Implementation and evaluation of a large-scale postpartum family planning program in Rwanda: study protocol for a clinic-randomized controlled trial

Kristin M Wall, Rosine Ingabire, Amelia Mazzei, Claudine Umuhoza, Rachel Parker, Amanda Tichacek, Azhar Nizam, Jessica M Sales, Lisa B Haddad, Phaedra Corso, Susan Allen, Julien Nyombayire, Etienne Karita, Kristin M Wall, Rosine Ingabire, Amelia Mazzei, Claudine Umuhoza, Rachel Parker, Amanda Tichacek, Azhar Nizam, Jessica M Sales, Lisa B Haddad, Phaedra Corso, Susan Allen, Julien Nyombayire, Etienne Karita

Abstract

Background: Though the Rwandan Ministry of Health (MOH) prioritizes the scale-up of postpartum family planning (PPFP) programs, uptake and sustainability of PPFP services in Rwanda are low. Furthermore, highly effective long-acting reversible contraceptive method use (LARC), key in effective PPFP programs, is specifically low in Rwanda. We previously pilot tested a supply-demand intervention which significantly increased the use of postpartum LARC (PPLARC) in Rwandan government clinics. In this protocol, we use an implementation science framework to test whether our intervention is adaptable to large-scale implementation, cost-effective, and sustainable.

Methods: In a type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study, we will evaluate the impact of our PPFP intervention on postpartum LARC (PPLARC) uptake in a clinic-randomized trial in 12 high-volume health facilities in Kigali, Rwanda. We will evaluate this hybrid study using the RE-AIM framework. The independent effectiveness of each PPFP demand creation strategy on PPLARC uptake among antenatal clinic attendees who later deliver in a study facility will be estimated. To assess sustainability, we will assess the intervention adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Finally, we will evaluate intervention cost-effectiveness and develop a national costed implementation plan.

Discussion: Adaptability and sustainability within government facilities are critical aspects of our proposal, and the MOH and other local stakeholders will be engaged from the outset. We expect to deliver PPFP counseling to over 21,000 women/couples during the project period. We hypothesize that the intervention will significantly increase the number of stakeholders engaged, PPFP providers and promoters trained, couples/clients receiving information about PPFP, and PPLARC uptake comparing intervention versus standard of care. We expect PPFP client satisfaction will be high. Finally, we also hypothesize that the intervention will be cost-saving relative to the standard of care. This intervention could dramatically reduce unintended pregnancy and abortion, as well as improve maternal and newborn health. Our PPFP implementation model is designed to be replicable and expandable to other countries in the region which similarly have a high unmet need for PPFP.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05056545 . Registered on 31 March 2022.

Keywords: Birth spacing; Contraception; Family planning; Implementation; Postpartum; Rwanda; Stepped-wedge randomized trial.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

References

    1. USAID. DHS Statcompiler 2018. Available from: . Accessed 17 July 2018.
    1. USAID, MCHIP. Family planning needs during the first two years postpartum in Rwanda. 2010. Available from: . Accessed 17 July 2018.
    1. Cleland J, Shah IH, Benova L. A fresh look at the level of unmet need for family planning in the postpartum period, its causes and program implications. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015;41(3):155–162. doi: 10.1363/intsexrephea.41.3.155.
    1. Pfitzer A, Mackenzie D, Blanchard H, Hyjazi Y, Kumar S, Lisanework Kassa S, et al. A facility birth can be the time to start family planning: postpartum intrauterine device experiences from six countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(Suppl 2):S54–S61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.008.
    1. Ingabire R, Nyombayire J, Hoagland A, Da Costa V, Mazzei A, Haddad L, et al. Evaluation of a multi-level intervention to improve post-partum intrauterine device services in Rwanda. Gates Open Res. 2018;2(38).
    1. Espey J, Ingabire R, Nyombayire J, Hoagland A, Da Costa V, Mazzei A, et al. Postpartum long-acting contraception uptake and service delivery outcomes after a multilevel intervention in Kigali, Rwanda. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020.
    1. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–226. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
    1. Bernet AC, Willens DE, Bauer MS. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: implications for quality improvement science. Implement Sci. 2013;8(Suppl 1):S2-S. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-S1-S2.
    1. CFIR Research Team . Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. 2019.
    1. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–1327. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322.
    1. Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, Brock DW, Feeny D, Krahn M, et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Jama. 2016;316(10):1093–1103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12195.
    1. Neumann PJSG, Russell LB, Siegel SE, Ganiats TG, editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. 2. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.
    1. Da Costa V, Ingabire R, Sinabamenye R, Karita E, Umutoni V, Hoagland A, et al. An exploratory analysis of factors associated with interest in postpartum intrauterine device uptake among pregnant women and couples in Kigali, Rwanda. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2019;13:1179558119886843. doi: 10.1177/1179558119886843.
    1. Ingabire R, Mukamuyango J, Nyombayire J, Easter SR, Parker R, Mazzei A, et al. Development and uptake of long-acting reversible contraception services in Rwanda, 2009-2016. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019;28(12):1640–1649. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7423.
    1. Ingabire R, Nyombayire J, Hoagland A, Da Costa V, Mazzei A, Haddad L, et al. Evaluation of a multi-level intervention to improve postpartum intrauterine device services in Rwanda. Gates Open Res. 2018;2(38):38.
    1. Karita E, Nsanzimana S, Ndagije F, Wall KM, Mukamuyango J, Mugwaneza P, et al. Implementation and operational research: evolution of couples’ voluntary counseling and testing for HIV in Rwanda: from research to public health practice. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 2016;73(3):e51–ee8. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001138.
    1. Kelley AL, Hagaman AK, Wall KM, Karita E, Kilembe W, Bayingana R, et al. Promotion of couples’ voluntary HIV counseling and testing: a comparison of influence networks in Rwanda and Zambia. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:744. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3424-z.
    1. Kelley AL, Karita E, Sullivan PS, Katangulia F, Chomba E, Carael M, et al. Knowledge and perceptions of couples’ voluntary counseling and testing in urban Rwanda and Zambia: a cross-sectional household survey. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019573.
    1. Khu NH, Vwalika B, Karita E, Kilembe W, Bayingana RA, Sitrin D, et al. Fertility goal-based counseling increases contraceptive implant and IUD use in HIV-discordant couples in Rwanda and Zambia. Contraception. 2013;88(1):74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.004.
    1. Mazzei A, Ingabire R, Mukamuyango J, Nyombayire J, Sinabamenye R, Bayingana R, et al. Community health worker promotions increase uptake of long-acting reversible contraception in Rwanda. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0739-0.
    1. Rusa L, Ngirabega Jde D, Janssen W, Van Bastelaere S, Porignon D, Vandenbulcke W. Performance-based financing for better quality of services in Rwandan health centres: 3-year experience. Tropical Med Int Health. 2009;14(7):830–837. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02292.x.
    1. Hasson H. Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implement Sci. 2010;5:67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-67.
    1. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2:40. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-40.
    1. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 3. New York: The Free Press; 1962.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(9):1263–1278. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9.
    1. Creswell J. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe