Platelet Function During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adult Patients

Camilla Mains Balle, Anni Nørgaard Jeppesen, Steffen Christensen, Anne-Mette Hvas, Camilla Mains Balle, Anni Nørgaard Jeppesen, Steffen Christensen, Anne-Mette Hvas

Abstract

Objective: Hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications are common during support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). As platelets play a pivotal role in hemostasis, we aimed to clarify how ECMO support affects platelet function. Methods: We included 33 adult patients undergoing ECMO support at a tertiary ECMO referral center at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Blood samples were collected on the first morning following ECMO initiation, and subsequently every morning until the 7th (±1) day. Platelet aggregation was evaluated by whole blood impedance aggregometry (Multiplate® Analyzer) using adenosine diphosphate (ADPtest), arachidonic acid (ASPItest), and thrombin-receptor-agonist-peptide-6 (TRAPtest) as agonists. A new model was applied, taking platelet count into consideration in interpretation of impedance aggregometry analyses. On the 1st and 3rd day, platelet activation was assessed by flow cytometry (Navios) using collagen-related peptide, ADP, TRAP, and arachidonic acid as agonists. Results: Blood samples from all 33 patients were analyzed on day 1 of ECMO support; 24 patients were still receiving ECMO and analyzed on day 3; 12 patients were analyzed on day 7 (±1). After ECMO initiation, platelet counts decreased significantly (p < 0.002) and remained low during ECMO support. ECMO patients demonstrated significantly reduced platelet aggregation on day 1 compared with healthy controls (all p < 0.001). However, when taking platelet count into consideration, platelet aggregation relative to platelet count did not differ from healthy controls. Flow cytometry analyses demonstrated impaired platelet activation in ECMO patients on day 1 compared with healthy controls (all p < 0.03). No substantial difference was found in platelet activation from day 1 to day 3 on ECMO support. Conclusions: Employing impedance aggregometry and flow cytometry, we found both impaired platelet aggregation and decreased platelet activation on day 1 of ECMO support compared with healthy controls. However, platelet aggregation was not impaired, when interpreted relative to the low platelet counts. Furthermore, levels of bound fibrinogen, on the surface of activated platelets in ECMO patients, were higher than in healthy controls. Together, these findings suggestively oppose that platelets are universally impaired during ECMO support. No marked difference in activation from day 1 to day 3 was seen during ECMO support.

Keywords: blood platelets; extracorporeal life support; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; platelet activation; platelet aggregation; platelet function tests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Platelet counts obtained prior to and during support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The bars indicate median and interquartile range. The gray area represents a combined reference interval on platelet count for men and women. An X-mark in the circle indicates that the patient has received platelet concentrate within 24 h prior to blood sampling.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustrates the platelets ability to aggregate in response to stimulation by three different agonists. Platelet aggregation was measured during support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and compared with healthy controls. Agonists used to stimulate platelet aggregation: (A) ADP, Adenosine diphosphate; (C) AA, arachidonic acid; and (B) TRAP, thrombin receptor activating peptide-6. The bars indicate mean with standard deviation. An X-mark in the circle indicates that the patient has received platelet concentrate within 24 h prior to blood sampling. To illustrate the association between platelet aggregation and platelet count, patients with platelet counts below 50 × 109 /L are marked red. Due to practical reasons, platelet aggregation on day 2 was not measured in 2 patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustrates the degree of platelet activation in response to stimulation by four different agonists. The degree of activation can be measured as a change in the expression of the activation-dependent platelet surface markers bound-fibrinogen, CD63 and P-selectin on day 1 of support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The results are compared with healthy controls, n = 33. (A–C) The percentage of activated platelets in response to stimulation by an agonist; (D–F) The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the activated platelets following stimulation by an agonist. Agonists used to activate the platelets: COL, Collagen-related peptide; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; TRAP, thrombin receptor activating peptide-6; and AA, arachidonic acid. The bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Illustrates the degree of platelet activation in response to stimulation by four different agonists. The activation can be measured as a change in the expression of the activation-dependent platelet surface markers: Bound-fibrinogen, CD63 and P-selectin. (A–C) The percentage of activated platelets in response to stimulation by an agonist; (D–F) The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the activated platelets following stimulation by an agonist. Platelet activation on day 1 of support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is compared with platelet activation measured on day 3 of ECMO support, n = 24. Patients weaned from ECMO support prior to day 3 were excluded from this analysis on the difference between day 1 and 3. Agonists used to stimulate platelet activation: COL, Collagen-related peptide; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; TRAP, thrombin receptor activating peptide-6; and AA, arachidonic acid. The bars indicate median and interquartile range.

References

    1. Marasco SF, Lukas G, McDonald M, McMillan J, Ihle B. Review of ECMO (extra corporeal membrane oxygenation) support in critically ill adult patients. Heart Lung Circ. (2008) 17(Suppl. 4):S41–7. 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.08.009
    1. Bartlett RH. ECMO: The next ten years. Egypt J Crit Care Med. (2016) 4:7–10. 10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.01.003
    1. Thiagarajan RR, Barbaro RP, Rycus PT, McMullan DM, Conrad SA, Fortenberry JD, et al. Extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J. (2017) 63:60–7. 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000475
    1. Vaquer S, de Haro C, Peruga P, Oliva JC, Artigas A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and mortality of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. (2017) 7:51. 10.1186/s13613-017-0275-4
    1. Aubron C, Cheng AC, Pilcher D, Leong T, Magrin G, Cooper DJ, et al. . Factors associated with outcomes of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a 5-year cohort study. Crit Care. (2013) 17:R73. 10.1186/cc12681
    1. Brogan TV, Thiagarajan RR, Rycus PT, Bartlett RH, Bratton SL. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with severe respiratory failure: a multi-center database. Intensive Care Med. (2009) 35:2105–14. 10.1007/s00134-009-1661-7
    1. Arachchillage DRJ, Passariello M, Laffan M, Aw TC, Owen L, Banya W, et al. . Intracranial hemorrhage and early mortality in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe respiratory failure. Semin Thromb Hemost. (2018) 44:276–86. 10.1055/s-0038-1636840
    1. Kreyer S, Muders T, Theuerkauf N, Spitzhuttl J, Schellhaas T, Schewe JC, et al. . Hemorrhage under veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a retrospective data analysis. J Thorac Dis. (2017) 9:5017–29. 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.05
    1. Sutter R. Acute neurologic complications during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-a systematic review. Crit Care Med. (2018) 1:3223 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003223
    1. Fletcher Sandersjoo A, Bartek J, Jr, Thelin EP, Eriksson A, Elmi-Terander A, Broman M, et al. . Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an observational cohort study. J Intensive Care. (2017) 5:27. 10.1186/s40560-017-0223-2
    1. Zangrillo A, Landoni G, Biondi-Zoccai G, Greco M, Greco T, Frati G, et al. . A meta-analysis of complications and mortality of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Resusc. (2013) 15:172–8.
    1. Rastan AJ, Lachmann N, Walther T, Doll N, Gradistanac T, Gommert JF, et al. . Autopsy findings in patients on postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Int J Artif Organs. (2006) 29:1121–31. 10.1177/039139880602901205
    1. Yoshimoto Y, Hasebe T, Takahashi K, Amari M, Nagashima S, Kamijo A, et al. . Ultrastructural characterization of surface-induced platelet activation on artificial materials by transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech. (2013) 76:342–9. 10.1002/jemt.22172
    1. Chen Z, Mondal NK, Zheng S, Koenig SC, Slaughter MS, Griffith BP, et al. High shear induces platelet dysfunction leading to enhanced thrombotic propensity and diminished hemostatic capacity. Platelets. (2017) 2017:1–8. 10.1080/09537104.2017.1384542
    1. Chen Z, Mondal NK, Ding J, Koenig SC, Slaughter MS, Wu ZJ. Paradoxical effect of nonphysiological shear stress on platelets and von willebrand factor. Artif Organs. (2016) 40:659–68. 10.1111/aor.12606
    1. Laine A, Niemi T, Suojaranta-Ylinen R, Raivio P, Soininen L, Lemstrom K, et al. . Decreased maximum clot firmness in rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM(R)) is associated with bleeding during extracorporeal mechanical circulatory support. Perfusion. (2016). 31:625–33. 10.1177/0267659116647473
    1. Tauber H, Streif W, Fritz J, Ott H, Weigel G, Loacker L, et al. . Predicting transfusion requirements during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. (2016) 30:692–701. 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.01.009
    1. Mutlak H, Reyher C, Meybohm P, Papadopoulos N, Hanke AA, Zacharowski K, et al. . Multiple electrode aggregometry for the assessment of acquired platelet dysfunctions during extracorporeal circulation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2015) 63:21–7. 10.1055/s-0034-1383817
    1. Nair P, Hoechter DJ, Buscher H, Venkatesh K, Whittam S, Joseph J, et al. . Prospective observational study of hemostatic alterations during adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) using point-of-care thromboelastometry and platelet aggregometry. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. (2015) 29:288–96. 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.06.006
    1. Lukito P, Wong A, Jing J, Arthur JF, Marasco SF, Murphy DA, et al. . Mechanical circulatory support is associated with loss of platelet receptors glycoprotein Ibalpha and glycoprotein VI. J Thromb Haemost. (2016) 14:2253–60. 10.1111/jth.13497
    1. Chung JH, Yeo HJ, Kim D, Lee SM, Han J, Kim M, et al. . Changes in the levels of beta-thromboglobulin and inflammatory mediators during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Int J Artif Organs. (2017) 40:575–80. 10.5301/ijao.5000617
    1. Kalbhenn J, Schlagenhauf A, Rosenfelder S, Schmutz A, Zieger B. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome and impaired platelet function during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: rapid onset and fast recovery. J Heart Lung Transplant. (2018) 37:985–91. 10.1016/j.healun.2018.03.013
    1. Skipper MT, Rubak P, Larsen OH, Hvas A-M. Thrombocytopenia model with minimal manipulation of blood cells allowing whole blood assessment of platelet function. Platelets. (2016) 27:295–300. 10.3109/09537104.2015.1095873
    1. Femia EA, Scavone M, Lecchi A, Cattaneo M. Effect of platelet count on platelet aggregation measured with impedance aggregometry (Multiplate analyzer) and with light transmission aggregometry. J Thromb Haemost. (2013) 11:2193–6. 10.1111/jth.12432
    1. Würtz M, Hvas A-M, Kristensen SD, Grove EL. Platelet aggregation is dependent on platelet count in patients with coronary artery disease. Thromb Res. (2012) 129:56–61. 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.08.019
    1. Stissing T, Dridi NP, Ostrowski SR, Bochsen L, Johansson PI. The influence of low platelet count on whole blood aggregometry assessed by Multiplate. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. (2011) 17:E211–7. 10.1177/1076029610397183
    1. Hanke AA, Roberg K, Monaca E, Sellmann T, Weber CF, Rahe-Meyer N, et al. . Impact of platelet count on results obtained from multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (Multiplate). Eur J Med Res. (2010) 15:214–9. 10.1186/2047-783x-15-5-214
    1. Rubak P, Villadsen K, Hvas AM. Reference intervals for platelet aggregation assessed by multiple electrode platelet aggregometry. Thromb Res. (2012) 130:420–3. 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.06.017
    1. Hayward CP, Moffat KA, Pai M, Liu Y, Seecharan J, McKay H, et al. An evaluation of methods for determining reference intervals for light transmission platelet aggregation tests on samples with normal or reduced platelet counts. Thromb Haemost. (2008) 100:134–45. 10.1160/TH08-03-0183
    1. Skipper MT, Rubak P, Stentoft J, Hvas AM, Larsen OH. Evaluation of platelet function in thrombocytopenia. Platelets. (2017) 2017:1–7. 10.1080/09537104.2017.1296566
    1. Linden MD, Frelinger AL, III, Barnard MR, Przyklenk K, Furman MI, Michelson AD. Application of flow cytometry to platelet disorders. Semin Thromb Hemost. (2004) 30:501–11. 10.1055/s-2004-835671
    1. Schmitz G, Rothe G, Ruf A, Barlage S, Tschope D, Clemetson KJ, et al. . European working group on clinical cell analysis: consensus protocol for the flow cytometric characterisation of platelet function. Thromb Haemost. (1998) 79:885–96. 10.1055/s-0037-1615088
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. (1987) 40:373–83. 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
    1. Vasilevskis EE, Pandharipande PP, Graves AJ, Shintani A, Tsuruta R, Ely EW, et al. . Validity of a modified sequential organ failure assessment score using the richmond agitation-sedation scale. Crit Care Med. (2016) 44:138–46. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001375
    1. Pedersen OH, Larsen ML, Grove EL, van Kooten Niekerk PB, Bonlokke S, Nissen PH, et al. . Platelet characteristics in patients with essential thrombocytosis. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. (2018) 94:918–27. 10.1002/cyto.b.21642
    1. Rubak P, Nissen PH, Kristensen SD, Hvas AM. Investigation of platelet function and platelet disorders using flow cytometry. Platelets. (2016) 27:66–74. 10.3109/09537104.2015.1032919
    1. Ramstrom S, Sodergren AL, Tynngard N, Lindahl TL. Platelet function determined by flow cytometry: new perspectives? Semin Thromb Hemost. (2016) 42:268–81. 10.1055/s-0035-1570082
    1. Pedersen OH, Nissen PH, Hvas AM. Platelet function investigation by flow cytometry: sample volume, needle size, and reference intervals. Platelets. (2018) 29:199–202. 10.1080/09537104.2017.1353684
    1. Weingart C, Lubnow M, Philipp A, Bein T, Camboni D, Muller T. Comparison of coagulation parameters, anticoagulation, and need for transfusion in patients on interventional lung assist or veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artif Organs. (2015) 39:765–73. 10.1111/aor.12464
    1. Oliver WC. Anticoagulation and coagulation management for ECMO. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. (2009) 13:154–75. 10.1177/1089253209347384
    1. Abrams D, Baldwin MR, Champion M, Agerstrand C, Eisenberger A, Bacchetta M, et al. . Thrombocytopenia and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with acute respiratory failure: a cohort study. Intensive Care Med. (2016) 42:844–52. 10.1007/s00134-016-4312-9
    1. Dzierba AL, Roberts R, Muir J, Alhammad A, Schumaker G, Clark J, et al. . Severe thrombocytopenia in adults with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use. ASAIO J. (2016) 62:710–4. 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000415
    1. Ault KA, Rinder HM, Mitchell J, Carmody MB, Vary CP, Hillman RS. The significance of platelets with increased RNA content (reticulated platelets). A measure of the rate of thrombopoiesis. Am J Clin Pathol. (1992) 98:637–46. 10.1093/ajcp/98.6.637
    1. Fager AM, Wood JP, Bouchard BA, Feng P, Tracy PB. Properties of procoagulant platelets: defining and characterizing the subpopulation binding a functional prothrombinase. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2010) 30:2400–7. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.216531
    1. Ibrahim H, Schutt RC, Hannawi B, DeLao T, Barker CM, Kleiman NS. Association of immature platelets with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2014) 64:2122–9. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1210
    1. Guthikonda S, Lev EI, Patel R, DeLao T, Bergeron AL, Dong JF, et al. . Reticulated platelets and uninhibited COX-1 and COX-2 decrease the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. J Thromb Haemost. (2007) 5:490–6. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02387.x
    1. Slepian MJ, Sheriff J, Hutchinson M, Tran P, Bajaj N, Garcia JGN, et al. . Shear-mediated platelet activation in the free flow: perspectives on the emerging spectrum of cell mechanobiological mechanisms mediating cardiovascular implant thrombosis. J Biomech. (2017) 50:20–5. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.016
    1. Sheriff J, Tran PL, Hutchinson M, DeCook T, Slepian MJ, Bluestein D, et al. . Repetitive hypershear activates and sensitizes platelets in a dose-dependent manner. Artif Organs. (2016) 40:586–95. 10.1111/aor.12602
    1. Chen Z, Mondal NK, Ding J, Gao J, Griffith BP, Wu ZJ. Shear-induced platelet receptor shedding by non-physiological high shear stress with short exposure time: glycoprotein Ibalpha and glycoprotein VI. Thromb Res. (2015) 135:692–8. 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.01.030
    1. Al-Tamimi M, Tan CW, Qiao J, Pennings GJ, Javadzadegan A, Yong AS, et al. . Pathologic shear triggers shedding of vascular receptors: a novel mechanism for down-regulation of platelet glycoprotein VI in stenosed coronary vessels. Blood. (2012) 119:4311–20. 10.1182/blood-2011-10-386607
    1. Chen Z, Li T, Kareem K, Tran D, Griffith BP, Wu ZJ. The role of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in non-physiological shear stress-induced platelet activation. Artif Organs. (2019). 10.1111/aor.13465. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Chen Z, Zhang J, Kareem K, Tran D, Conway RG, Arias K, et al. . Device-induced platelet dysfunction in mechanically assisted circulation increases the risks of thrombosis and bleeding. Artif Organs. (2019) 43:745–55. 10.1111/aor.13445
    1. Shattil SJ, Newman PJ. Integrins: dynamic scaffolds for adhesion and signaling in platelets. Blood. (2004) 104:1606–15. 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1257
    1. Au AE, Josefsson EC. Regulation of platelet membrane protein shedding in health and disease. Platelets. (2017) 28:342–53. 10.1080/09537104.2016.1203401
    1. Cheung PY, Sawicki G, Salas E, Etches PC, Schulz R, Radomski MW. The mechanisms of platelet dysfunction during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically ill neonates. Crit Care Med. (2000) 28:2584–90. 10.1097/00003246-200007000-00067
    1. Tynngard N. Preparation, storage and quality control of platelet concentrates. Transfus Apher Sci. (2009) 41:97–104. 10.1016/j.transci.2009.07.001
    1. Vucetic D, Ilic V, Vojvodic D, Subota V, Todorovic M, Balint B. Flow cytometry analysis of platelet populations: usefulness for monitoringthe storage lesion in pooled buffy-coat platelet concentrates. Blood Transfus. (2018) 16:83–92. 10.2450/2016.0193-16
    1. Xiao Z, Theroux P. Platelet activation with unfractionated heparin at therapeutic concentrations and comparisons with a low-molecular-weight heparin and with a direct thrombin inhibitor. Circulation. (1998) 97:251–6. 10.1161/01.CIR.97.3.251
    1. Gao C, Boylan B, Fang J, Wilcox DA, Newman DK, Newman PJ. Heparin promotes platelet responsiveness by potentiating alphaIIbbeta3-mediated outside-in signaling. Blood. (2011) 117:4946–52. 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307751

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe