Surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistula-predictors of outcome and effects on quality of life

Erik V Söderqvist, Peter H Cashin, Wilhelm Graf, Erik V Söderqvist, Peter H Cashin, Wilhelm Graf

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the results after rectovaginal fistula (RVF) repair and find predictors of outcome. Primary objective was fistula healing. Secondary outcomes were morbidity and patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Method: An observational study of 55 women who underwent RVF repair including both local procedures and tissue transposition 2003-2018 was performed. Baseline patient and fistula characteristics were registered, combined with a prospective HRQoL follow-up and a general questionnaire describing fistula symptoms.

Results: Healing rate after index surgery was 25.5% (n = 14) but the final healing rate was 67.3% (n = 37). Comparing the etiologies, traumatic fistulas (iatrogenic and obstetric) had the highest healing rates after index surgery (n = 11, 45.9%) and after repeated operations at final follow-up (n = 22, 91.7%) compared with fistulas of inflammatory fistulas (Crohn's disease, cryptoglandular infection, and anastomotic leakage) that had inferior healing rates after both index surgery (n = 7, 7.1%) and at final follow-up (n = 13, 46.4%). Fistulas of the category others (radiation damage and unknown etiology) included a small amount of patients with intermediate results at both index surgery (n = 1, 33.3%) and healing rate at last follow-up (n = 2, 66.7%). The differences were statistically significant for both index surgery (p = 0.004) and at final follow-up (p = 0.001). Unhealed patients scored lower than both healed patients and the normal population in 6/8 Rand-36 domains, but the differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Most traumatic rectovaginal fistulas closed after repeated surgery whereas inflammatory fistulas had a poor prognosis. Low healing rates after local repairs suggest that tissue transfer might be indicated more early in the treatment process. Unhealed fistulas were associated with reduced quality of life. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov No. NCT05006586.

Keywords: Colorectal diseases; Colorectal surgery; Quality of life; Rectovaginal fistula; Vaginal diseases.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A flow chart illustrating our approach to RVF. In intermediate to high fistulation, an endorectal approach is usually preferred over a transperineal approach. Intermediate fistulation provides the option of several possible methods, the most common being ERAF. Gracilis transposition is most commonly reserved for patients with recurrent fistulation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The cumulative percentage (y axis) of healed fistulas correlated to the number of attempts at fistula closure (x axis). Figures within colored fields indicate the number of patients
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean RAND-36 domain scores (x-axis) for three categories of fistula patients (healed, unhealed, and uncertain healing, all matching the patient’s opinion) and the average score for the entire fistula population compared to the total Swedish population (Norm pop). PF = physical functioning; RP = role-physical; BP = bodily pain; GH = general health; VT = vitality; SF = social functioning; RE = role-emotional; MH = mental health

References

    1. El-Gazzaz G, Hull TL, Mignanelli E, Hammel J, Gurland B, Zutshi M. Obstetric and cryptoglandular rectovaginal fistulas: long-term surgical outcome; quality of life; and sexual function. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1758–1763. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1259-y.
    1. de Bernis L. Obstetric fistula: guiding principles for clinical management and programme development, a new WHO guideline. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;99:S117–S121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.06.032.
    1. Lowry AC, Thorson AG, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Repair of simple rectovaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:676–678. doi: 10.1007/BF02552581.
    1. Homsi R, Daikoku NH, Littlejohn J, Wheeless CR. Episiotomy: risks of dehiscence and rectovaginal fistula. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994;49:803–808. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199412000-00002.
    1. Pinto R, Peterson T, Shawki S, Davila G, Wexner S. Are there predictors of outcome following rectovaginal fistula repair? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1240–1247. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e536cb.
    1. Giordano P, Drew PJ, Taylor D, Duthie G, Lee PWR, Monson JRT. Vaginography—investigation of choice for clinically suspected vaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:568–572. doi: 10.1007/BF02058713.
    1. El-Gazzaz G, Hull T, Mignanelli E, Hammel J, Gurland B, Zutshi M. Analysis of function and predictors of failure in women undergoing repair of Crohn’s related rectovaginal fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:824–829. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1167-1.
    1. Heyen F, Winslet MC, Andrews H, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MRB. Vaginal fistulas in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32:379–383. doi: 10.1007/BF02563688.
    1. Göttgens KW, Smeets RR, Stassen LP, Beets G, Breukink SO. The disappointing quality of published studies on operative techniques for rectovaginal fistulas: a blueprint for a prospective multi-institutional study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:888–898. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000147.
    1. Fleshner PR, Schoetz DJ, Roberts PL, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Anastomotic-vaginal fistula after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:938–943. doi: 10.1007/BF02253495.
    1. Nowacki MP, Szawlowski AW, Borkowski A. Parks’ coloanal sleeve anastomosis for treatment of postirradiation rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;29:817–820. doi: 10.1007/BF02555353.
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Rothenberger DA, Christenson CE, Balcos EG, Schottler JL, Nemer FD, Nivatvongs S, Goldberg SM. Endorectal advancement flap for treatment of simple rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982;25:297–300. doi: 10.1007/BF02553599.
    1. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE. The Swedish SF-36 health survey—I. evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1349–1358. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-Q.
    1. Ozuner G, Hull TL, Cartmill J, Fazio VW. Long-term analysis of the use of transanal rectal advancement flaps for complicated anorectal/vaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:10–14. doi: 10.1007/BF02048261.
    1. Sonoda T, Tracy Hull MD, Piedmonte MR, MA, Victor W Fazio, MB, MS, Outcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1622–1628. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-7249-y.
    1. MacRae HM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z, Stern H, Reznick R. Treatment of rectovaginal fistulas that has failed previous repair attempts. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:921–925. doi: 10.1007/BF02049726.
    1. Ruiz D, Bashankaev B, Speranza J, Wexner SD, Rabau M. Graciloplasty for rectourethral, rectovaginal and rectovesical fistulas: technique overview, pitfalls and complications. Tech Coloproctol. 2008;12:277–282. doi: 10.1007/s10151-008-0433-7.
    1. Rottoli M, Vallicelli C, Boschi L, Cipriani R, Poggioli G. Gracilis muscle transposition for the treatment of recurrent rectovaginal and pouch-vaginal fistula: is Crohn’s disease a risk factor for failure? A prospective cohort study. Updates Surg. 2018;70:485–490. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0558-9.
    1. Fürst A, Schmidbauer C, Swol-Ben J, Iesalnieks I, Schwandner O, Agha A. Gracilis transposition for repair of recurrent anovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas in Crohn’s disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:349–353. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0413-9.
    1. Ryoo S-B, Oh H-K, Ha H-K, Han EC, Kwon Y-H, Song I, Moon SH, Choe EK, Park KJ. Outcomes of surgical treatments for rectovaginal fistula and prognostic factors for successful closure: a single-center tertiary hospital experiences. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019;97:149–156. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.3.149.
    1. Troja A, Käse P, El-Sourani N, Raab H-R, Antolovic D. Treatment of recurrent rectovaginal/pouch-vaginal fistulas by gracilis muscle transposition – a single center experience. J Visc Surg. 2013;150:379–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.08.002.
    1. Bhome R, Monga A, Nugent KP. A transvaginal approach to rectovaginal fistulae for the colorectal surgeon: technical notes and case series. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22:305–311. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1775-4.
    1. Ellis CN. Outcomes after repair of rectovaginal fistulas using bioprosthetics. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1084–1088. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9339-8.
    1. Schwandner O, Fuerst A, Kunstreich K, Scherer R. Innovative technique for the closure of rectovaginal fistula using Surgisis™ mesh. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13:135–140. doi: 10.1007/s10151-009-0470-x.
    1. Baig MK, Zhao RH, Yuen CH, Nogueras JJ, Singh JJ, Weiss EG, Wexner SD. Simple rectovaginal fistulas. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15:323–327. doi: 10.1007/s003840000253.
    1. Brown HW, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Lower reproductive tract fistula repairs in inpatient US women, 1979–2006. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:403–410. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1653-3.
    1. Fu J, Liang Z, Zhu Y, Cui L, Chen W. Surgical repair of rectovaginal fistulas: predictors of fistula closure. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1659–1665. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04082-w.
    1. Oakley SH, Brown HW, Yurteri-Kaplan L, Greer JA, Richardson ML, Adelowo A, Lindo FM, Greene KA, Fok CS, Book NM, Saiz CM, Plowright LN, Harvie HS, Pauls RN. Practice patterns regarding management of rectovaginal fistulae: a multicenter review from the fellows’ pelvic research network. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21:123–128. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000162.
    1. Soriano D, Lemoine A, Laplace C, Deval B, Dessolle L, Darai E, Poitout P. Results of recto-vaginal fistula repair: retrospective analysis of 48 cases. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2001;96:75–79. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00411-5.
    1. Andreani SM, Dang HH, Grondona P, Khan AZ, Edwards DP. Rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:2215–2222. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9057-7.
    1. Pitel S, Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Chafai N, Shields C, Tiret E. Martius advancement flap for low rectovaginal fistula: short- and long-term results. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:e112–e115. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02544.x.
    1. Picciariello A, Papagni V, De Fazio M, Martines G, Memeo R, Vitarelli A, Dibra R, Altomare DF. Functional outcome and quality of life evaluation of graciloplasty for the treatment of complex recto-vaginal and recto-urethral fistulas. Updates Surg. 2020;72:205–211. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00704-x.
    1. Lefèvre JH, Bretagnol F, Maggiori L, Alves A, Ferron M, Panis Y. Operative results and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition for recurrent rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1290–1295. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a74700.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe