripartite Radiation Oncology Practice Standards – The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists 2011. Available from: .
    1. Robinson D, Massey T, Davies E, Jack RH, Sehgal A, Møller H. Waiting times for radiotherapy: Variation over time and between cancer networks in southeast England. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 1201–8.
    1. Casson C, Johnson J. Implementation and evaluation of a rapid access palliative clinic in a New Zealand cancer centre. J Med Radiat Sci 2014; 61: 217–24.
    1. Thavarajah N, Wong K, Zhang L, et al. Continued success in providing timely palliative radiation therapy at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program: A review of 2008–2012. Curr Oncol 2013; 20: e206–11.
    1. De Sa E, Sinclair E, Mitera G, et al. Continued success of the rapid response radiotherapy program: A review of 2004–2008. Support Care Cancer 2009; 17: 757–62.
    1. Danjoux C, Chow E, Drossos A, et al. An innovative rapid response radiotherapy program to reduce waiting time for palliative radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2006; 14: 38–43.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe