Assessment of an Exhaled Breath Test Using High-Pressure Photon Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry to Detect Lung Cancer

Shushi Meng, Qingyun Li, Zuli Zhou, Hang Li, Xianping Liu, Shuli Pan, Mingru Li, Lei Wang, Yanqing Guo, Mantang Qiu, Jun Wang, Shushi Meng, Qingyun Li, Zuli Zhou, Hang Li, Xianping Liu, Shuli Pan, Mingru Li, Lei Wang, Yanqing Guo, Mantang Qiu, Jun Wang

Abstract

Importance: Exhaled breath is an attractive option for cancer detection. A sensitive and reliable breath test has the potential to greatly facilitate diagnoses and therapeutic monitoring of lung cancer.

Objective: To investigate whether the breath test is able to detect lung cancer using the highly sensitive high-pressure photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPPI-TOFMS).

Design, setting, and participants: This diagnostic study was conducted with a prospective-specimen collection, retrospective-blinded evaluation design. Exhaled breath samples were collected before surgery and detected by HPPI-TOFMS. The detection model was constructed by support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. Patients with pathologically confirmed lung cancer were recruited from Peking University People's Hospital, and healthy adults without pulmonary noncalcified nodules were recruited from Aerospace 731 Hospital. Data analysis was performed from August to October 2020.

Exposures: Breath testing and SVM algorithm.

Main outcomes and measures: The detection performance of the breath test was measured by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: Exhaled breath samples were from 139 patients with lung cancer and 289 healthy adults, and all breath samples were collected and tested. Of all participants, 228 (53.27%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 57.0 (11.4) years. After clinical outcomes were ascertained, all participants were randomly assigned into the discovery data set (381 participants) and the blinded validation data set (47 participants). The discovery data set was further broken into a training set (286 participants) and a test set (95 participants) to construct and test the detection model. The detection model reached a mean (SD) of 92.97% (4.64%) for sensitivity, 96.68% (2.21%) for specificity, and 95.51% (1.93%) for accuracy in the test set after 500 iterations. In the blinded validation data set (47 participants), the model revealed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 92.86%, an accuracy of 95.74%, and an AUC of 0.9586.

Conclusions and relevance: This diagnostic study's results suggest that a breath test with HPPI-TOFMS is feasible and accurate for lung cancer detection, which may be useful for future lung cancer screenings.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr H Li reported receiving a patent for a handheld exhaled gas collector issued by Shenzhen Breatha Biological Technology Company, Ltd (202010621223). No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Flow Diagrams of Study Design…
Figure 1.. Flow Diagrams of Study Design and the Process of Support Vector Machine (SVM) Model Construction
The flow diagrams of study design (A) and the process of SVM model construction (B). C indicates parameter C, an important parameter in the SVM algorithm; EBUS-TBNA, endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspirate; LDCT, low-dose computed tomography.
Figure 2.. Exhaled Breath Sampling Equipment
Figure 2.. Exhaled Breath Sampling Equipment
Images show the design diagram (A) and sectional view (B) of the exhaled breath sampling equipment. The actual breath sampling equipment is connected with an air bag (C).
Figure 3.. Model Scores of Each Participant…
Figure 3.. Model Scores of Each Participant in Validation Data Set
The validation data set included 47 participants, with 28 individuals in the healthy control (HC) group and 19 patients with lung cancer (LC). Numbers on x-axis refer to participant identification numbers. BreLC indicates Breath Detector of Lung Cancer.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492
    1. Shlomi D, Abud M, Liran O, et al. . Detection of lung cancer and EGFR mutation by electronic nose system. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(10):1544-1551. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2017.06.073
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7-30. doi:10.3322/caac.21590
    1. Osarogiagbon RU, Veronesi G, Fang W, et al. . Early-stage NSCLC: advances in thoracic oncology 2018. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14(6):968-978. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2019.02.029
    1. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM, Pasmantier MW, Smith JP, Miettinen OS; International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators . Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(17):1763-1771. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa060476
    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. ; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395-409. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1102873
    1. Bölükbas S, Eberlein M, Schirren J. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(8):757-758. doi:10.1056/NEJMc0912888
    1. Nair VS. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(8):757. doi:10.1056/NEJMc0912888
    1. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, et al. . Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2418-2429. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.5521
    1. Carozzi FM, Bisanzi S, Carrozzi L, et al. ; ITALUNG Working Group . Multimodal lung cancer screening using the ITALUNG biomarker panel and low dose computed tomography. results of the ITALUNG biomarker study. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(1):94-101. doi:10.1002/ijc.30727
    1. Horváth I, Lázár Z, Gyulai N, Kollai M, Losonczy G. Exhaled biomarkers in lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(1):261-275. doi:10.1183/09031936.00142508
    1. Nakhleh MK, Amal H, Jeries R, et al. . Diagnosis and classification of 17 diseases from 1404 subjects via pattern analysis of exhaled molecules. ACS Nano. 2017;11(1):112-125. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b04930
    1. Gordon SM, Szidon JP, Krotoszynski BK, Gibbons RD, O’Neill HJ. Volatile organic compounds in exhaled air from patients with lung cancer. Clin Chem. 1985;31(8):1278-1282. doi:10.1093/clinchem/31.8.1278
    1. Hanna GB, Boshier PR, Markar SR, Romano A. Accuracy and methodologic challenges of volatile organic compound-based exhaled breath tests for cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(1):e182815. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2815
    1. Das MK, Bishwal SC, Das A, et al. . Investigation of gender-specific exhaled breath volatome in humans by GCxGC-TOF-MS. Anal Chem. 2014;86(2):1229-1237. doi:10.1021/ac403541a
    1. Marzorati D, Mainardi L, Sedda G, Gasparri R, Spaggiari L, Cerveri P. A review of exhaled breath: a key role in lung cancer diagnosis. J Breath Res. 2019;13(3):034001. doi:10.1088/1752-7163/ab0684
    1. Gaugg MT, Gomez DG, Barrios-Collado C, et al. . Expanding metabolite coverage of real-time breath analysis by coupling a universal secondary electrospray ionization source and high resolution mass spectrometry—a pilot study on tobacco smokers. J Breath Res. 2016;10(1):016010. doi:10.1088/1752-7155/10/1/016010
    1. Markar SR, Chin ST, Romano A, et al. . Breath volatile organic compound profiling of colorectal cancer using selected ion flow-tube mass spectrometry. Ann Surg. 2019.269(5):903-910. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002539
    1. Trefz P, Schmidt M, Oertel P, et al. . Continuous real time breath gas monitoring in the clinical environment by proton-transfer-reaction-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2013;85(21):10321-10329. doi:10.1021/ac402298v
    1. Chen H, Wortmann A, Zhang W, Zenobi R. Rapid in vivo fingerprinting of nonvolatile compounds in breath by extractive electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46(4):580-583. doi:10.1002/anie.200602942
    1. Jiang D, Li E, Zhou Q, et al. . Online monitoring of intraoperative exhaled propofol by acetone-assisted negative photoionization ion mobility spectrometry coupled with time-resolved purge introduction. Anal Chem. 2018;90(8):5280-5289. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00171
    1. Jiang D, Wang X, Chen C, et al. . Dopant-assisted photoionization positive ion mobility spectrometry coupled with time-resolved purge introduction for online quantitative monitoring of intraoperative end-tidal propofol. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1032:83-90. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2018.06.047
    1. Xiao Y, Wang X, Li E, et al. . Rapid determination of intraoperative blood propofol concentration in operating theatre by dopant-enhanced neutral release and negative photoionization ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2020;1098:47-55. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2019.11.011
    1. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. ; STARD Group . STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015;351:h5527. doi:10.1136/bmj.h5527
    1. Ransohoff DF. The process to discover and develop biomarkers for cancer: a work in progress. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(20):1419-1420. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn339
    1. Wang Y, Jiang J, Hua L, et al. . High-pressure photon ionization source for TOFMS and its application for online breath analysis. Anal Chem. 2016;88(18):9047-9055. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01707
    1. Bousamra M II, Schumer E, Li M, et al. . Quantitative analysis of exhaled carbonyl compounds distinguishes benign from malignant pulmonary disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(3):1074-1080. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.006
    1. van de Goor R, van Hooren M, Dingemans AM, Kremer B, Kross K. Training and validating a portable electronic nose for lung cancer screening. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(5):676-681. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2018.01.024
    1. Pepe MS, Etzioni R, Feng Z, et al. . Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(14):1054-1061. doi:10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054
    1. Baker SG, Kramer BS, McIntosh M, Patterson BH, Shyr Y, Skates S. Evaluating markers for the early detection of cancer: overview of study designs and methods. Clin Trials. 2006;3(1):43-56. doi:10.1191/1740774506cn130oa
    1. Li Q, Hua L, Xie Y, et al. . Single photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry with a windowless RF-discharge lamp for high temporal resolution monitoring of the initial stage of methanol-to-olefins reaction. Analyst. 2019;144(4):1104-1109. doi:10.1039/C8AN01840E
    1. Yang W, Qian F, Teng J, et al. ; Written on behalf of the AME Thoracic Surgery Collaborative Group . Community-based lung cancer screening with low-dose CT in China: results of the baseline screening. Lung Cancer. 2018;117:20-26. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.01.003
    1. Yau G, Lock M, Rodrigues G. Systematic review of baseline low-dose CT lung cancer screening. Lung Cancer. 2007;58(2):161-170. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.07.006
    1. Wang Y, Hua L, Jiang J, et al. . High-pressure photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry combined with dynamic purge-injection for rapid analysis of volatile metabolites in urine. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1008:74-81. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2018.01.006

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe