Mobile Geriatric Teams - A Cost-Effective Way Of Improving Patient Safety And Reducing Traditional Healthcare Utilization Among The Frail Elderly? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sofi Fristedt, Paul Nystedt, Örjan Skogar, Sofi Fristedt, Paul Nystedt, Örjan Skogar

Abstract

Background: Demographic changes combined with costly technological progress put a financial strain on the healthcare sector in the industrialized world. Hence, there is a constant need to develop new cost-effective treatment procedures in order to optimize the use of available resources. As a response, the concept of a Mobile Geriatric Team (MGT) has emerged not only nationally but also internationally during the last decade; however, scientific evaluation of this initiative has been very scarce. Thus, the objective of this study was to perform a mixed methods analysis, including a prospective, controlled and randomized quantitative evaluation, in combination with an interview-based qualitative assessment, to measure the effectiveness and user satisfaction of MGT.

Materials and methods: Community-dwelling, frail elderly people were randomized to an intervention group (n=31, mean age 84) and a control group (n=31, mean age 86). A two-year retrospective quantitative data collection and a prospective one-year follow-up on healthcare utilization were combined with qualitative interviews. Non-parametric statistics and difference-in-difference (DiD) analyses were applied to the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.

Results: No significant group differences in healthcare utilization were found before inclusion. Post intervention, primary care contact (including MGTs) increased for the MGT group. Inpatient care decreased dramatically for both groups. Hence, the increase in primary care contact for MGT patients was not accompanied by a reduction in inpatient care compared to the control group. Utilization of non-primary care was lower (p< 0.01) post-intervention in both groups.

Conclusion: There appears to be a "natural" variation in healthcare needs over time among frail elderly people. Hence, it is vital to perform open, controlled clinical studies in tandem with the implementation of new caregiving strategies. The MGT initiative was clearly appreciated but did not fully achieve the desired reduction in healthcare utilization in this study.

Trial registration: Retrospectively registered 09/10/2018, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03662945.

Keywords: frail elderly; healthcare utilization; mobile geriatric team; patient safety; quality of life.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

© 2019 Fristedt et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative proportions of degrees of chronic illnesses in an elderly population. Reproduced with permission from Lifvergren S. Quality Improvement in Healthcare. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology; 2013.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart on the sampling process.

References

    1. Bloom DE, Chatterji S, Kowal P, et al. Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):649–657. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61464-1
    1. Folkhälsomyndigheten. Folkhälsan I Sverige 2016. Årlig Rapportering [Public Health in Sweden 2016. Yearly Report]. Stockholm: Public Health Agency of Sweden; 2016.
    1. Persson G, Boström G, Allebeck P, et al. Chapter 5. Elderly people’s health–65 and after. Health in Sweden: the National Public Health Report 2001. Scand J Public Health. 2001;58:117–131.
    1. Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;31(SupplementC):3–10. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007
    1. Yazdanyar A, Newman AB. The burden of cardiovascular disease in the elderly: morbidity, mortality, and costs. Clin Geriatr Med. 2009;25(4):563–vii. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2009.07.007
    1. Gobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. Toward a conceptual definition of frail community dwelling older people. Nurs Outlook. 2010;58(2):76–86. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2009.09.005
    1. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Slutrapport 2015 Sammanhållen Vård Och Omsorg Om De Mest Sjuka Äldre [Final Report 2015. Coordinated Health and Social Care for the Most Frail Older Persons.]. Stockholm: Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions; 2015.
    1. Mazya AL, Garvin P, Ekdahl AW. Outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment: effects on frailty and mortality in old people with multimorbidity and high health care utilization. Aging Clin Exp Res 2019;31:519. doi:10.1007/s40520-018-1004-z
    1. Pereira AA, Borim FSA, Neri AL. Risk of death in elderly persons based on the frailty phenotype and the frailty index: a review study. Revista Brasileira De Geriatria E Gerontologia. 2017;20:273–285. doi:10.1590/1981-22562017020.160102
    1. Buckinx F, Rolland Y, Reginster J-Y, Ricour C, Petermans J, Bruyère O. Burden of frailty in the elderly population: perspectives for a public health challenge. Archiv Public Health. 2015;73(1):19. doi:10.1186/s13690-015-0068-x
    1. Johansson L, Long H, Parker MG. Informal caregiving for elders in Sweden: an analysis of current policy developments. J Aging Soc Policy. 2011;23(4):335–353. doi:10.1080/08959420.2011.605630
    1. Cardona-Morrell M, Kim JCH, Brabrand M, Gallego-Luxan B, Hillman K. What is inappropriate hospital use for elderly people near the end of life? A systematic review. Eur J Intern Med. 2017;42(SupplementC):39–50. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2017.04.014
    1. Tistad M, Ytterberg C, Sjöstrand C, Widén Holmqvist L, von Koch L. Shorter length of stay in the stroke unit: comparison between the 1990s and 2000s. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(2):172–181. doi:10.1310/tsr1902-172
    1. Ellis G, Whitehead MA, Robinson D, Neill D, Langhorne P. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d6553–d6553. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6553
    1. Hayward KS. Facilitating interdisciplinary practice through mobile service provision to the rural older adult. Geriatr Nurs (Minneap). 2005;26(1):29–33. doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2004.11.011
    1. Lifvergren S. Quality Improvement in Healthcare. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology; 2013.
    1. Sahlen KG, Boman K, Brannstrom M. A cost-effectiveness study of person-centered integrated heart failure and palliative home care: based on a randomized controlled trial. Palliat Med. 2015;30:296–302.
    1. Hasselaar J, Payne S, Sahlen K-G, Boman K, Brännström M. A cost-effectiveness study of person-centered integrated heart failure and palliative home care: based on a randomized controlled trial. Palliat Med. 2016;30(3):296–302. doi:10.1177/0269216315618544
    1. Launay CP, Annweiler C, Delanoe-Telfour L, de Decker L, Kabeshova A, Beauchet O. Mobile geriatric team advice: effect on length of hospital stay in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(2):390–391. doi:10.1111/jgs.12677
    1. Brorsson B, Hulter Åsberg K. Katz index of independence in ADL. Reliability and validity in short-term care. Scand J Rehab Med. 1984;16:125–132.
    1. Folstein MF, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The mini-mental state examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(7):812. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790060110016
    1. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
    1. Creswell JW. A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2014.
    1. Toofany S. Empowering older people. Nurs Older People. 2007;19(2):12–14.
    1. Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Studenski S, et al. Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons: a consensus report. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(4):625–634. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52174.x
    1. Ekdahl AW, Wirehn A-B, Alwin J, et al. Costs and effects of an ambulatory geriatric unit (the AGe-FIT Study): a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(6):497–503. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.074
    1. Farquhar MC, Ewing G, Booth S. Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate complex interventions in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2011;25(8):748–757. doi:10.1177/0269216311417919

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe