Comparison between lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation: a single-blind randomized prospective study

Pooja Rawat Mathur, Neena Jain, Aji Kumar, Beena Thada, Veena Mathur, Deepak Garg, Pooja Rawat Mathur, Neena Jain, Aji Kumar, Beena Thada, Veena Mathur, Deepak Garg

Abstract

Background: The preferred management strategy for difficult airways is awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided intubation, which requires effective airway anesthesia to ensure patient comfort and acceptance. This randomized single-blind prospective study was conducted to compare lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for airway anesthesia prior to awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided intubation.

Methods: Sixty adult patients scheduled for surgical procedures under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups. Group N received jet nebulization (10 ml of 4% lignocaine) and Group B received bilateral superior laryngeal and transtracheal recurrent laryngeal nerve blocks (each with 2 ml of 2% lignocaine) followed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation. All patients received procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine. The intubation time, intubating conditions, vocal cord position, cough severity, and degree of patient satisfaction were recorded. Student's t test was used to analyze parametric data, while the Mann-Whitney U test was applied to non-parametric data and Fisher's test to categorical data. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: The time taken for intubation was significantly shorter in Group B [115.2 (14.7) s compared with Group N [214.0 (22.2) s] (P = 0.029). The intubating conditions and degree of patient comfort were better in Group B compared with Group N. Although all patients were successfully intubated, patient satisfaction was higher in Group B.

Conclusions: Airway nerve blocks are preferable to lignocaine nebulization as they provide superior-quality airway anesthesia. However, nebulization may be a suitable alternative when a nerve block is not feasible.

Keywords: Airway management; Dexmedetomidine; Intubation; Lignocaine; Nebulizers; Nerve block.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
CONSORT flow chart.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Mean intubation time. Data are presented as mean (SD).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of intubating conditions between two groups. Data are presented as the number of patients.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Comparison of hemodynamic parameters between nebulization and nerve block groups. HR: heart rate, MAP: mean arterial pressures, SpO2: oxygen saturation, ^ neb/n. block: nebulization/nerve blocks.

References

    1. Panchabhai TS, Mehta AC. Historical perspectives of bronchoscopy. Connecting the dots. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12:631–41.
    1. Yrigoyen E, Fujikawa YF. Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Anesthesia, technique and results. West J Med. 1975;122:117–22.
    1. Díaz-Jimenez JP, Rodriguez AN. Interventions in Pulmonary Medicine. Houston: Springer; 2013. pp. 13–31.
    1. Parkes SB, Butler CS, Muller R. Plasma lignocaine concentration following nebulization for awake intubation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1997;25:369–71.
    1. Dhasmana SC. Nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation: patient comfort, intubating conditions and hemodynamic stability during conscious sedation with different doses of dexmedetomidine. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014;13:53–8.
    1. Gupta B, Kohli S, Farooque K, Jalwal G, Gupta D, Sinha S, et al. Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014;8(Suppl 1):S15–9.
    1. Ikeda S, Yanai N, Ishikawa S. Flexible bronchofiberscope. Keio J Med. 1968;17:1–16.
    1. Murphy P. A fibre-optic endoscope used for nasal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1967;22:489–91.
    1. Webb AR, Fernando SS, Dalton HR, Arrowsmith JE, Woodhead MA, Cummin AR. Local anaesthesia for fibreoptic bronchoscopy: transcricoid injection or the “spray as you go” technique? Thorax. 1990;45:474–7.
    1. Graham DR, Hay JG, Clague J, Nisar M, Earis JE. Comparison of three different methods used to achieve local anesthesia for fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest. 1992;102:704–7.
    1. Kundra P, Kutralam S, Ravishankar M. Local anaesthesia for awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:511–6.
    1. Sutherland AD, Santamaria JD, Nana A. Patient comfort and plasma lignocaine concentrations during fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1985;13:370–4.
    1. Gjonaj ST, Lowenthal DB, Dozor AJ. Nebulized lidocaine administered to infants and children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy. Chest. 1997;112:1665–9.
    1. Reasoner DK, Warner DS, Todd MM, Hunt SW, Kirchner J. A comparison of anesthetic techniques for awake intubation in neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1995;7:94–9.
    1. Sethi N, Tarneja VK, Madhusudanan TP, Shouche S. Local anaesthesia for fiberoptic intubation: a comparison of three techniques. Med J Armed Forces India. 2005;61:22–5.
    1. Mondal S, Ghosh S, Bhattacharya S, Choudhury B, Mallick S, Prasad A. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on intubation conditions during awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a randomized double-blind prospective study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31:212–6.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe