Iontophoresis Versus Cyriax-Type exercises in Chronic Tennis Elbow among industrial workers

Abdelhamid Akram Fathy, Abdelhamid Akram Fathy

Abstract

Introduction: Tennis elbow (TE) is one of the most commonly encountered upper limb conditions. It mainly affects people who use the hand grip against resistance frequently, resulting in microtrauma to the wrist extensors tendon, causing pain. This study was conducted to compare the application of iontophoresis of 0.4% dexamethasone and Cyriax-type exercises in the treatment of chronic tennis elbow (CTE).

Methods: Twenty-two industrial worker diagnosed as having CTE participated in this study, and their ages ranged from 25 to 52. They were assigned randomly to two groups, i.e., "group A" in which the workers were treated by iontophoresis of 0.4% Dexamethasone and "group B" in which the workers were treated by conducting Cyriax-type exercises on the affected tendon. Both groups received stretching exercises for the common extensors tendon for 10 minutes in addition to five minutes of pulsed US 1.1 W/cm2 six times over two weeks. The outcome of the treatment was assessed one week after the last session by the visual analog scale (VAS) to assess pain, by the Oxford elbow score (OES) to measure the patient's satisfaction, and by a handgrip dynamometer to measure the strength of the handgrip.

Results: The application of 0.4% dexamethasone iontophoresis and the use of Cyriax-type exercises both provided significant improvement in the pain, patient's satisfaction, and the power of the handgrip, and there were no significant difference (p > 0.001) in any of the three measures after the first week's treatment.

Conclusions: Both iontophoresis of 0.4% dexamethasone and Cyriax-type exercises were successful as treatment modalities for patients with CTE, and there were no significant differences between both of them in the treatment of those cases.

Keywords: Cyriax exercises; Iontophoresis; dexamethasone; tennis elbow.

References

    1. Vicenzino B. Lateral epicondylagia. A review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, aetlogy and natural history. Physical therapy reviews. 2006;1:23–34.
    1. Wood WA, Strawart A. Lateral epicondylagia: and overview. J Physical Therapy. 2006;11:155–60. doi: 10.1179/108331906X99092.
    1. Ciccotti MC, Schwartz MA, Cicotti MG. Diagnosis and treatment of medial epicondylitis of the elbow. Clin Sports Med. 2011;23:693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2004.04.011.
    1. Nagrale Amit V, Herd Christopher R, Ganvir Shyam, Ramteke Gopichand. Cyriax Physiotherapy Versus Phonophoresis with Supervised Exercise in Subjects with Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):171–8.
    1. Stoeckart R, Vleeming A. Anatomy of the extensor carpi radialsbrevis muscle related to tennis elbow. Clin Biomech. 4:10–15.
    1. Kushner S, Reid DC. Manipulation in the treatment of tennis elbow. J orthop sportsphys Ther. 1999;7:264–72. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1986.7.5.264.
    1. Soderberg J, Grooten WJ, Bigol BO. Effects of eccentric training on hand strength. Sports. 2012;22:797–803.
    1. Nirschl RP, Rodin DM, Marratmanaa-Moe Iontophoresic administration of Dexamethasone sodium phosphate for tennis elbow. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:189–95.
    1. Oner C, Armagan O. The treatment of lateral epicondylitis with iontophoresis of ibuprofen and low level LASER. Am J Sports Med. 2003;36:245–251.
    1. Grossi E, Monza GC, Pollavini S, Bona L. NASID ionization in the management of soft-tissue rheutism: role played by the drug. Electrical stimulation and suggestion. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002;4:265–7.
    1. Runeson L, Haker E. Iontophoresis with cortisone in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis a double blind study. Scand J Med Sci sports. 2002;12:136–42. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2002.02142.x.
    1. Stefanou A, Marshall N, Holdan W, Siddiqui A. A randomized study comparing corticosteroid injection to costicosteroid Iontophoresis for lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:104–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.005.
    1. Cyriax HJ, Cyriax JP. Cyriax’s illustrated manual of orthopedic medicine. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1983.
    1. Cyriax James. Book of Orthopedic Medicine. 11th edn. Vol. 1. AICBS Publication; 2001.
    1. Stasinopoulos D, Johnson IM. Cyriax physiotherapy for tennis elbow/lateral epicondylitis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2004;38:675–7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013573.
    1. Van Gemert JGWA. Arthrodesis of the wrist joint. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55(Suppl 210):1–146. doi: 10.3109/17453678409154150.
    1. Thurtle OA, Tyler AK, Cawley MI. Grip strength as a measure of response to treatment for lateral epicondylitis. Br J Rheumatol. 1984;23:154–5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/23.2.154.
    1. Manchanda G, Grover D. Effectiveness of movement with mobilization compared with manipulation of wrist in case of lateral epicondylitis. Ind. J. Physiotherapy and Ocuup. Therapy. 2008;2(1):1345–8.
    1. Verhaar J, Walenkamp H, Mameren HL. Local corticoid injection versus Cyriax-type physiotherapy for tennis elbow. J, Bone Joint Surg. 2008;78:128–32.
    1. De Bruijn R. Deep transverse friction: Its analgesic effect. Int J Sports Med. 1984;05:S35–S36. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1025944.
    1. Nagrale AV, Herd CR, Ganvir S. Cyriax physiotherapy Versus Phonophoresis with supervised exercises in the subjects with lateral epicondylagia: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):171–179. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.171.
    1. Smidt N, Assendelft WJ, van der Windt DA, Hay EM, Buchbinder R, Bouter LM. Corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Pain. 2002;96:23–40. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00388-8.
    1. Stefanou A, Marshall N, Holdan W, Siddiqui A. A randomized study comparing corticosteroid injection to costicosteroid Iontophoresis for lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg Am. 37:104–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.005.
    1. Yarrobino TE, Kalbfleisch JH, Ferslew KE, Panus PC. Lidocaine iontophoresis mediates analgesia in lateral epicondylalgia treatment. Physiother Res Int. 2006;11:152–60. doi: 10.1002/pri.338.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe