Non-nutritive sucking evaluation in preterm newborns and the start of oral feeding: a multicenter study

Flávia C B Neiva, Cléa R Leone, Claudio Leone, Lisiane L Siqueira, Kátia Akiko Uema, Daiana Evangelista, Susana Delgado, Adriana Rocha, Karina Bernardis Buhler, Flávia C B Neiva, Cléa R Leone, Claudio Leone, Lisiane L Siqueira, Kátia Akiko Uema, Daiana Evangelista, Susana Delgado, Adriana Rocha, Karina Bernardis Buhler

Abstract

Objectives: The assessment of early sucking by preterm infants provides information on the ability of these infants to efficiently and safely receive nutrients via an oral route (oral feeding). To analyze the application and reliability of an instrument in assessing non-nutritive sucking that indicates a capacity for oral feeding in the routine care of different neonatal units.

Methods: A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in seven neonatal units. A non-nutritive sucking assessment with a formulary validated by Neiva et al (2008) (variables evaluated: rooting reaction; easy initiation of sucking; labial sealing; tongue central groove; peristaltic tongue movements; jaw raising and lowering movements; labial, tongue and jaw coordination; sucking strength; sucking rhythm; bites; excessive jaw excursion; stress signals) was applied to 199 pre-term newborns, who had a chronological age ≥ 2 days and were clinically stable. These infants were divided into two groups based on their corrected gestational age at the first assessment, as follows: Group I-infants with a gestational age ≤ 33 weeks and Group II-infants with a gestational age between 34 and 36 6/7 weeks.

Results: The mean gestational age was 31.66±2 weeks, and the mean birth weight was 1494 ± 373 g. The mean scores on the non-nutritive sucking assessment were 46 ± 25 in Group I and 49 ± 24 in Group II. The beginning of oral feeding was successful in 43 (67.2%) infants in Group I and 64 (81%) infants in Group II (p = 0.089).

Conclusion: The method identified preterm infants who were able to feed orally based on 33 points in the non-nutritive sucking assessment and a corrected gestational age of 32 weeks or more. The corrected gestational age was the most important factor in predicting the success of oral feeding.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Non-nutritive sucking score system- NNS.

References

    1. Leone CR. Técnicas de alimentação por via digestiva no recém-nascido de muito baixo peso. In: Trindade Filho O, Alves Filho N, editors. Clínica de Perinatologia - Procedimentos e Técnicas em Neonatologia. Rio de Janeiro: MEAS Editora médica e Científica Ltda; 2002. pp. 13–9.
    1. Hernandez AM. Atuação fonoaudiológica em neonatologia: uma proposta de intervenção. In: Andrade CRF, editor. Fonoaudiologia em berçário normal e de risco-série atualidades emfonoaudiologia. Vol. 1996. São Paulo: EditoraLovise; pp. 43–98. organizador. p.
    1. Mc Cain GC, Gartside PS, Greenberg JM, Lott JW. A feeding protocol for healthy preterm infants that shortens time to oral feeding. J Pediatr. 2001;139(3):374–9.
    1. Bingham PM, Ashikaga T, Abbasi S. Prospective study of non-nutritive sucking and feeding skills in premature infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95(3):F194–200.
    1. Simpson C, Schanler R, Lau C. Early introduction of oral feeding in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):517–22.
    1. Neiva FCB, Leone CR, Leone C. Validation of a non nutritive sucking score system for oral feeding in preterm newborns. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(10):1370–5.
    1. Lau C, Alagugurusamy R, Schanler RJ, Smith EO, Shulman RJ. Characterization of the developmental stages of sucking in preterm infants during bottle feeding. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89(7):846–52.
    1. Braun MA, Palmer M. A pilot study of oral motor dysfunction in ‘at risk' infants. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1986;5(4):13–25.
    1. Medeiros AP, Ferreira JT, Felício CM. Correlation Between feeding methods, non-nutritive sucking and orofacial behaviors. Pro Fono. 2009;21(4):315–9.
    1. Bauer MA, Prade LS, Keske-Soares M, Haëffner LSB, Weinmann ARM. The oral motor capacity and feeding performance of preterm newbors at the time of transition to oral feeding. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2008;41(10):904–7.
    1. Costa SP, Schans CP. The reliability of the Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(1):21–6.
    1. Fujinaga CI. Prontidão do prematuro para iniciar alimentação oral: proposta de um instrumento de avaliação [dissertação] Ribeirão Preto. 2002 Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo.
    1. Palmer MM. Identification and management of the transitional suck pattern in premature infants. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1993;7 (1) :66–75.
    1. Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States National Reference for Fetal Growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):163–8.
    1. 1999 Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 17.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe