A prospective randomised control trial comparing functional with mechanical axis alignment in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for an investigator initiated trial

Richard Steer, Beth Tippett, R Nazim Khan, Dermot Collopy, Gavin Clark, Richard Steer, Beth Tippett, R Nazim Khan, Dermot Collopy, Gavin Clark

Abstract

Background: A drive to improve functional outcomes for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to alternative alignment being used. Functional alignment (FA) uses intraoperative soft tissue tension to determine the optimal position of the prosthesis within the patient's soft tissue envelope. Angular limits for bone resections are followed to prevent long-term prosthesis failure. This study will use the aid of robotic assistance to plan and implement the final prosthesis position. This method has yet to be compared to the traditional mechanically aligned (MA) knee in a randomised trial.

Methods: A blinded randomised control trial with 100 patients will be undertaken via Perth Hip and Knee Clinic. Fifty patients will undergo a MA TKA and fifty will undergo a FA TKA. Both alignment techniques will be balanced via computer-assisted navigation to assess prosthetic gaps, being achieved via the initial bony resection and further soft tissue releases as required to achieve satisfactory balance. The primary outcome will be the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) 2 years after surgery, with secondary outcomes being other patient-reported outcome measures, clinical functional assessment, radiographic position and complications. Other data that will be collected will be patient demography (sex, age, level of activity) and medical information (grade of knee injury, any other relevant medical information). The linear statistical model will be fitted to the response (FJS), including all the other variables as covariates.

Discussion: Many surgeons are utilising alternative alignment techniques with a goal of achieving better functional outcomes for their patients. Currently, MA TKA remains the gold standard with good outcomes and excellent longevity. There is no published RCTs comparing FA to MA yet and only two registered studies are planned or currently in progress. This study utilises a FA technique which differs from the two studies. This study will help determine if FA TKA has superior functional results for patients.

Trial registration: This trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) http://www.anzctr.org.au : U1111-1257-2291, registered 25th Jan 2021. It is also listed on www.clinicaltrials.gov : NCT04748510.

Keywords: Clinical outcomes; Functional alignment; Kinematic alignment; Mechanical alignment; Total knee arthroplasty.

Conflict of interest statement

GC and DC have given paid lectures for Stryker and receive consultancy fees from Stryker Inc. None of the investigators has any financial or other conflicts of interest in the process of outcomes of this trial.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for reporting serious adverse events

References

    1. de Steiger RN, Liu Y-L, Graves SE. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(8):635–642. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01496.
    1. Jorgensen NB, McAuliffe M, Orschulok T, Lorimer MF, de Steiger R. Major aseptic revision following total knee replacement: a study of 478,081 total knee replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(4):302–310. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01528.
    1. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?, Clinical Orthopaedics and related research®. 2010;468(1):57–63.
    1. Dunbar MJ, Richardson G, Robertsson O. I can’t get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: rhymes and reasons. Bone Joint Journal. 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):148–52.
    1. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright EA, Sledge CB. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(10):2179. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00008.
    1. Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3854–3860. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021.
    1. Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):45–53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5.
    1. Patil S, McCauley JC, Pulido P, Colwell CW. How do knee implants perform past the second decade? Nineteen- to 25-year followup of the press-fit condylar design TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):135–140. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3792-6.
    1. MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Harris IA, Bellemans J, Chen DB. Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(2):329–337. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-1050.R1.
    1. Rivière C, Iranpour F, Auvinet E, Howell S, Vendittoli PA, Cobb J, et al. Alignment options for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(7):1047–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.010.
    1. Vanlommel L, Vanlommel J, Claes S, Bellemans J. Slight undercorrection following total knee arthroplasty results in superior clinical outcomes in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2325–2330. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2481-4.
    1. Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):1000–1007. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2613-z.
    1. Almaawi AM, Hutt JRB, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli P-A. The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(7):2133–2140. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.028.
    1. Hutt JRB, LeBlanc MA, Massé V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA. Kinematic TKA using navigation: surgical technique and initial results. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(1):99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.11.010.
    1. Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Ishida K, Hayashi S, Hashimoto S, Kuroda R. Radiological and clinical comparison of kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(5):640–646. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0688.R2.
    1. Waterson HB, Clement ND, Eyres KS, Mandalia VI, Toms AD. The early outcome of kinematic versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised control trial. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(10):1360–1368. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.36862.
    1. Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(7):907–913. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32812.
    1. Young SW, Walker ML, Bayan A, Briant-Evans T, Pavlou P, Farrington B. The Chitranjan S. Ranawat award: no difference in 2-year functional outcomes using kinematic versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(1):9–20.
    1. Laende EK, Richardson CG, Dunbar MJ. A randomized controlled trial of tibial component migration with kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment using computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(8):929–940. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2018-0755.R3.
    1. MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Chen DB, Griffiths-Jones S, Wood JA, Diwan AD, et al. Restoring the constitutional alignment with a restrictive kinematic protocol improves quantitative soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(1):117–124. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B1.BJJ-2019-0674.R2.
    1. McEwen PJ, Dlaska CE, Jovanovic IA, Doma K, Brandon BJ. Computer-assisted kinematic and mechanical axis total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial of bilateral simultaneous surgery. J Arthroplast. 2020;35(2):443–450. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.064.
    1. MacDessi SJ, Gharaibeh MA, Harris IA. How accurately can soft tissue balance be determined in total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplast. 2019;34(2):290–294.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.003.
    1. Levine BR, Springer BD, Golladay GJ. Highlights of the 2019 American joint replacement registry annual report. Arthroplasty today. 2020;6(4):998–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.09.010.
    1. Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A, Onochie E, Al-Jabri T, Haddad FS. Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(10):611–617. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190022.
    1. Chang JS, Kayani B, Wallace C, Haddad FS. Functional alignment achieves soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty as measured with quantitative sensor-guided technology. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(3):1–8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-0940.R1.
    1. Oussedik S, Abdel MP, Victor J, Pagnano MW, Haddad FS. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(3):276–279. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1729.
    1. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Oussedik S, Moriarty PD, Haddad FS. A prospective double-blinded randomised control trial comparing robotic arm-assisted functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Trials. 2020;21(1):194–110. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4123-8.
    1. Young SW. ANZCTR - CAMELOT Study. Accessed 26th February 2021. Available from: .
    1. MacDessi SJ. ANZCTR - RASKAL Study. Accessed 26th February 2021. Available from: .
    1. Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420(420):213–219. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200403000-00030.
    1. Garratt AM, Brealey S, Gillespie WJ, Team DT. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2004;43(11):1414–1423. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh362.
    1. Kreibich DN, Vaz M, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Kim P, Hardie R, et al. What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:221. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199610000-00031.
    1. Ganko A, Engebretsen L, Ozer H. The Rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy. 2000;8(1):36–39. doi: 10.1007/s001670050008.
    1. Burns SP, Spanier DE. Break-technique handheld dynamometry: relation between angular velocity and strength measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(7):1420–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.041.
    1. Lu TW, Hsu HC, Chang LY, Chen HL. Enhancing the examiner's resisting force improves the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements: comparison of a new device with hand-held dynamometry. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(9):679–84. 10.2340/16501977-0107.
    1. O’Shea SD, Taylor NF, Paratz JD. Measuring muscle strength for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(1):32–36. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.002.
    1. Holtz N, Hamilton DF, Giesinger JM, Jost B, Giesinger K. Minimal important differences for the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and the forgotten joint Score-12 in total knee arthroplasty patients. Bmc Musculoskelet Di. 2020;21(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03415-x.
    1. Clement ND, Scott CEH, Hamilton DF, MacDonald D, Howie CR. Meaningful values in the forgotten joint score after total knee arthroplasty: minimal clinical important difference, minimal important and detectable changes, and patient-acceptable symptom state. Bone Jt J. 2021;103-B(5):846–854. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2020-0396.R1.
    1. Fox J. Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related methods. Third Edition. Sage; 2016. Los Angeles.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe