Reliability and Accuracy of Palpable Anterior Neck Landmarks for the Identification of Cervical Spinal Levels

Koopong Siribumrungwong, Chitpon Sinchai, Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich, Weera Chaiyamongkol, Koopong Siribumrungwong, Chitpon Sinchai, Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich, Weera Chaiyamongkol

Abstract

Study design: A descriptive experimental study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the reliability and accuracy of palpable anterior neck landmarks (angle of the mandible, hyoid bone, thyroid cartilage, and cricoid cartilage) for the identification of cervical spinal levels in a slight neck-extended position as in anterior approach cervical spinal surgery.

Overview of literature: Standard, palpable anatomical landmarks for the identification of cervical spinal levels were described by Hoppenfeld using the midline palpable anterior structures (angle of the mandible [C2 body], hyoid bone [C3 body], thyroid cartilage [C4-C5 disc], cricoid cartilage [C6 body], and carotid tubercle [C6 body]) to determine the approximate level for skin incisions. However, in clinical practice, patients are positioned with a slight neck extension to achieve cervical lordosis. This positioning (neck extension) may result in changes in the locations of anatomical landmarks compared with those reported in previous studies.

Methods: This experimental study was conducted on 96 volunteers. Each volunteer was palpated for locating four anatomical landmarks three times by three different orthopedic surgeons. We collected data from the level of the vertebral body or the vertebral disc matching the surface anatomical landmarks from the vertical reference line.

Results: Accuracy of the angle of the mandible located at the C2 vertebral body was 95.5%, the hyoid bone located at the C2/3 intervertebral disc was 51.7%, the thyroid cartilage located at the C4 vertebral body was 42%, and the cricoid cartilage located at the C5/6 intervertebral disc was 43.4%.

Conclusions: With the neck in a slightly extended position to achieve cervical lordosis, the angle of the mandible, the hyoid bone, the thyroid cartilage, and the cricoid cartilage were most often located at the C2 body, the C2/3 disc, the C4 body, and the C5/6 disc, respectively. The angle of the mandible and the hyoid bone are highly reliable surface anatomical landmarks for the identification of cervical spinal levels than the thyroid cartilage and the cricoid cartilage.

Keywords: Anatomic landmarks; Cervical spine.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1. Volunteers were positioned in a…
Fig. 1. Volunteers were positioned in a supine position on an operating table with their necks in a slightly extended position to achieve normal cervical lordosis.
Fig. 2. Each of the radiographs had…
Fig. 2. Each of the radiographs had vertical lines drawn from four markers to the cervical vertebral body or disc space.

References

    1. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40-A:607–624.
    1. Rhee JM, Yoon T, Riew KD. Cervical radiculopathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:486–494.
    1. Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW, Vigna F, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC. A comparison of retraction pressure during anterior cervical plate surgery and cervical disc replacement: a cadaveric study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:312–317.
    1. Hoppenfeld S, DeBoer P. Surgical exposures in orthopaedics: the anatomic approach. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.
    1. Lee JH, Lee JH, Lee HS, Lee DY, Lee DO. The efficacy of carotid tubercle as an anatomical landmark for identification of cervical spinal level in the anterior cervical surgery: comparison with preoperative C-arm fluoroscopy. Clin Orthop Surg. 2013;5:129–133.
    1. Auerbach JD, Weidner Z, Pill SG, Mehta S, Chin KR. The mandibular angle as a landmark for identification of cervical spinal level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1006–1011.
    1. Leonard M, Kennedy C, Heneghan H, Cabe JM. The application of a radiographically determined ratio as a new technique to identify the optimal level of transverse skin incision for anterior cervical spine surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:1278–1280.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
    1. Daniels AH, Riew KD, Yoo JU, et al. Adverse events associated with anterior cervical spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:729–738.
    1. Cha YD, Lee SK, Kim TJ, Han TH. The neck crease as a landmark of Chassaignac's tubercle in stellate ganglion block: anatomical and radiological evaluation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46:100–102.
    1. Chin KR, Auerbach JD, Adams SB, Jr, Sodl JF, Riew KD. Mastication causing segmental spinal motion in common cervical orthoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:430–434.
    1. Andrade AV, Gomes PF, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Cervical spine alignment and hyoid bone positioning with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:767–772.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe